Brazilian scale for evaluation of mental health care needs (CuidaSM): evidence of validity in primary health care.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-07-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0323833
Joana Moscoso Teixeira de Mendonça, Ana Alice Freire de Sousa, Ilana Eshriqui, Flávio Rebustini, Daiana Bonfim, Daniella Sampaio Zorzi, Camila Nascimento Monteiro, Talita Rewa, Leticia Yamawaka de Almeida
{"title":"Brazilian scale for evaluation of mental health care needs (CuidaSM): evidence of validity in primary health care.","authors":"Joana Moscoso Teixeira de Mendonça, Ana Alice Freire de Sousa, Ilana Eshriqui, Flávio Rebustini, Daiana Bonfim, Daniella Sampaio Zorzi, Camila Nascimento Monteiro, Talita Rewa, Leticia Yamawaka de Almeida","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0323833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In primary healthcare (PHC) settings, initiatives to identify mental health care needs (MHCN) are needed to ensure integral and quality care. However, there are few valid tools supporting health professionals in decision-making. This study aimed to obtain evidence of validity of the Brazilian Scale for Evaluation of Mental Health Care Needs (CuidaSM) in PHC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A group of health professional experts developed 130 dichotomous items, which were assessed by a heterogeneous group of panelists from different regions of Brazil (n = 73). Content validity ratio (CVR) was calculated, resulting in a second version of the scale with 43 items, which was administered to 879 healthcare users to provide evidence of internal-structure validity using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Dimensionality was assessed through robust parallel analysis and the model was then cross-validated to create the final CuidaSM version. The CuidaSM score was subjected to normalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final version of CuidaSM comprised 31 items, which were divided into two blocks: a \"self-referred\" block with 17 items distributed into five dimensions (Social Relationships, Functioning, Autonomy, Impulsiveness and Aggressiveness, and Spirituality) and a \"health professional evaluation\" block with 14 items and three dimensions (Violence, Self-aggression and Suicidal Behavior, and Caregiving Plan). The final model's explained variance was 62.7%. Dimensionality values pointed to a multidimensional model (UNICO = 0.79; ECV = 0.69; and MIREAL = 0.22). All indicators were within adequate and satisfactory limits. CuidaSM score normalization stratified MHCN into four strata.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CuidaSM scale is a concise instrument combining healthcare user self-assessment and health professional clinical assessment. CuidaSM show satisfactory evidence of validity and was found to be a consistent, reliable, and robust instrument capable of accurately measuring MHCN in the PHC setting in Brazil.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 7","pages":"e0323833"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12244584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In primary healthcare (PHC) settings, initiatives to identify mental health care needs (MHCN) are needed to ensure integral and quality care. However, there are few valid tools supporting health professionals in decision-making. This study aimed to obtain evidence of validity of the Brazilian Scale for Evaluation of Mental Health Care Needs (CuidaSM) in PHC.

Methods: A group of health professional experts developed 130 dichotomous items, which were assessed by a heterogeneous group of panelists from different regions of Brazil (n = 73). Content validity ratio (CVR) was calculated, resulting in a second version of the scale with 43 items, which was administered to 879 healthcare users to provide evidence of internal-structure validity using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Dimensionality was assessed through robust parallel analysis and the model was then cross-validated to create the final CuidaSM version. The CuidaSM score was subjected to normalization.

Results: The final version of CuidaSM comprised 31 items, which were divided into two blocks: a "self-referred" block with 17 items distributed into five dimensions (Social Relationships, Functioning, Autonomy, Impulsiveness and Aggressiveness, and Spirituality) and a "health professional evaluation" block with 14 items and three dimensions (Violence, Self-aggression and Suicidal Behavior, and Caregiving Plan). The final model's explained variance was 62.7%. Dimensionality values pointed to a multidimensional model (UNICO = 0.79; ECV = 0.69; and MIREAL = 0.22). All indicators were within adequate and satisfactory limits. CuidaSM score normalization stratified MHCN into four strata.

Conclusions: The CuidaSM scale is a concise instrument combining healthcare user self-assessment and health professional clinical assessment. CuidaSM show satisfactory evidence of validity and was found to be a consistent, reliable, and robust instrument capable of accurately measuring MHCN in the PHC setting in Brazil.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

巴西精神卫生保健需求评价量表(CuidaSM):初级卫生保健的有效性证据。
背景:在初级卫生保健(PHC)环境中,需要主动确定精神卫生保健需求(MHCN),以确保整体和高质量的护理。然而,支持卫生专业人员决策的有效工具很少。本研究旨在验证巴西精神卫生保健需求评估量表(CuidaSM)在初级卫生保健中的有效性。方法:一组卫生专业专家开发了130个二分法项目,由来自巴西不同地区的异质性小组成员(n = 73)进行评估。计算内容效度比(CVR),得到包含43个项目的第二版量表,并对879名医疗保健用户进行了探索性因子分析(EFA),以提供内部结构效度的证据。通过稳健的并行分析评估维度,然后交叉验证模型以创建最终的CuidaSM版本。CuidaSM评分归一化。结果:最终版本的CuidaSM包括31个项目,分为两个模块:自我参考模块包含17个项目,分为5个维度(社会关系、功能、自主性、冲动与攻击性和灵性);健康专业评估模块包含14个项目,分为3个维度(暴力、自我攻击与自杀行为和照顾计划)。最终模型的解释方差为62.7%。维度值指向一个多维模型(UNICO = 0.79;ecv = 0.69;MIREAL = 0.22)。所有指标都在适当和令人满意的范围内。CuidaSM评分归一化将MHCN分为四个层次。结论:CuidaSM量表是一种结合卫生保健使用者自我评估和卫生专业人员临床评估的简明工具。CuidaSM显示了令人满意的有效性证据,并被发现是一种一致、可靠和强大的仪器,能够准确测量巴西PHC环境中的MHCN。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信