Systematic review and meta-analysis of current guidelines, and their evidence base, on risk of renal function after administration of contrast medium for diabetic patients receiving metformin.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2025.1547725
Qinhui Xu, Weixing Huang, Qianyun Li, Tongan Bao, Hua Luo, Xiao Luo
{"title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis of current guidelines, and their evidence base, on risk of renal function after administration of contrast medium for diabetic patients receiving metformin.","authors":"Qinhui Xu, Weixing Huang, Qianyun Li, Tongan Bao, Hua Luo, Xiao Luo","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1547725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our study aimed to determine through a meta-analysis whether continuing metformin use in diabetic patients receiving contrast agents would increase the risk of renal impairment and metabolic abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the PubMed, EBSCO, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from the inception dates to March 2024. The included studies comparing metformin users and non-users during contrast agent administration in diabetic patients. Outcome measures included contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), lactate level, and incidence of metabolic acidosis. We used odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes and weighted or standardized mean difference (WMD or SMD) for continuous outcomes, depending on scale consistency across studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis involved 2 randomized controlled trials and 5 retrospective cohorts comprising 2020 patients. There were no significant differences between the metformin and non-metformin groups in CI-AKI incidence (OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.63-1.20), changes in renal function (serum creatinine: SMD: -0.15, 95% CI: -0.64-0.35; eGFR: WMD: 3.35, 95% CI: -1.60-8.29), incidence of metabolic acidosis (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.57-1.43), and lactate levels (SMD: 0.29, 95% CI: -0.53-1.11). Sensitivity analysis excluding one study revealed a significant reduction in creatinine with metformin. Logistic regression meta-analysis showed that metformin use was not significantly associated with CI-AKI or metabolic acidosis, while contrast volume was the only consistent predictor of CI-AKI. Lower baseline CO<sub>2</sub> was independently associated with increased risk of metabolic acidosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis indicates that continuing metformin during contrast agent administration does not increase the risk of CI-AKI, acidosis, or eGFR compared to discontinuation or non-use of metformin. Additionally, continuation of metformin may be associated with a modest reduction in serum creatinine levels after contrast exposure. However, the limited quality of included studies may weaken the strength of these conclusions.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023459602, identifier: CRD42023459602.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1547725"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12241009/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1547725","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Our study aimed to determine through a meta-analysis whether continuing metformin use in diabetic patients receiving contrast agents would increase the risk of renal impairment and metabolic abnormalities.

Methods: We searched the PubMed, EBSCO, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from the inception dates to March 2024. The included studies comparing metformin users and non-users during contrast agent administration in diabetic patients. Outcome measures included contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), lactate level, and incidence of metabolic acidosis. We used odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes and weighted or standardized mean difference (WMD or SMD) for continuous outcomes, depending on scale consistency across studies.

Results: Analysis involved 2 randomized controlled trials and 5 retrospective cohorts comprising 2020 patients. There were no significant differences between the metformin and non-metformin groups in CI-AKI incidence (OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.63-1.20), changes in renal function (serum creatinine: SMD: -0.15, 95% CI: -0.64-0.35; eGFR: WMD: 3.35, 95% CI: -1.60-8.29), incidence of metabolic acidosis (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.57-1.43), and lactate levels (SMD: 0.29, 95% CI: -0.53-1.11). Sensitivity analysis excluding one study revealed a significant reduction in creatinine with metformin. Logistic regression meta-analysis showed that metformin use was not significantly associated with CI-AKI or metabolic acidosis, while contrast volume was the only consistent predictor of CI-AKI. Lower baseline CO2 was independently associated with increased risk of metabolic acidosis.

Conclusions: Our analysis indicates that continuing metformin during contrast agent administration does not increase the risk of CI-AKI, acidosis, or eGFR compared to discontinuation or non-use of metformin. Additionally, continuation of metformin may be associated with a modest reduction in serum creatinine levels after contrast exposure. However, the limited quality of included studies may weaken the strength of these conclusions.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023459602, identifier: CRD42023459602.

对接受二甲双胍的糖尿病患者使用造影剂后肾功能风险的现行指南及其证据基础进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本研究旨在通过荟萃分析确定接受对比剂治疗的糖尿病患者继续使用二甲双胍是否会增加肾脏损害和代谢异常的风险。方法:我们检索了PubMed、EBSCO、Medline和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(Central Register of Controlled Trials),检索时间为研究成立日期至2024年3月。纳入的研究比较了糖尿病患者在使用对比剂期间使用二甲双胍和不使用二甲双胍的患者。结果测量包括造影剂诱导的急性肾损伤(CI-AKI)、血清肌酐、估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、乳酸水平和代谢性酸中毒发生率。根据不同研究的量表一致性,我们对二分类结果使用比值比(OR),对连续结果使用加权或标准化平均差(WMD或SMD)。结果:分析涉及2个随机对照试验和5个回顾性队列,包括2020例患者。二甲双胍组和非二甲双胍组在CI- aki发生率(OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.63-1.20)、肾功能改变(血清肌酐:SMD: -0.15, 95% CI: -0.64-0.35;eGFR: WMD: 3.35, 95% CI: -1.60-8.29),代谢性酸中毒发生率(OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.57-1.43)和乳酸水平(SMD: 0.29, 95% CI: -0.53-1.11)。除一项研究外的敏感性分析显示二甲双胍显著降低肌酐。Logistic回归荟萃分析显示,使用二甲双胍与CI-AKI或代谢性酸中毒没有显著相关性,而造影剂体积是CI-AKI唯一一致的预测因子。较低的CO2基线与代谢性酸中毒风险增加独立相关。结论:我们的分析表明,与停用或不使用二甲双胍相比,在使用造影剂期间继续使用二甲双胍不会增加CI-AKI、酸中毒或eGFR的风险。此外,继续使用二甲双胍可能与造影剂暴露后血清肌酐水平的适度降低有关。然而,纳入研究的有限质量可能会削弱这些结论的强度。系统评价注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023459602,标识符:CRD42023459602。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信