Psychological Adaptation in a Mixed Sex and Ability Team During a Ski Expedition to the South Pole.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Peter Harper, Nadja Albertsen, Fiona Koivula, Sheila Greenfield, Neil Thomas
{"title":"Psychological Adaptation in a Mixed Sex and Ability Team During a Ski Expedition to the South Pole.","authors":"Peter Harper, Nadja Albertsen, Fiona Koivula, Sheila Greenfield, Neil Thomas","doi":"10.3357/AMHP.6541.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Expeditions in remote locations are becoming increasingly commonplace. As the composition of teams change, understanding team dynamics is important to inform subsequent expeditions in challenging environments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight individuals (five men, three women; five military, three civilians) completed a ski expedition from the Ronne Ice Shelf to the South Pole over 47 d. A mixed methods observational cohort study was undertaken, involving completing pre-expedition Multidimensional Personality Questionnaires and Portrait Values Questionnaires. During the expedition individuals completed the Isolated and Confined Environments Questionnaire and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale at 7-d intervals. Subsequent semistructured interviews using a topic guide informed by Goffman's \"total institution\" were conducted and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire and Portrait Values Questionnaire responses were similar between participants. The Isolated and Confined Environments Questionnaire results showed significant variation with no clear trend. Statistical significance was seen in social and emotional domains between sex and occupations. Positive and Negative Affect Scale scoring demonstrated higher positive affect (mean ± SD; 38.9 ± 1.5) to negative (13.1 ± 1.3). Subgroup analysis demonstrated significance for negative affect between sexes (one result skewed the data). The interviews highlighted that individuals found the routine and lack of personal space challenging. Interpersonal relationships were a source of support but also friction.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite similar initial questionnaires and experiences during the expedition, subjects used a diverse range of coping strategies. Interpersonal factors remain the most important aspect in ensuring a successful team and pre-expeditionary work should be carried out focusing on this. Harper P, Albertsen N, Koivula F, Greenfield S, Thomas N. Psychological adaptation in a mixed sex and ability team during a ski expedition to the South Pole. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2025; 96(5):399-406.</p>","PeriodicalId":7463,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","volume":"96 5","pages":"399-406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6541.2025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Expeditions in remote locations are becoming increasingly commonplace. As the composition of teams change, understanding team dynamics is important to inform subsequent expeditions in challenging environments.

Methods: Eight individuals (five men, three women; five military, three civilians) completed a ski expedition from the Ronne Ice Shelf to the South Pole over 47 d. A mixed methods observational cohort study was undertaken, involving completing pre-expedition Multidimensional Personality Questionnaires and Portrait Values Questionnaires. During the expedition individuals completed the Isolated and Confined Environments Questionnaire and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale at 7-d intervals. Subsequent semistructured interviews using a topic guide informed by Goffman's "total institution" were conducted and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire and Portrait Values Questionnaire responses were similar between participants. The Isolated and Confined Environments Questionnaire results showed significant variation with no clear trend. Statistical significance was seen in social and emotional domains between sex and occupations. Positive and Negative Affect Scale scoring demonstrated higher positive affect (mean ± SD; 38.9 ± 1.5) to negative (13.1 ± 1.3). Subgroup analysis demonstrated significance for negative affect between sexes (one result skewed the data). The interviews highlighted that individuals found the routine and lack of personal space challenging. Interpersonal relationships were a source of support but also friction.

Discussion: Despite similar initial questionnaires and experiences during the expedition, subjects used a diverse range of coping strategies. Interpersonal factors remain the most important aspect in ensuring a successful team and pre-expeditionary work should be carried out focusing on this. Harper P, Albertsen N, Koivula F, Greenfield S, Thomas N. Psychological adaptation in a mixed sex and ability team during a ski expedition to the South Pole. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2025; 96(5):399-406.

南极滑雪探险中男女混合能力队的心理适应。
简介:在偏远地区探险正变得越来越普遍。随着团队组成的变化,了解团队动态对于在具有挑战性的环境中进行后续探险非常重要。方法:8例(男5例,女3例;五名军人,三名平民)在47天内完成了从罗纳冰架到南极的滑雪探险。进行了一项混合方法观察队列研究,包括完成探险前的多维人格问卷和肖像价值观问卷。在考察期间,受试者每隔7天完成一次孤立与受限环境问卷和积极与消极情绪量表。随后的半结构化访谈采用戈夫曼的“总制度”主题指南进行,并使用反身性主题分析进行分析。结果:多维人格问卷和肖像价值观问卷的回答在被试之间具有相似性。隔离和密闭环境问卷调查结果有显著差异,但没有明显的趋势。在社会和情感领域,性别和职业之间存在统计学意义。积极情绪量表和消极情绪量表评分显示积极情绪较高(均数±标准差;38.9±1.5)至负(13.1±1.3)。亚组分析显示性别之间的负面影响具有显著性(一个结果使数据偏斜)。采访强调,人们发现这种常规和缺乏个人空间具有挑战性。人际关系是支持的来源,但也是摩擦的来源。讨论:尽管最初的调查问卷和探险期间的经历相似,但受试者使用了不同的应对策略。人际因素仍然是确保团队成功的最重要方面,远征前的工作应集中于此。Harper P, Albertsen N, Koivula F, Greenfield S, Thomas N.南极滑雪探险中男女混合能力团队的心理适应。航空航天Med Hum Perform. 2025;96(5): 399 - 406。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aerospace medicine and human performance
Aerospace medicine and human performance PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
22.20%
发文量
272
期刊介绍: The peer-reviewed monthly journal, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance (AMHP), formerly Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, provides contact with physicians, life scientists, bioengineers, and medical specialists working in both basic medical research and in its clinical applications. It is the most used and cited journal in its field. It is distributed to more than 80 nations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信