Artificial intelligence performance in pediatric asthma.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Ece Senbaykal Yigit, Ilke Taskirdi, Idil Akay Haci, Tuba Tuncel
{"title":"Artificial intelligence performance in pediatric asthma.","authors":"Ece Senbaykal Yigit, Ilke Taskirdi, Idil Akay Haci, Tuba Tuncel","doi":"10.1080/02770903.2025.2531500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Asthma is the most common chronic disease of childhood, characterized by symptoms such as wheezing, shortness of breath, and coughing. With the advancement of technology, artificial intelligence (AI) applications are increasingly being used in various fields, among which ChatGPT is one of the most widely utilized. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability, quality, and readability of the answers provided by the ChatGPT-4o application to questions related to pediatric asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ChatGPT-4o application was used to record answers to 25 of the most frequently asked questions about asthma in children. To determine the quality and reliability of the answers, we used the Global Quality Scale and modified DISCERN tool. We tested readability using seven indices: Automated Readability Index, Flesch Reading Ease Score, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Fog Readability Index, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Coleman-Liau Readability Index, and Linsear Write Formula.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The answers provided by the ChatGPT-4o application to questions about childhood asthma were found to have good reliability (88% by the first evaluator and 84% by the second evaluator) and high quality (88% by both evaluators). The application scored 10.77 ± 1.58 on the FKGL scale, and in conjunction with the other indices, the results indicated that the answers required a high level of reading proficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Artificial intelligence can be a reliable tool for parents in providing information about pediatric asthma. However, these findings suggest that readability issues may hinder the clinical application of AI-generated content in asthma diagnosis and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2025.2531500","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Asthma is the most common chronic disease of childhood, characterized by symptoms such as wheezing, shortness of breath, and coughing. With the advancement of technology, artificial intelligence (AI) applications are increasingly being used in various fields, among which ChatGPT is one of the most widely utilized. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability, quality, and readability of the answers provided by the ChatGPT-4o application to questions related to pediatric asthma.

Methods: The ChatGPT-4o application was used to record answers to 25 of the most frequently asked questions about asthma in children. To determine the quality and reliability of the answers, we used the Global Quality Scale and modified DISCERN tool. We tested readability using seven indices: Automated Readability Index, Flesch Reading Ease Score, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Fog Readability Index, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Coleman-Liau Readability Index, and Linsear Write Formula.

Results: The answers provided by the ChatGPT-4o application to questions about childhood asthma were found to have good reliability (88% by the first evaluator and 84% by the second evaluator) and high quality (88% by both evaluators). The application scored 10.77 ± 1.58 on the FKGL scale, and in conjunction with the other indices, the results indicated that the answers required a high level of reading proficiency.

Conclusions: Artificial intelligence can be a reliable tool for parents in providing information about pediatric asthma. However, these findings suggest that readability issues may hinder the clinical application of AI-generated content in asthma diagnosis and treatment.

人工智能在儿童哮喘中的表现。
目的:哮喘是儿童最常见的慢性疾病,以喘息、呼吸短促和咳嗽等症状为特征。随着科技的进步,人工智能应用越来越多地应用于各个领域,ChatGPT是其中应用最广泛的一种。本研究的目的是评估chatgpt - 40应用程序对儿童哮喘相关问题提供的答案的可靠性、质量和可读性。方法:使用chatgpt - 40应用程序记录关于儿童哮喘的25个最常见问题的答案。为了确定答案的可靠性,我们使用了全球质量量表和改进的辨别工具。我们使用7个指标来测试可读性:自动可读性指数、Flesch阅读易用性评分、Flesch- kincaid等级水平、Gunning Fog可读性指数、简单测量的Gobbledygook、Coleman-Liau可读性指数和Linsear写公式。结果:chatgpt - 40应用程序提供的关于儿童哮喘问题的答案具有良好的可靠性(第一评估者88%,第二评估者84%)和高质量(两位评估者88%)。该应用程序在Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level量表上的得分为10.77 ± 1.58,结合其他指标,结果表明答案需要较高的阅读水平。结论:人工智能可作为家长提供儿童哮喘信息的可靠工具。然而,这些发现表明,可读性问题可能会阻碍人工智能生成内容在哮喘诊断和治疗中的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma
Journal of Asthma 医学-过敏
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Providing an authoritative open forum on asthma and related conditions, Journal of Asthma publishes clinical research around such topics as asthma management, critical and long-term care, preventative measures, environmental counselling, and patient education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信