A graft-to-recipient weight ratio of less than 0.7% under portal venous hemodynamics monitoring is a risk factor for early graft loss after living donor liver transplantation.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Niang-Cheng Lin, Cheng-Yen Chen, Hao-Jan Lei, Hsin-Lin Tsai, Yi-Fan Tsou, Fang-Cheng Kuo, Meng-Hsuan Chung, Cheng-Yuan Hsia, Che-Chuan Loong, Shu-Cheng Chou, Shen-Chih Wang, Chinsu Liu
{"title":"A graft-to-recipient weight ratio of less than 0.7% under portal venous hemodynamics monitoring is a risk factor for early graft loss after living donor liver transplantation.","authors":"Niang-Cheng Lin, Cheng-Yen Chen, Hao-Jan Lei, Hsin-Lin Tsai, Yi-Fan Tsou, Fang-Cheng Kuo, Meng-Hsuan Chung, Cheng-Yuan Hsia, Che-Chuan Loong, Shu-Cheng Chou, Shen-Chih Wang, Chinsu Liu","doi":"10.1007/s00595-025-03103-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the interaction between graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) and portal venous hemodynamics (PVH), with a net impact on the perioperative outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed, retrospectively, adult LDLT recipients divided into three groups according to their GRWR: Group 1, > 1.0% (n = 124); Group 2, 0.8 ~ 1.0% (n = 70); and Group 3, < 0.8% (n = 31).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intraoperative PVH parameters did not differ significantly among the groups, but Group 3 had the highest number of patients needing portal inflow modulation to achieve optimal final portal pressure. Group 3 was also more prone to delayed recovery of liver function, a higher incidence of posttransplant kidney injury necessitating dialysis (16.1% vs. 3.2% for Group 1 and 4.3% for Group 2, p = 0.015) and a higher incidence of liver graft loss within 3 months post-LDLT (22.6% vs. 7.3% for Group 1 and 4.3% for Group 2, p = 0.007). Logistic regression analysis revealed that extremely small liver grafts (GRWR < 0.7%) were the most significant risk factor for early graft loss (HR: 16.951, 95% CI: 3.961 ~ 72.535). Survival analysis revealed comparable outcomes between patients who received liver grafts with a GRWR of 0.7 ~ 0.8% and those who received liver grafts with a GRWR > 0.8%. Patients with extremely small liver grafts had significantly lower graft survival rates (1-month, 3-months, and 1-year post-LDLT, of 66.7%, 50.0%, and 50.0%, respectively (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Under intraoperative PVH monitoring, the accepted GRWR in LDLT could be extended to 0.7%, but a GRWR < 0.7% remains a risk factor for early graft loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-025-03103-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the interaction between graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) and portal venous hemodynamics (PVH), with a net impact on the perioperative outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

Methods: We analyzed, retrospectively, adult LDLT recipients divided into three groups according to their GRWR: Group 1, > 1.0% (n = 124); Group 2, 0.8 ~ 1.0% (n = 70); and Group 3, < 0.8% (n = 31).

Results: The intraoperative PVH parameters did not differ significantly among the groups, but Group 3 had the highest number of patients needing portal inflow modulation to achieve optimal final portal pressure. Group 3 was also more prone to delayed recovery of liver function, a higher incidence of posttransplant kidney injury necessitating dialysis (16.1% vs. 3.2% for Group 1 and 4.3% for Group 2, p = 0.015) and a higher incidence of liver graft loss within 3 months post-LDLT (22.6% vs. 7.3% for Group 1 and 4.3% for Group 2, p = 0.007). Logistic regression analysis revealed that extremely small liver grafts (GRWR < 0.7%) were the most significant risk factor for early graft loss (HR: 16.951, 95% CI: 3.961 ~ 72.535). Survival analysis revealed comparable outcomes between patients who received liver grafts with a GRWR of 0.7 ~ 0.8% and those who received liver grafts with a GRWR > 0.8%. Patients with extremely small liver grafts had significantly lower graft survival rates (1-month, 3-months, and 1-year post-LDLT, of 66.7%, 50.0%, and 50.0%, respectively (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Under intraoperative PVH monitoring, the accepted GRWR in LDLT could be extended to 0.7%, but a GRWR < 0.7% remains a risk factor for early graft loss.

门静脉血流动力学监测下移植物与受体重量比小于0.7%是活体肝移植术后早期移植物丢失的危险因素。
目的:探讨移植物与受体重量比(GRWR)与门静脉血流动力学(PVH)的相互作用对活体肝移植(LDLT)围手术期预后的净影响。方法:我们回顾性分析成人LDLT受体,根据其GRWR分为三组:1组,bb0 1.0% (n = 124);第二组,0.8 ~ 1.0% (n = 70);结果:术中PVH参数各组间无显著差异,但第3组需要门静脉流入调节以达到最佳最终门静脉压力的患者最多。3组也更容易出现肝功能恢复延迟,移植后肾损伤需要透析的发生率更高(16.1% vs. 1组为3.2%,2组为4.3%,p = 0.015), ldlt后3个月内肝移植丢失的发生率更高(22.6% vs. 1组为7.3%,2组为4.3%,p = 0.007)。Logistic回归分析显示极小肝移植(GRWR为0.8%)。极小肝移植患者的移植存活率(LDLT后1个月、3个月、1年)明显较低,分别为66.7%、50.0%、50.0%。(p结论:术中PVH监测下,LDLT患者可接受的GRWR可延长至0.7%,但GRWR不高
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgery Today
Surgery Today 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
208
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it"). The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信