Differential Muscle Activation During Sustained Chin-Tuck Against Resistance (CTAR) Contraction is Consistent Across Different Instructional Conditions in Older Adults.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Hsiao-Dien Huang, François-Xavier Brajot, Hsin-I Wang, Der-Sheng Han
{"title":"Differential Muscle Activation During Sustained Chin-Tuck Against Resistance (CTAR) Contraction is Consistent Across Different Instructional Conditions in Older Adults.","authors":"Hsiao-Dien Huang, François-Xavier Brajot, Hsin-I Wang, Der-Sheng Han","doi":"10.1007/s00455-025-10859-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The chin tuck against resistance (CTAR) is a popular exercise targeting suprahyoid muscles involved in swallowing. Its effectiveness presumably relies on proper execution. This study assessed the effect of different instructional strategies on neck muscle activation in older adults executing a sustained CTAR contraction. Ninety healthy individuals aged 65 to 90 years old were randomly assigned to one of three groups: video-only, video plus verbal instruction, or video with visual biofeedback using surface electromyography (sEMG). Surrogate measures of muscle recruitment and fatigue within both the suprahyoid and sternocleidomastoid muscles were compared across the three instructional groups. The sEMG amplitude measures were normalized with respect to maximal jaw opening and head rotation. Suprahyoid activity was significantly higher than sternocleidomastoid in terms of both normalized amplitude and fatigue. An analysis of variance failed to show significant differences in either sEMG measures as a function of instructional strategy, although the distribution of responses with biofeedback was significantly more clustered around the group mean (i.e. leptokurtic). The effects of sustained CTAR contractions on suprahyoid activity remain consistent across different instructional strategies, suggesting the technique is a robust one. Biofeedback does seem to improve groupwise performance predictability, however. Future studies should explore longitudinal effects to determine whether instructional strategy may affect outcomes over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dysphagia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-025-10859-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The chin tuck against resistance (CTAR) is a popular exercise targeting suprahyoid muscles involved in swallowing. Its effectiveness presumably relies on proper execution. This study assessed the effect of different instructional strategies on neck muscle activation in older adults executing a sustained CTAR contraction. Ninety healthy individuals aged 65 to 90 years old were randomly assigned to one of three groups: video-only, video plus verbal instruction, or video with visual biofeedback using surface electromyography (sEMG). Surrogate measures of muscle recruitment and fatigue within both the suprahyoid and sternocleidomastoid muscles were compared across the three instructional groups. The sEMG amplitude measures were normalized with respect to maximal jaw opening and head rotation. Suprahyoid activity was significantly higher than sternocleidomastoid in terms of both normalized amplitude and fatigue. An analysis of variance failed to show significant differences in either sEMG measures as a function of instructional strategy, although the distribution of responses with biofeedback was significantly more clustered around the group mean (i.e. leptokurtic). The effects of sustained CTAR contractions on suprahyoid activity remain consistent across different instructional strategies, suggesting the technique is a robust one. Biofeedback does seem to improve groupwise performance predictability, however. Future studies should explore longitudinal effects to determine whether instructional strategy may affect outcomes over time.

在不同的指导条件下,老年人在持续的抗阻力下颚收腹(CTAR)收缩过程中不同的肌肉激活是一致的。
收下巴抗阻力(CTAR)是一种针对与吞咽有关的舌骨上肌肉的流行运动。其有效性大概依赖于适当的执行。本研究评估了不同的教学策略对执行持续CTAR收缩的老年人颈部肌肉激活的影响。90名年龄在65岁至90岁之间的健康个体被随机分配到三组中的一组:仅视频组、视频加口头指导组和使用表面肌电图(sEMG)的视觉生物反馈组。在三个教学组中比较舌骨上肌和胸锁乳突肌的肌肉恢复和疲劳的替代测量。表面肌电信号振幅测量是标准化的关于最大颌开口和头部旋转。舌骨上活动在标准化幅度和疲劳方面明显高于胸锁乳突肌。方差分析未能显示两种表面肌电信号测量作为教学策略的功能有显著差异,尽管生物反馈的反应分布明显更多地聚集在组均值周围(即弱峰)。持续的CTAR收缩对舌骨上活动的影响在不同的教学策略中保持一致,表明该技术是一种强大的技术。然而,生物反馈似乎确实提高了群体表现的可预测性。未来的研究应该探索纵向效应,以确定教学策略是否会随着时间的推移影响结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dysphagia
Dysphagia 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dysphagia aims to serve as a voice for the benefit of the patient. The journal is devoted exclusively to swallowing and its disorders. The purpose of the journal is to provide a source of information to the flourishing dysphagia community. Over the past years, the field of dysphagia has grown rapidly, and the community of dysphagia researchers have galvanized with ambition to represent dysphagia patients. In addition to covering a myriad of disciplines in medicine and speech pathology, the following topics are also covered, but are not limited to: bio-engineering, deglutition, esophageal motility, immunology, and neuro-gastroenterology. The journal aims to foster a growing need for further dysphagia investigation, to disseminate knowledge through research, and to stimulate communication among interested professionals. The journal publishes original papers, technical and instrumental notes, letters to the editor, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信