Toward a macroevolutionary understanding of live-leaf flammability in plant species of fire-prone forests.

IF 2.4 2区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Brad R Murray, Lyndle K Hardstaff, Megan L Murray, Zoe A Xirocostas
{"title":"Toward a macroevolutionary understanding of live-leaf flammability in plant species of fire-prone forests.","authors":"Brad R Murray, Lyndle K Hardstaff, Megan L Murray, Zoe A Xirocostas","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Premise: </strong>The flammability of live leaves in canopies varies considerably among plant species. Identifying macroevolutionary processes that shape variation in leaf flammability contributes to an understanding of the phylogenetic underpinnings of wildfire dynamics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a phylogenetic comparative approach to examine the macroevolution of live-leaf flammability in 75 plant species of fire-prone dry sclerophyll forests in eastern Australia. We estimated phylogenetic signal in leaf flammability, fitted a series of evolutionary models to test macroevolutionary hypotheses about leaf flammability, and assessed evolutionary correlations between leaf flammability and leaf water content (LWC), leaf mass per area (LMA), leaf area (LA), plant growth form, and fire response strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We detected weak phylogenetic signal, indicating that leaf flammability exhibited greater variation among closely related species than would be expected under phylogenetic conservatism. The evolution of leaf flammability was equally well described by an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model and a Pagel's δ model, implying weak stabilizing selection and an acceleration in leaf flammability evolution over time. We found significant evolutionary correlations such that high leaf flammability was related to low LWC, low LMA, and large LA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results show that live-leaf flammability is an evolutionarily labile trait in plant species of fire-prone forests. We suggest that the evolution of the three leaf traits in response to prevailing environmental conditions (such as LWC to water availability, LA to light capture, and LMA to herbivore defence) provide antagonistic selective forces that produce a macroevolutionary pattern of weak stabilising selection on leaf flammability.</p>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":" ","pages":"e70073"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.70073","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Premise: The flammability of live leaves in canopies varies considerably among plant species. Identifying macroevolutionary processes that shape variation in leaf flammability contributes to an understanding of the phylogenetic underpinnings of wildfire dynamics.

Methods: We used a phylogenetic comparative approach to examine the macroevolution of live-leaf flammability in 75 plant species of fire-prone dry sclerophyll forests in eastern Australia. We estimated phylogenetic signal in leaf flammability, fitted a series of evolutionary models to test macroevolutionary hypotheses about leaf flammability, and assessed evolutionary correlations between leaf flammability and leaf water content (LWC), leaf mass per area (LMA), leaf area (LA), plant growth form, and fire response strategy.

Results: We detected weak phylogenetic signal, indicating that leaf flammability exhibited greater variation among closely related species than would be expected under phylogenetic conservatism. The evolution of leaf flammability was equally well described by an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model and a Pagel's δ model, implying weak stabilizing selection and an acceleration in leaf flammability evolution over time. We found significant evolutionary correlations such that high leaf flammability was related to low LWC, low LMA, and large LA.

Conclusions: Our results show that live-leaf flammability is an evolutionarily labile trait in plant species of fire-prone forests. We suggest that the evolution of the three leaf traits in response to prevailing environmental conditions (such as LWC to water availability, LA to light capture, and LMA to herbivore defence) provide antagonistic selective forces that produce a macroevolutionary pattern of weak stabilising selection on leaf flammability.

对易火森林植物物种活叶可燃性的宏观进化理解。
前提:树冠活叶的可燃性在不同的植物物种之间差别很大。确定塑造叶片可燃性变化的宏观进化过程有助于理解野火动力学的系统发育基础。方法:采用系统发育比较的方法,研究了澳大利亚东部75种易发生火灾的干硬叶林植物的活叶可燃性的宏观进化。我们估计了叶片可燃性的系统发育信号,拟合了一系列进化模型来验证关于叶片可燃性的宏观进化假设,并评估了叶片可燃性与叶片含水量(LWC)、叶面积质量(LMA)、叶面积(LA)、植物生长形态和火灾响应策略之间的进化相关性。结果:我们检测到微弱的系统发育信号,表明叶片可燃性在密切相关的物种之间表现出比系统发育保守性预期的更大的差异。Ornstein-Uhlenbeck模型和Pagel的δ模型同样很好地描述了叶片可燃性的进化,这意味着随着时间的推移,叶片可燃性的进化是弱稳定选择和加速的。我们发现了显著的进化相关性,如高叶片可燃性与低LWC、低LMA和大LA相关。结论:我们的研究结果表明,活叶可燃性是易火森林植物物种的一种进化不稳定性状。我们认为,三种叶片性状的进化响应于当时的环境条件(如LWC对水分供应的响应,LA对光捕获的响应,LMA对食草动物防御的响应)提供了拮抗选择力,产生了叶片可燃性弱稳定选择的宏观进化模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Botany
American Journal of Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
171
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Botany (AJB), the flagship journal of the Botanical Society of America (BSA), publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). AJB requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of major questions of plant biology. In general, papers that are too narrowly focused, purely descriptive, natural history, broad surveys, or that contain only preliminary data will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信