Enhanced collagenogenesis on three-dimensionally printed titanium surfaces by human gingival fibroblasts: An in vitro study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Biointerphases Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1116/6.0004500
Vitor de Toledo Stuani, Isabela Sanches Pompeo da Silva, Gustavo Gonçalves do Prado Manfredi, Fernanda Balestrero Cassiano, Larissa Alamo, Ligia Espoliar Corrêa, Jamil Awad Shibli, Carlos Alberto de Souza Costa, Diana Gabriela Soares
{"title":"Enhanced collagenogenesis on three-dimensionally printed titanium surfaces by human gingival fibroblasts: An in vitro study.","authors":"Vitor de Toledo Stuani, Isabela Sanches Pompeo da Silva, Gustavo Gonçalves do Prado Manfredi, Fernanda Balestrero Cassiano, Larissa Alamo, Ligia Espoliar Corrêa, Jamil Awad Shibli, Carlos Alberto de Souza Costa, Diana Gabriela Soares","doi":"10.1116/6.0004500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The lack of cementum in peri-implant tissues leads to a deficiency in anchorage points for gingival collagen fibers. This arrangement is linked to reduced protective capabilities compared to teeth. Therefore, there is a pressing need to develop surfaces that optimize the interaction between soft tissue and implants. 3D-printed titanium disks (Ti3DP), machined disks (TiMC), and glass coverslips (GS) were seeded with human gingival fibroblasts. These specimens underwent mechanical characterization via roughness and wettability assays. Biological characterization included assessments of cellular viability (live/dead), adhesion and spreading (F-actin), cell count (DAPI), cellular metabolism (Alamar blue), adhesive strength, and soluble collagen and total protein quantification up to 14 days. Data analysis employed Student's t-test and ANOVA post-hoc Tukey test (α = 0.05). The group TiMC exhibited higher hydrophilicity and lower roughness compared to Ti3DP. All groups demonstrated cellular viability throughout the study period. Adhesive strength did not significantly differ among groups; however, cell count was higher in TiMC and GS after one day of cell seeding in comparison to Ti3DP. Morphologically, GS and TiMC displayed more fusiform cells with a uniform distribution, while Ti3DP showed smaller, irregular cells with multiple lamellipodia and filopodia. Additionally, statistically superior collagen and total protein deposition was observed in Ti3DP (p < 0.01). The 3D-printed titanium surface allowed human gingival fibroblasts to adhere to it, leading to a 3D cytoskeleton morphology that culminated in increased collagen expression. Therefore, these 3D-printed devices present a promising avenue for producing transmucosal components due to their increase in collagen production.</p>","PeriodicalId":9053,"journal":{"name":"Biointerphases","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biointerphases","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1116/6.0004500","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The lack of cementum in peri-implant tissues leads to a deficiency in anchorage points for gingival collagen fibers. This arrangement is linked to reduced protective capabilities compared to teeth. Therefore, there is a pressing need to develop surfaces that optimize the interaction between soft tissue and implants. 3D-printed titanium disks (Ti3DP), machined disks (TiMC), and glass coverslips (GS) were seeded with human gingival fibroblasts. These specimens underwent mechanical characterization via roughness and wettability assays. Biological characterization included assessments of cellular viability (live/dead), adhesion and spreading (F-actin), cell count (DAPI), cellular metabolism (Alamar blue), adhesive strength, and soluble collagen and total protein quantification up to 14 days. Data analysis employed Student's t-test and ANOVA post-hoc Tukey test (α = 0.05). The group TiMC exhibited higher hydrophilicity and lower roughness compared to Ti3DP. All groups demonstrated cellular viability throughout the study period. Adhesive strength did not significantly differ among groups; however, cell count was higher in TiMC and GS after one day of cell seeding in comparison to Ti3DP. Morphologically, GS and TiMC displayed more fusiform cells with a uniform distribution, while Ti3DP showed smaller, irregular cells with multiple lamellipodia and filopodia. Additionally, statistically superior collagen and total protein deposition was observed in Ti3DP (p < 0.01). The 3D-printed titanium surface allowed human gingival fibroblasts to adhere to it, leading to a 3D cytoskeleton morphology that culminated in increased collagen expression. Therefore, these 3D-printed devices present a promising avenue for producing transmucosal components due to their increase in collagen production.

人牙龈成纤维细胞增强三维打印钛表面胶原生成的体外研究。
种植体周围组织缺乏牙骨质导致牙龈胶原纤维的支固点不足。这种排列与牙齿相比,保护能力较弱有关。因此,迫切需要开发优化软组织和植入物之间相互作用的表面。3d打印钛盘(Ti3DP)、加工盘(TiMC)和玻璃盖(GS)植入人牙龈成纤维细胞。这些标本通过粗糙度和润湿性分析进行了力学表征。生物学特性包括评估细胞活力(活/死)、粘附和扩散(F-actin)、细胞计数(DAPI)、细胞代谢(Alamar蓝)、粘附强度、可溶性胶原蛋白和总蛋白定量,持续14天。数据分析采用Student’st检验和方差分析(ANOVA)后设Tukey检验(α = 0.05)。与Ti3DP相比,TiMC具有更高的亲水性和更低的粗糙度。在整个研究期间,所有组均表现出细胞活力。各组间黏附强度无显著差异;然而,与Ti3DP相比,TiMC和GS在细胞播种1天后的细胞计数更高。形态学上,GS和TiMC以梭状细胞为主,分布均匀,而Ti3DP细胞较小,不规则,有多个板足和丝状足。此外,在统计学上,Ti3DP组的胶原蛋白和总蛋白沉积更优越(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biointerphases
Biointerphases 生物-材料科学:生物材料
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Biointerphases emphasizes quantitative characterization of biomaterials and biological interfaces. As an interdisciplinary journal, a strong foundation of chemistry, physics, biology, engineering, theory, and/or modelling is incorporated into originated articles, reviews, and opinionated essays. In addition to regular submissions, the journal regularly features In Focus sections, targeted on specific topics and edited by experts in the field. Biointerphases is an international journal with excellence in scientific peer-review. Biointerphases is indexed in PubMed and the Science Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics). Accepted papers appear online immediately after proof processing and are uploaded to key citation sources daily. The journal is based on a mixed subscription and open-access model: Typically, authors can publish without any page charges but if the authors wish to publish open access, they can do so for a modest fee. Topics include: bio-surface modification nano-bio interface protein-surface interactions cell-surface interactions in vivo and in vitro systems biofilms / biofouling biosensors / biodiagnostics bio on a chip coatings interface spectroscopy biotribology / biorheology molecular recognition ambient diagnostic methods interface modelling adhesion phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信