A single-centre audit of early warning scores and medical emergency team activation in medical and surgical admissions at Wellington Regional Hospital.
Julie K Cook, Rowan Biggs, Allie Eathorne, Tanira Kingi, Nick Shortt, Neakiry Kivi, Christina Elder, Alex Psirides, Richard Beasley, Louis Kirton
{"title":"A single-centre audit of early warning scores and medical emergency team activation in medical and surgical admissions at Wellington Regional Hospital.","authors":"Julie K Cook, Rowan Biggs, Allie Eathorne, Tanira Kingi, Nick Shortt, Neakiry Kivi, Christina Elder, Alex Psirides, Richard Beasley, Louis Kirton","doi":"10.1093/postmj/qgaf106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This single-centre retrospective audit evaluates the accuracy of nurse-documented vital signs and aggregated New Zealand's early warning scores (NZEWS) in high-acuity inpatients, and the proportion who appropriately received medical emergency team (MET) callouts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible patients admitted to general medicine and surgery services in the first 2 days of each month starting January 2022 and ending August 2022 and February 2023, respectively, had every documented vital sign and NZEWS entered into a database until 100 patients with an NZEWS of 6 or greater in the first 24 hours of the admission, or 10 patients with MET callouts per service were identified. We examined NZEWS calculations and their association with MET callout activation. An agreement analysis examined discrepancies between nurse-calculated and audit-calculated NZEWS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 491 screened admissions, 63 (12.8%) fulfilled criteria for inclusion and a total of 20 (4.1%) patients had at least 1 MET callout, of 23 who fulfilled MET criteria. Correct calculation and documentation occurred in three quarters (75.8%) of all NZEWS audited. Approximately half (46.8%) of the 47 individual NZEWS instances mandating MET activation resulted in a MET callout and only one in eight (12.8%) had a documented and accurately calculated NZEWS. The mean difference between nurse and audit-calculated NZEWS was -0.19 (nurse minus audit-calculated, with 95% confidence intervals of -0.28 to -0.09) with limits of agreement -3.64 to 3.26.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When dependent on manual processes, NZEWS documentation, calculation, and MET activation is suboptimal. Automation of NZEWS and MET callouts requires prioritization.</p>","PeriodicalId":20374,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgaf106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This single-centre retrospective audit evaluates the accuracy of nurse-documented vital signs and aggregated New Zealand's early warning scores (NZEWS) in high-acuity inpatients, and the proportion who appropriately received medical emergency team (MET) callouts.
Methods: Eligible patients admitted to general medicine and surgery services in the first 2 days of each month starting January 2022 and ending August 2022 and February 2023, respectively, had every documented vital sign and NZEWS entered into a database until 100 patients with an NZEWS of 6 or greater in the first 24 hours of the admission, or 10 patients with MET callouts per service were identified. We examined NZEWS calculations and their association with MET callout activation. An agreement analysis examined discrepancies between nurse-calculated and audit-calculated NZEWS.
Results: Of 491 screened admissions, 63 (12.8%) fulfilled criteria for inclusion and a total of 20 (4.1%) patients had at least 1 MET callout, of 23 who fulfilled MET criteria. Correct calculation and documentation occurred in three quarters (75.8%) of all NZEWS audited. Approximately half (46.8%) of the 47 individual NZEWS instances mandating MET activation resulted in a MET callout and only one in eight (12.8%) had a documented and accurately calculated NZEWS. The mean difference between nurse and audit-calculated NZEWS was -0.19 (nurse minus audit-calculated, with 95% confidence intervals of -0.28 to -0.09) with limits of agreement -3.64 to 3.26.
Conclusions: When dependent on manual processes, NZEWS documentation, calculation, and MET activation is suboptimal. Automation of NZEWS and MET callouts requires prioritization.
期刊介绍：
Postgraduate Medical Journal is a peer reviewed journal published on behalf of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. The journal aims to support junior doctors and their teachers and contribute to the continuing professional development of all doctors by publishing papers on a wide range of topics relevant to the practicing clinician and teacher. Papers published in PMJ include those that focus on core competencies; that describe current practice and new developments in all branches of medicine; that describe relevance and impact of translational research on clinical practice; that provide background relevant to examinations; and papers on medical education and medical education research. PMJ supports CPD by providing the opportunity for doctors to publish many types of articles including original clinical research; reviews; quality improvement reports; editorials, and correspondence on clinical matters.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
