Characterizing Moment-to-Moment Variability in Readiness to Live: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Investigation of Readiness to Live, Wish to Live, and Suicidal Desire.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jessica L Gerner, Evan A Albury, Max Stivers, Emma H Moscardini, Peter C Britton, Raymond P Tucker
{"title":"Characterizing Moment-to-Moment Variability in Readiness to Live: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Investigation of Readiness to Live, Wish to Live, and Suicidal Desire.","authors":"Jessica L Gerner, Evan A Albury, Max Stivers, Emma H Moscardini, Peter C Britton, Raymond P Tucker","doi":"10.1002/jclp.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Readiness to live (RTL) is a protective factor against suicidal thoughts and behaviors. It encompasses one's motivation to live and take steps towards staying alive. It is relatively stable, predicting lower odds of suicidal ideation at one- to 6-month follow-ups. However, little is known about its short-term stability. Research is needed to describe the construct and compare it to similar protective factors, like wish to live (WTL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>College undergraduates (N = 51), selectively recruited for endorsing past 2-week suicidal desire, completed surveys (5/day for 10 days) on their smart phones. Descriptive and variability statistics of RTL, WTL, and suicidal desire were conducted. Multi-level models were used to determine if RTL is associated with suicidal desire concurrently and prospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>78.4% (n = 40) of participants indicated a change in RTL over the study period and RTL demonstrated greater stability than WTL and suicidal desire. RTL was associated with suicidal desire concurrently, but not prospectively, while WTL remained associated both concurrently and prospectively.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The sample included only undergraduate college students, limiting generalizability to more diverse samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results demonstrate that RTL remains relatively stable over short time scales. While RTL and WTL are similar, the constructs are not redundant, with each providing unique information that may aid in treatment planning. Future research should replicate these findings in samples with more severe suicidal desire and extend them to suicidal behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.70010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Readiness to live (RTL) is a protective factor against suicidal thoughts and behaviors. It encompasses one's motivation to live and take steps towards staying alive. It is relatively stable, predicting lower odds of suicidal ideation at one- to 6-month follow-ups. However, little is known about its short-term stability. Research is needed to describe the construct and compare it to similar protective factors, like wish to live (WTL).

Methods: College undergraduates (N = 51), selectively recruited for endorsing past 2-week suicidal desire, completed surveys (5/day for 10 days) on their smart phones. Descriptive and variability statistics of RTL, WTL, and suicidal desire were conducted. Multi-level models were used to determine if RTL is associated with suicidal desire concurrently and prospectively.

Results: 78.4% (n = 40) of participants indicated a change in RTL over the study period and RTL demonstrated greater stability than WTL and suicidal desire. RTL was associated with suicidal desire concurrently, but not prospectively, while WTL remained associated both concurrently and prospectively.

Limitations: The sample included only undergraduate college students, limiting generalizability to more diverse samples.

Conclusions: Results demonstrate that RTL remains relatively stable over short time scales. While RTL and WTL are similar, the constructs are not redundant, with each providing unique information that may aid in treatment planning. Future research should replicate these findings in samples with more severe suicidal desire and extend them to suicidal behavior.

表征生活准备中的瞬间变化:对生活准备、生活愿望和自杀欲望的生态瞬间评估调查。
生活准备(RTL)是防止自杀想法和行为的保护因素。它包含了一个人活下去的动机和为活下去而采取的步骤。这是相对稳定的,预测在一到六个月的随访中出现自杀意念的几率较低。然而,人们对它的短期稳定性知之甚少。需要研究描述这种结构,并将其与类似的保护因素,如生存愿望(WTL)进行比较。方法:有选择地招募51名大学生(N = 51),对过去2周的自杀欲望进行认同,并使用智能手机完成问卷调查(每天5次,共10天)。对RTL、WTL和自杀意愿进行描述性和变异性统计。采用多层次模型来确定RTL是否与自杀欲望同时和前瞻性相关。结果:78.4% (n = 40)的参与者表示在研究期间RTL发生了变化,RTL比WTL和自杀欲望表现出更大的稳定性。RTL与自杀欲望同时相关,但不具有前瞻性,而WTL与自杀欲望同时相关且具有前瞻性。局限性:样本仅包括本科大学生,限制了推广到更多样化的样本。结论:结果表明RTL在短时间内保持相对稳定。虽然RTL和WTL是相似的,但结构不是多余的,每个结构都提供独特的信息,可以帮助制定治疗计划。未来的研究应该在更严重的自杀欲望样本中复制这些发现,并将其扩展到自杀行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信