Rumination in response to repugnant obsessions: Catching the sneakiest of compulsions.

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2025-07-10 DOI:10.1037/pst0000585
Jean-Philippe Gagné, Shiu F Wong
{"title":"Rumination in response to repugnant obsessions: Catching the sneakiest of compulsions.","authors":"Jean-Philippe Gagné, Shiu F Wong","doi":"10.1037/pst0000585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rumination is a mental process characterized by the repetitive analysis of concerns without taking concrete or helpful action. It has been shown to be transdiagnostic, contributing to the maintenance and exacerbation of symptoms across various mental disorders, including obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Historically conceptualized as part of the obsessional domain due to its repetitive and intrusive qualities, rumination is now better understood as a covert compulsion-one that reinforces the overimportance of otherwise normal, unwanted intrusions, particularly in the case of repugnant obsessions. Consequently, it is crucial for clinicians to frame rumination as a mental habit or behavior in which individuals with OCD attempt to understand the causes, meaning, and consequences of their thoughts. This unproductive and time-consuming process not only amplifies intrusive doubts but also worsens mood, placing individuals at high risk for comorbid depression. This article outlines how rumination fits within the cognitive-behavioral model of OCD and, more importantly, offers practical refinements to standard cognitive-behavioral therapy interventions, drawing from evidence-based strategies for OCD and related disorders as well as from behavioral activation. The aim is to better equip clinicians with tools to effectively target rumination in OCD, particularly in presentations involving repugnant obsessions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000585","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rumination is a mental process characterized by the repetitive analysis of concerns without taking concrete or helpful action. It has been shown to be transdiagnostic, contributing to the maintenance and exacerbation of symptoms across various mental disorders, including obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Historically conceptualized as part of the obsessional domain due to its repetitive and intrusive qualities, rumination is now better understood as a covert compulsion-one that reinforces the overimportance of otherwise normal, unwanted intrusions, particularly in the case of repugnant obsessions. Consequently, it is crucial for clinicians to frame rumination as a mental habit or behavior in which individuals with OCD attempt to understand the causes, meaning, and consequences of their thoughts. This unproductive and time-consuming process not only amplifies intrusive doubts but also worsens mood, placing individuals at high risk for comorbid depression. This article outlines how rumination fits within the cognitive-behavioral model of OCD and, more importantly, offers practical refinements to standard cognitive-behavioral therapy interventions, drawing from evidence-based strategies for OCD and related disorders as well as from behavioral activation. The aim is to better equip clinicians with tools to effectively target rumination in OCD, particularly in presentations involving repugnant obsessions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

对令人反感的强迫反应的反刍:捕捉最隐秘的强迫。
反刍是一种心理过程,其特点是反复分析所关注的问题,而不采取具体或有益的行动。它已被证明是跨诊断的,有助于维持和加剧各种精神障碍的症状,包括强迫症(强迫症)。由于其重复性和侵入性,反刍在历史上被定义为强迫性领域的一部分,现在被更好地理解为一种隐蔽的强迫——它强化了正常的、不必要的侵入的过度重要性,特别是在令人反感的强迫性的情况下。因此,对于临床医生来说,将反刍作为一种心理习惯或行为是至关重要的,在这种习惯或行为中,强迫症患者试图理解他们思想的原因、意义和后果。这种低效且耗时的过程不仅放大了侵入性的疑虑,还恶化了情绪,使个人处于患共病抑郁症的高风险之中。这篇文章概述了反刍如何适应强迫症的认知行为模型,更重要的是,从强迫症和相关疾病的循证策略以及行为激活中,为标准的认知行为治疗干预提供了实用的改进。其目的是为临床医生提供更好的工具,以有效地针对强迫症中的反刍,特别是在涉及令人反感的强迫行为的演讲中。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training publishes a wide variety of articles relevant to the field of psychotherapy. The journal strives to foster interactions among individuals involved with training, practice theory, and research since all areas are essential to psychotherapy. This journal is an invaluable resource for practicing clinical and counseling psychologists, social workers, and mental health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信