The Health Status of Pilots Over Age 60 at a Japanese Airline.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Kazunori Takazoe, Hideho Gomi
{"title":"The Health Status of Pilots Over Age 60 at a Japanese Airline.","authors":"Kazunori Takazoe, Hideho Gomi","doi":"10.3357/AMHP.6582.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study examines the health status of pilots above age 60 and its impact on the workforce, focusing on those not returning to work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pilots from a major Japanese airline reaching age 60 between 2008-2013 were studied for the subsequent 5 yr (\"senior pilots\"). Disqualifying diseases, application for Aviation Medical Review Board (AMRB), disposition, and grounding periods during the 5 yr were compared with those of a pilot cohort reaching age 55 during the same period (\"non-senior pilots\").</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 263 senior and 202 non-senior pilots. For AMRB cases, cardiovascular diseases were significantly more common in senior pilots compared with non-senior pilots (10.3 vs. 4.0%, respectively). Senior pilots were less likely to apply for AMRB (9.9 vs. 3.5%) or return to work, i.e., the sum of those who were denied by and who did not apply for AMRB (12.2 vs. 5.0%) and also had a higher incidence of cardiovascular diseases (4.6 vs. 1.0%). The grounding period of those not returning to work within the 5-yr study period was significantly longer than the temporary grounding period in both groups of pilots (senior: 22.3 ± 15.7 vs. 6.3 ± 4.7 mo; non-senior: 24.2 ± 17.2 vs. 7.5 ± 8.6 mo, as mean ± SD, respectively).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Medical disqualification in senior pilots is more frequent than with younger pilots and may have a greater impact on crew availability. Looking at ways of increasing the number of older pilots returning to work would benefit crew availability as would a focus on the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Takazoe K, Gomi H. The health status of pilots over age 60 at a Japanese airline. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2025; 96(5):392-398.</p>","PeriodicalId":7463,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","volume":"96 5","pages":"392-398"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6582.2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study examines the health status of pilots above age 60 and its impact on the workforce, focusing on those not returning to work.

Methods: Pilots from a major Japanese airline reaching age 60 between 2008-2013 were studied for the subsequent 5 yr ("senior pilots"). Disqualifying diseases, application for Aviation Medical Review Board (AMRB), disposition, and grounding periods during the 5 yr were compared with those of a pilot cohort reaching age 55 during the same period ("non-senior pilots").

Results: There were 263 senior and 202 non-senior pilots. For AMRB cases, cardiovascular diseases were significantly more common in senior pilots compared with non-senior pilots (10.3 vs. 4.0%, respectively). Senior pilots were less likely to apply for AMRB (9.9 vs. 3.5%) or return to work, i.e., the sum of those who were denied by and who did not apply for AMRB (12.2 vs. 5.0%) and also had a higher incidence of cardiovascular diseases (4.6 vs. 1.0%). The grounding period of those not returning to work within the 5-yr study period was significantly longer than the temporary grounding period in both groups of pilots (senior: 22.3 ± 15.7 vs. 6.3 ± 4.7 mo; non-senior: 24.2 ± 17.2 vs. 7.5 ± 8.6 mo, as mean ± SD, respectively).

Discussion: Medical disqualification in senior pilots is more frequent than with younger pilots and may have a greater impact on crew availability. Looking at ways of increasing the number of older pilots returning to work would benefit crew availability as would a focus on the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Takazoe K, Gomi H. The health status of pilots over age 60 at a Japanese airline. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2025; 96(5):392-398.

日本某航空公司60岁以上飞行员的健康状况。
引言:本研究考察了60岁以上飞行员的健康状况及其对劳动力的影响,重点关注那些没有重返工作岗位的飞行员。方法:在2008年至2013年期间,对日本一家主要航空公司年龄达到60岁的飞行员进行了随后5年的研究(“高级飞行员”)。将5年内不合格的疾病、航空医学审查委员会(AMRB)的申请、处置和停飞时间与同一时期55岁的飞行员队列(“非高级飞行员”)的情况进行比较。结果:共有高级飞行员263名,非高级飞行员202名。在AMRB病例中,心血管疾病在高级飞行员中比非高级飞行员更常见(分别为10.3%和4.0%)。高级飞行员申请AMRB(9.9比3.5%)或重返工作岗位的可能性更小,即被拒绝和未申请AMRB的人数的总和(12.2比5.0%),心血管疾病的发病率也更高(4.6比1.0%)。5年研究期内未重返工作岗位的停飞时间明显高于两组飞行员的临时停飞时间(高级:22.3±15.7 vs. 6.3±4.7个月;非老年:分别为24.2±17.2和7.5±8.6个月,平均值±SD)。讨论:与年轻飞行员相比,高级飞行员因健康原因被取消资格的情况更常见,这可能对机组人员的可用性产生更大的影响。研究增加老年飞行员重返工作岗位的方法,将有利于机组人员的可用性,同时也有利于预防心血管疾病。日本航空公司60岁以上飞行员的健康状况。航空航天Med Hum Perform. 2025;96(5): 392 - 398。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aerospace medicine and human performance
Aerospace medicine and human performance PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
22.20%
发文量
272
期刊介绍: The peer-reviewed monthly journal, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance (AMHP), formerly Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, provides contact with physicians, life scientists, bioengineers, and medical specialists working in both basic medical research and in its clinical applications. It is the most used and cited journal in its field. It is distributed to more than 80 nations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信