{"title":"Management of analgesia in cardiac surgery.","authors":"Alessandro Strumia, Mario Lusini, Fabio Costa, Elisabetta Stefani, Elena Cipollone, Livio Cusimano, Francesca Libri, Massimiliano Ricci, Alessandro Ruggiero, Domenico Sarubbi, Alessia Mattei, Lorenzo Schiavoni, Raffaele Barbato, Ciro Mastroianni, Mohamad Jawabra, Felice Eugenio Agrò, Massimo Chello, Rita Cataldo, Massimiliano Carassiti, Giuseppe Pascarella","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2532359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain management in cardiac surgery remains a critical component of perioperative care, influencing recovery, patient satisfaction, and outcomes. Traditional opioid-based analgesia is associated with significant adverse effects, prompting the exploration of multimodal strategies, including regional anesthesia (RA), non-opioid analgesics, and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols.This review evaluates the evolution of cardiac surgery pain management, from conventional opioid-based regimens to multimodal approaches with regional anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive analysis of existing literature was conducted, assessing the efficacy, safety, and integration of different pain management strategies in cardiac surgery on PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, UpToDate, Embase and Web of Science until 1 November 2024. Studies on opioids, adjunct analgesics (e.g. NSAIDs, acetaminophen, ketamine, dexmedetomidine), RA techniques, and ERAS frameworks were reviewed to provide a comparative perspective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multimodal analgesia significantly reduces opioid consumption, enhances pain control, and minimizes complications such as respiratory depression and postoperative nausea. RA techniques, including fascial plane blocks, offer promising opioid-sparing benefits. ERAS protocols further optimize recovery, yet challenges remain in standardizing approaches across institutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The future of cardiac surgery pain management lies in individualized, multimodal strategies following ERAS principles. Standardized guidelines and further research are needed to refine these protocols for widespread adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2532359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Pain management in cardiac surgery remains a critical component of perioperative care, influencing recovery, patient satisfaction, and outcomes. Traditional opioid-based analgesia is associated with significant adverse effects, prompting the exploration of multimodal strategies, including regional anesthesia (RA), non-opioid analgesics, and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols.This review evaluates the evolution of cardiac surgery pain management, from conventional opioid-based regimens to multimodal approaches with regional anesthesia.
Methods: A comprehensive analysis of existing literature was conducted, assessing the efficacy, safety, and integration of different pain management strategies in cardiac surgery on PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, UpToDate, Embase and Web of Science until 1 November 2024. Studies on opioids, adjunct analgesics (e.g. NSAIDs, acetaminophen, ketamine, dexmedetomidine), RA techniques, and ERAS frameworks were reviewed to provide a comparative perspective.
Results: Multimodal analgesia significantly reduces opioid consumption, enhances pain control, and minimizes complications such as respiratory depression and postoperative nausea. RA techniques, including fascial plane blocks, offer promising opioid-sparing benefits. ERAS protocols further optimize recovery, yet challenges remain in standardizing approaches across institutions.
Conclusions: The future of cardiac surgery pain management lies in individualized, multimodal strategies following ERAS principles. Standardized guidelines and further research are needed to refine these protocols for widespread adoption.
背景:心脏手术中的疼痛管理仍然是围手术期护理的关键组成部分,影响康复、患者满意度和预后。传统的基于阿片类药物的镇痛具有显著的不良反应,这促使人们探索多模式策略,包括区域麻醉(RA)、非阿片类镇痛药和术后增强恢复(ERAS)方案。这篇综述评估了心脏手术疼痛管理的演变,从传统的基于阿片类药物的方案到区域麻醉的多模式方法。方法:综合分析现有文献,评估PubMed、谷歌Scholar、MEDLINE、UpToDate、Embase和Web of Science截至2024年11月1日的心脏手术中不同疼痛管理策略的有效性、安全性和整合性。综述了阿片类药物、辅助镇痛药(如非甾体抗炎药、对乙酰氨基酚、氯胺酮、右美托咪定)、RA技术和ERAS框架的研究,以提供比较视角。结果:多模式镇痛可显著减少阿片类药物的消耗,增强疼痛控制,并将呼吸抑制和术后恶心等并发症降至最低。类风湿性关节炎技术,包括筋膜平面阻滞,提供了有希望的阿片类药物节约的好处。ERAS协议进一步优化了采收率,但在各机构之间的标准化方法方面仍然存在挑战。结论:心脏手术疼痛管理的未来在于遵循ERAS原则的个性化、多模式策略。需要标准化的指导方针和进一步的研究来完善这些协议以供广泛采用。