Endoscopic Sub-Stent Dissection for Removal of Long-Term Embedded Esophageal Self-Expanding Metallic Stents.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Ke-Yi Guo, Li-Yun Ma, Zu-Qiang Liu, Li Wang, Pei-Rong Xu, Tao Tan, Xue-Feng Yan, Jian-Wei Hu, Ping-Hong Zhou, Hao Hu
{"title":"Endoscopic Sub-Stent Dissection for Removal of Long-Term Embedded Esophageal Self-Expanding Metallic Stents.","authors":"Ke-Yi Guo, Li-Yun Ma, Zu-Qiang Liu, Li Wang, Pei-Rong Xu, Tao Tan, Xue-Feng Yan, Jian-Wei Hu, Ping-Hong Zhou, Hao Hu","doi":"10.1111/jgh.17041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) have been extensively applied to manage esophageal disorders. The hyperplastic mucosal tissue induced by the stent can provide a good anchoring function but also make the stent removal difficult, especially after long-term placement. Here, we report a new technique, endoscopic sub-stent dissection, for removing the long-term embedded SEMS and assessing its safety and efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with long-term embedded esophageal SEMS who underwent endoscopic sub-stent dissection between July 2018 and September 2024 were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic characteristics, procedure-related parameters, adverse events, and long-term outcomes were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 patients with 17 embedded esophageal SEMS were included, where three patients had undergone a failed attempt using the stent-in-stent technique. Five patients (31.25%) were diagnosed with esophageal fistula, seven (43.75%) with stenosis, one (6.25%) with diverticulum, and three (18.75%) were placed for sealing the defects of endoscopic resection. Nine (52.94%) were partially covered SEMS (PCSEMS) and eight (47.06%) were fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS). The median stent retention time was 88.5 days (range, 28-1080). All embedded stents (100.0%) were successfully removed. The median procedure time was 26 min (range, 10-140). Procedure-related adverse events included one fever (6.25%) and one subcutaneous emphysema (6.25%). Three patients underwent outpatient surgery, and the median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days (range, 1-49).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic sub-stent dissection is relatively safe and effective for removing long-term embedded esophageal SEMS. Further study with a larger sample size is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.17041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) have been extensively applied to manage esophageal disorders. The hyperplastic mucosal tissue induced by the stent can provide a good anchoring function but also make the stent removal difficult, especially after long-term placement. Here, we report a new technique, endoscopic sub-stent dissection, for removing the long-term embedded SEMS and assessing its safety and efficacy.

Methods: Patients with long-term embedded esophageal SEMS who underwent endoscopic sub-stent dissection between July 2018 and September 2024 were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic characteristics, procedure-related parameters, adverse events, and long-term outcomes were investigated.

Results: A total of 16 patients with 17 embedded esophageal SEMS were included, where three patients had undergone a failed attempt using the stent-in-stent technique. Five patients (31.25%) were diagnosed with esophageal fistula, seven (43.75%) with stenosis, one (6.25%) with diverticulum, and three (18.75%) were placed for sealing the defects of endoscopic resection. Nine (52.94%) were partially covered SEMS (PCSEMS) and eight (47.06%) were fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS). The median stent retention time was 88.5 days (range, 28-1080). All embedded stents (100.0%) were successfully removed. The median procedure time was 26 min (range, 10-140). Procedure-related adverse events included one fever (6.25%) and one subcutaneous emphysema (6.25%). Three patients underwent outpatient surgery, and the median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days (range, 1-49).

Conclusions: Endoscopic sub-stent dissection is relatively safe and effective for removing long-term embedded esophageal SEMS. Further study with a larger sample size is warranted.

内镜下支架夹层去除长期埋置食管自扩张金属支架。
背景与目的:自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)已广泛应用于食管疾病的治疗。支架诱导的粘膜组织增生可以提供良好的锚定功能,但也使支架移除困难,特别是长期放置后。在这里,我们报告了一种新的技术,内镜下支架夹层,用于移除长期嵌入的SEMS并评估其安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性分析2018年7月至2024年9月行内镜下支架剥离的长期埋置食管SEMS患者。调查了人口统计学特征、手术相关参数、不良事件和长期结果。结果:共纳入16例17例食管SEMS埋置术,其中3例采用支架内支架技术失败。诊断为食管瘘5例(31.25%),狭窄7例(43.75%),憩室1例(6.25%),封闭内镜切除缺陷3例(18.75%)。部分覆盖的SEMS (PCSEMS) 9例(52.94%),完全覆盖的SEMS (fcems) 8例(47.06%)。中位支架保留时间为88.5天(范围28-1080)。所有嵌入支架(100.0%)均成功取出。手术时间中位数为26分钟(范围10-140分钟)。手术相关不良事件包括1例发热(6.25%)和1例皮下肺气肿(6.25%)。3例患者接受门诊手术,术后中位住院时间为3天(范围1-49天)。结论:内镜下支架清扫术是切除长期埋置食管SEMS较为安全有效的方法。更大样本量的进一步研究是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信