Attitudes among therapists who do (or do not) implement feedback-informed treatment.

Abstract

Studies of psychotherapy efficacy have highlighted the importance of feedback-informed treatment (FIT), which involves the routine collection of client process and outcome data to inform intervention formulation and clinical decision making. Despite the relative ease with which FIT measures can be integrated into therapeutic practices, many providers do not use these information-gathering tools. The present study analyzed survey responses from therapists whose use of FIT was systemically incentivized and structurally supported. Within this sample, two groups of providers emerged: one (n = 30) that remained engaged in the use of FIT and another (n = 19) that discontinued its use despite its implementation being facilitated. There were some significant differences between the groups. Clinicians who persisted with FIT perceived it as more valid and reported more openness to information from an outside source, whereas clinicians who disengaged from FIT endorsed more antagonistic views about measurement. In addition, clinicians who discontinued FIT reported having a greater belief in the predictive validity of their own judgments without the use of FIT data than did current FIT users. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of their reliance on intuition, but not on their feedback propensities. These findings contribute to the growing literature regarding the effect of attitudes on the use of measurement in therapy when structural barriers to implementation are reduced. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).