Anna Kristina Stauffacher, Louise von Stockar, Hans-Friedrich Witschel, Stefanie Hayoz, Ulf Petrausch, Thomas Schmid, Andreas Jakob, Gerd A Kullak-Ublick, Andreas Trojan
{"title":"Unsupervised dynamic ePRO reporting of immunotherapy related symptoms in cancer patients.","authors":"Anna Kristina Stauffacher, Louise von Stockar, Hans-Friedrich Witschel, Stefanie Hayoz, Ulf Petrausch, Thomas Schmid, Andreas Jakob, Gerd A Kullak-Ublick, Andreas Trojan","doi":"10.1159/000546026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO) in patients has been demonstrated to improve patient care and symptom management in curative and palliative settings. We examined the electronic and dynamic reporting of wellbeing, symptoms, and cognition in unsupervised patients with solid cancers of bladder, breast and lung in neoadjuvant, adjuvant and metastatic therapy settings. Participants undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment were provided a mobile smartphone app for standardized and structured reporting on wellbeing and symptoms according to the CTCAE Criteria, as well as cognitive test and vital parameters.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>Data of 14 patients was available for descriptive analysis. Besides checkpoint inhibition, patients received concomitant chemotherapy with carboplatin and taxanes. Three patients were excluded for lack of app usage. The eleven patients presented here entered a total of 9624 symptom ratings and rated their wellbeing 2983 times. Patients recorded a median number of symptom entries of 453 (IQR 109-1401). 49 different symptoms were reported in total with a median of 8 per patient (IQR 4-15). Of the 24 symptoms that were frequently shared among multiple patients, all are considered clinically relevant and associated with immunotherapeutic interventions. The most commonly patient reported symptoms were fatigue (82%), diarrhea (45%), limb and muscle pain (45%), sleep problems (45%) and dyspnea (36%). Overall, symptoms severity was reported at grades between 0.1 (very mild) to 9.0 (very severe), at a mean grade of 2.6. The most severely rated unique entry was for limb and muscle pain, edema of limbs showed the highest mean rating (5.9). The median duration of app use was 195 days (IQR 108-472). The descriptive analysis showed a general trend of patients with higher grade symptoms reporting a lower grade of wellbeing but no clear association with cognitive performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unsupervised patients showed high app usage adherence and frequency of data entries, which was comparable to previous reports on supervised patients undergoing immunotherapeutic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The use of electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO) in patients has been demonstrated to improve patient care and symptom management in curative and palliative settings. We examined the electronic and dynamic reporting of wellbeing, symptoms, and cognition in unsupervised patients with solid cancers of bladder, breast and lung in neoadjuvant, adjuvant and metastatic therapy settings. Participants undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment were provided a mobile smartphone app for standardized and structured reporting on wellbeing and symptoms according to the CTCAE Criteria, as well as cognitive test and vital parameters.
Case presentation: Data of 14 patients was available for descriptive analysis. Besides checkpoint inhibition, patients received concomitant chemotherapy with carboplatin and taxanes. Three patients were excluded for lack of app usage. The eleven patients presented here entered a total of 9624 symptom ratings and rated their wellbeing 2983 times. Patients recorded a median number of symptom entries of 453 (IQR 109-1401). 49 different symptoms were reported in total with a median of 8 per patient (IQR 4-15). Of the 24 symptoms that were frequently shared among multiple patients, all are considered clinically relevant and associated with immunotherapeutic interventions. The most commonly patient reported symptoms were fatigue (82%), diarrhea (45%), limb and muscle pain (45%), sleep problems (45%) and dyspnea (36%). Overall, symptoms severity was reported at grades between 0.1 (very mild) to 9.0 (very severe), at a mean grade of 2.6. The most severely rated unique entry was for limb and muscle pain, edema of limbs showed the highest mean rating (5.9). The median duration of app use was 195 days (IQR 108-472). The descriptive analysis showed a general trend of patients with higher grade symptoms reporting a lower grade of wellbeing but no clear association with cognitive performance.
Conclusion: Unsupervised patients showed high app usage adherence and frequency of data entries, which was comparable to previous reports on supervised patients undergoing immunotherapeutic interventions.
期刊介绍:
Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.