T Mongini, G Gadaleta, P Alonge, L Vercelli, I Stura, O Musumeci, S Ravaglia, L Ruggiero, A Fiumara, R Barone, S Servidei, C Sancricca, G Siciliano, G Ricci, A Sechi, P Tonin, E Pegoraro, M Filosto, G D'Angelo, G Comi, L Maggi, A Barp, G Crescimanno, A Toscano
{"title":"Analysis of the Italian cohort of late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) patients after 10 and 15 years of therapy with alglucosidase alfa.","authors":"T Mongini, G Gadaleta, P Alonge, L Vercelli, I Stura, O Musumeci, S Ravaglia, L Ruggiero, A Fiumara, R Barone, S Servidei, C Sancricca, G Siciliano, G Ricci, A Sechi, P Tonin, E Pegoraro, M Filosto, G D'Angelo, G Comi, L Maggi, A Barp, G Crescimanno, A Toscano","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13206-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) is the first genetic neuromuscular disease treated with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in 2006, with variable results over time. This study aimed to assess therapeutic efficacy and safety in a large national cohort of patients after 10 and 15 years of treatment with alglucosidase alfa, all of them regularly evaluated in expert Centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed data from 15 Italian Centers, examining clinical-genetic features and motor and respiratory outcomes at baseline, 10 years (T10, n = 85), and 15 years (T15, n = 42) after ERT initiation. Patients were categorized by baseline 6-min walk test (6MWT: 1: < 150 m, 2: 150-299 m, 3: 300-449 m, 4: ≥ 450 m) or forced vital capacity (FVC: 0: < 80%, 1: ≥ 80%) to assess outcome differences based on initial functional status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients were ambulant at baseline. Motor performance, assessed by 6MWT, declined across all functional groups, but even the lowest-performing patients at baseline (Groups 1-2) were mostly ambulant by T15 (50% and 71% respectively). In the best performing patients at baseline (Group 4), subjects maintained quite high performance values also at T15, with a statistically significant decrement observed at T10, and a stabilization at T15; none of them lost ambulation at T15. Despite an overall FVC% reduction, 21/42 patients (50%) remained ventilator-free at T15. No ERT discontinuations or significant adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Alglucosidase alfa therapy showed variable results in a long-term perspective, confirming a reduction in mortality in all functional groups, and stabilization in several patients, without relevant safety concerns. Motor and respiratory function responses varied by functional groups and in single patients, underscoring the need for additional outcome measures. These long-term results will be useful for comparing the possible prolonged efficacy of the new therapies for Pompe disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 8","pages":"503"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13206-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) is the first genetic neuromuscular disease treated with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in 2006, with variable results over time. This study aimed to assess therapeutic efficacy and safety in a large national cohort of patients after 10 and 15 years of treatment with alglucosidase alfa, all of them regularly evaluated in expert Centers.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from 15 Italian Centers, examining clinical-genetic features and motor and respiratory outcomes at baseline, 10 years (T10, n = 85), and 15 years (T15, n = 42) after ERT initiation. Patients were categorized by baseline 6-min walk test (6MWT: 1: < 150 m, 2: 150-299 m, 3: 300-449 m, 4: ≥ 450 m) or forced vital capacity (FVC: 0: < 80%, 1: ≥ 80%) to assess outcome differences based on initial functional status.
Results: All patients were ambulant at baseline. Motor performance, assessed by 6MWT, declined across all functional groups, but even the lowest-performing patients at baseline (Groups 1-2) were mostly ambulant by T15 (50% and 71% respectively). In the best performing patients at baseline (Group 4), subjects maintained quite high performance values also at T15, with a statistically significant decrement observed at T10, and a stabilization at T15; none of them lost ambulation at T15. Despite an overall FVC% reduction, 21/42 patients (50%) remained ventilator-free at T15. No ERT discontinuations or significant adverse events were reported.
Conclusion: Alglucosidase alfa therapy showed variable results in a long-term perspective, confirming a reduction in mortality in all functional groups, and stabilization in several patients, without relevant safety concerns. Motor and respiratory function responses varied by functional groups and in single patients, underscoring the need for additional outcome measures. These long-term results will be useful for comparing the possible prolonged efficacy of the new therapies for Pompe disease.
背景和目的:迟发性庞贝病(LOPD)是2006年第一个用酶替代疗法(ERT)治疗的遗传性神经肌肉疾病,随着时间的推移,结果不同。本研究旨在评估一个大型的国家队列患者在接受alfa糖苷酶治疗10年和15年后的疗效和安全性,所有这些患者都在专家中心定期评估。方法:这项回顾性研究分析了来自15个意大利中心的数据,检查了ERT开始后基线、10年(T10, n = 85)和15年(T15, n = 42)的临床遗传特征和运动和呼吸结果。根据基线6分钟步行测试(6MWT: 1)对患者进行分类。结果:所有患者在基线时均可走动。通过6MWT评估的运动表现在所有功能组中都有所下降,但即使是基线时表现最差的患者(1-2组),在T15时也大多能走动(分别为50%和71%)。在基线时表现最好的患者中(第4组),受试者在T15时也保持相当高的表现值,在T10时观察到具有统计学意义的下降,在T15时稳定;没有人在T15失去行动能力。尽管总体FVC降低了%,但21/42例患者(50%)在T15时仍未使用呼吸机。没有ERT停药或重大不良事件的报道。结论:Alglucosidase alfa治疗从长期角度来看显示出不同的结果,证实了所有功能组的死亡率降低,并且一些患者的死亡率稳定,没有相关的安全性问题。运动和呼吸功能反应因功能组和单个患者而异,强调需要额外的结果测量。这些长期结果将有助于比较庞贝病新疗法可能的长期疗效。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field.
In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials.
Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.