Early contingency information enhances human punishment sensitivity when punishment is frequent but not rare.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Kelly Gaetani, Philip Jean-Richard-Dit-Bressel, Gavan P McNally
{"title":"Early contingency information enhances human punishment sensitivity when punishment is frequent but not rare.","authors":"Kelly Gaetani, Philip Jean-Richard-Dit-Bressel, Gavan P McNally","doi":"10.1037/bne0000627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals differ in sensitivity to the adverse consequences of their actions. We have shown that these differences can be linked to differences in correctly learning causal relationships between actions and their negative consequences. To further assess this, here we used a conditioned punishment task in 195 participants. Explicit punishment contingency information was provided before or after participants had experienced strong (40%) or weak (10%) punishment contingencies. We found the same phenotypes of human punishment learning reported previously (Jean-Richard-Dit-Bressel et al., 2021; Jean-Richard-Dit-Bressel et al., 2023). Early provision of punishment contingency information promoted punishment avoidance under strong punishment contingencies but was relatively ineffective under weak punishment contingencies. This persistent punishment insensitivity despite early contingency information was not due to habit learning or failure to understand the associative task structure. Rather, persistent insensitivity to punishment was due to a failure in integrating punishment contingency knowledge with action selection. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":8739,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral neuroscience","volume":"139 4-5","pages":"216-228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bne0000627","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals differ in sensitivity to the adverse consequences of their actions. We have shown that these differences can be linked to differences in correctly learning causal relationships between actions and their negative consequences. To further assess this, here we used a conditioned punishment task in 195 participants. Explicit punishment contingency information was provided before or after participants had experienced strong (40%) or weak (10%) punishment contingencies. We found the same phenotypes of human punishment learning reported previously (Jean-Richard-Dit-Bressel et al., 2021; Jean-Richard-Dit-Bressel et al., 2023). Early provision of punishment contingency information promoted punishment avoidance under strong punishment contingencies but was relatively ineffective under weak punishment contingencies. This persistent punishment insensitivity despite early contingency information was not due to habit learning or failure to understand the associative task structure. Rather, persistent insensitivity to punishment was due to a failure in integrating punishment contingency knowledge with action selection. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

当惩罚频繁但不罕见时,早期偶然性信息增强了人类的惩罚敏感性。
个人对其行为的不良后果的敏感程度各不相同。我们已经证明,这些差异可能与正确学习行为及其负面后果之间因果关系的差异有关。为了进一步评估这一点,我们在195名参与者中使用了条件惩罚任务。明确的惩罚偶然性信息在参与者经历强(40%)或弱(10%)惩罚偶然性之前或之后提供。我们发现了先前报道的人类惩罚学习的相同表型(Jean-Richard-Dit-Bressel et al., 2021;Jean-Richard-Dit-Bressel等人,2023)。在强惩罚权变条件下,早期提供惩罚权变信息促进了惩罚回避,而在弱惩罚权变条件下,早期提供惩罚权变信息效果相对较差。尽管有早期偶然性信息,但这种持续的惩罚不敏感不是由于习惯学习或未能理解联想任务结构。相反,对惩罚的持续不敏感是由于未能将惩罚权变知识与行动选择结合起来。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioral neuroscience
Behavioral neuroscience 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioral Neuroscience publishes original research articles as well as reviews in the broad field of the neural bases of behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信