Risk of gastrointestinal rebleeding in direct oral anticoagulant-treated population.

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Bianca Codrina Morarasu, Victorita Sorodoc, Constantin Simiras, Stefan Morarasu, Catalina Lionte, Raluca Ecaterina Haliga, Cristina Bologa, Mihai Constantin, Alexandr Ceasovschih, Alexandra-Diana Diaconu, Raluca Elena Alexa, Andreea Asaftei, Emilia Adriana Marciuc, Mohammed Elsiddig, Laurentiu Sorodoc
{"title":"Risk of gastrointestinal rebleeding in direct oral anticoagulant-treated population.","authors":"Bianca Codrina Morarasu, Victorita Sorodoc, Constantin Simiras, Stefan Morarasu, Catalina Lionte, Raluca Ecaterina Haliga, Cristina Bologa, Mihai Constantin, Alexandr Ceasovschih, Alexandra-Diana Diaconu, Raluca Elena Alexa, Andreea Asaftei, Emilia Adriana Marciuc, Mohammed Elsiddig, Laurentiu Sorodoc","doi":"10.1093/postmj/qgaf090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of rebleeding events and their association with direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) discontinuation versus resumption in patients admitted with an index episode of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) while on oral anticoagulants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We included patients ≥18 years between January 2018 and December 2022. The cohort was divided into two groups, initially based on anticoagulant management at discharge, subsequently, according to bleeding events during follow-up, which ended at the time of death, last clinical contact, time of the event, or within 6 months since last patient was included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 patients were included. Those with HAS-BLED score > 3 were more likely discontinue DOAC (P = 0.0009). Significantly more patients with previous GIB had a rebleeding episode (29.6% vs. 6.4%, P = 0.002) and a 4-fold higher risk of rebleeding in the first 15.2 months (HR 4.070, CI [1.771-9.354], P = 0.001). A history of diabetes mellitus, malignancy, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED score > 3 was associated with an increased rebleeding risk, but without statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Previous episode of GIB is the most significant risk factor for recurrent bleeding in DOAC-treated patients. It leads to a four times higher risk of bleeding, particularly in the first 15 months. Patients aged ≥75, with a history of diabetes mellitus, malignancy, and HAS-BLED score > 3 should be closely followed-up. Timing of anticoagulation resumption and specific DOAC agent did not influence the rate of rebleeding, supporting their proven benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":20374,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgaf090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We performed a retrospective analysis of rebleeding events and their association with direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) discontinuation versus resumption in patients admitted with an index episode of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) while on oral anticoagulants.

Materials and methods: We included patients ≥18 years between January 2018 and December 2022. The cohort was divided into two groups, initially based on anticoagulant management at discharge, subsequently, according to bleeding events during follow-up, which ended at the time of death, last clinical contact, time of the event, or within 6 months since last patient was included.

Results: A total of 120 patients were included. Those with HAS-BLED score > 3 were more likely discontinue DOAC (P = 0.0009). Significantly more patients with previous GIB had a rebleeding episode (29.6% vs. 6.4%, P = 0.002) and a 4-fold higher risk of rebleeding in the first 15.2 months (HR 4.070, CI [1.771-9.354], P = 0.001). A history of diabetes mellitus, malignancy, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED score > 3 was associated with an increased rebleeding risk, but without statistical significance.

Conclusion: Previous episode of GIB is the most significant risk factor for recurrent bleeding in DOAC-treated patients. It leads to a four times higher risk of bleeding, particularly in the first 15 months. Patients aged ≥75, with a history of diabetes mellitus, malignancy, and HAS-BLED score > 3 should be closely followed-up. Timing of anticoagulation resumption and specific DOAC agent did not influence the rate of rebleeding, supporting their proven benefit.

直接口服抗凝治疗人群胃肠道再出血的风险。
简介:我们对口服抗凝剂期间有胃肠道出血指数发作(GIB)的患者进行了再出血事件及其与直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)停药和恢复用药的关系的回顾性分析。材料和方法:我们纳入了2018年1月至2022年12月期间≥18岁的患者。该队列被分为两组,最初基于出院时的抗凝治疗,随后根据随访期间的出血事件,结束于死亡时、最后一次临床接触时、事件发生时间或自最后一位患者纳入后6个月内。结果:共纳入120例患者。ha - bled评分为bb0.3的患者更有可能停止DOAC (P = 0.0009)。既往GIB患者再出血发生率显著增加(29.6% vs. 6.4%, P = 0.002),前15.2个月再出血风险增加4倍(HR 4.070, CI [1.771-9.354], P = 0.001)。糖尿病史、恶性肿瘤、CHA2DS2-VASc和ha - bled评分bbbb3与再出血风险增加相关,但无统计学意义。结论:既往GIB发作是doac治疗患者复发性出血的最重要危险因素。它会导致出血的风险增加四倍,尤其是在头15个月。年龄≥75岁,既往有糖尿病、恶性肿瘤病史,且HAS-BLED评分为bbbb3的患者应密切随访。抗凝恢复时间和特定DOAC药物不影响再出血率,支持其已证实的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Postgraduate Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Postgraduate Medical Journal is a peer reviewed journal published on behalf of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. The journal aims to support junior doctors and their teachers and contribute to the continuing professional development of all doctors by publishing papers on a wide range of topics relevant to the practicing clinician and teacher. Papers published in PMJ include those that focus on core competencies; that describe current practice and new developments in all branches of medicine; that describe relevance and impact of translational research on clinical practice; that provide background relevant to examinations; and papers on medical education and medical education research. PMJ supports CPD by providing the opportunity for doctors to publish many types of articles including original clinical research; reviews; quality improvement reports; editorials, and correspondence on clinical matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信