Understanding encroachment typologies through remote sensing and socio-economic analysis: enhancing national park management in Kerinci Seblat National Park, Indonesia.

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Muhammad Habib, Dedy Fitriawan, Kazuhiro Harada
{"title":"Understanding encroachment typologies through remote sensing and socio-economic analysis: enhancing national park management in Kerinci Seblat National Park, Indonesia.","authors":"Muhammad Habib, Dedy Fitriawan, Kazuhiro Harada","doi":"10.1007/s00267-025-02218-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Encroachment remains a persistent challenge for Kerinci Seblat National Park (KSNP), despite its designation as a protected area. While agricultural use by local communities continues, limited understanding of the actors and their motivations hampers effective policy responses. This study addresses this gap by integrating remote sensing with socio-economic analysis to examine encroacher typologies and their spatial dynamics. Land use and land cover (LULC) changes were detected using Landsat 5, 7, and 8 imagery across six time periods (1988-2022), analyzed through maximum likelihood classification. Field surveys were conducted with 206 households, alongside in-depth interviews with customary leaders, village heads, and KSNP. We found an increasing trend of encroachment since the initial identification of the KSNP to the present, which correlates with the expansion of agricultural land. We grouped the typologies of encroachers into indigenous landless (23%), indigenous people with economic opportunities (29%), sly opportunists (2%), indigenous people as investors (3%), workers/profit-sharing partners (42%), and local migrants (1%). The dominant typology was workers/profit-sharing partners, which indicates that this partnership has a broad influence and wide coverage. Grouping actors supports the implementation of programs according to their motives and characteristics. The solution to encroachment should include a livelihood improvement program for indigenous people without land ownership, the establishment of utilization (e.g., agroforestry areas) and buffer zones, and enhanced law enforcement for other typologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02218-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Encroachment remains a persistent challenge for Kerinci Seblat National Park (KSNP), despite its designation as a protected area. While agricultural use by local communities continues, limited understanding of the actors and their motivations hampers effective policy responses. This study addresses this gap by integrating remote sensing with socio-economic analysis to examine encroacher typologies and their spatial dynamics. Land use and land cover (LULC) changes were detected using Landsat 5, 7, and 8 imagery across six time periods (1988-2022), analyzed through maximum likelihood classification. Field surveys were conducted with 206 households, alongside in-depth interviews with customary leaders, village heads, and KSNP. We found an increasing trend of encroachment since the initial identification of the KSNP to the present, which correlates with the expansion of agricultural land. We grouped the typologies of encroachers into indigenous landless (23%), indigenous people with economic opportunities (29%), sly opportunists (2%), indigenous people as investors (3%), workers/profit-sharing partners (42%), and local migrants (1%). The dominant typology was workers/profit-sharing partners, which indicates that this partnership has a broad influence and wide coverage. Grouping actors supports the implementation of programs according to their motives and characteristics. The solution to encroachment should include a livelihood improvement program for indigenous people without land ownership, the establishment of utilization (e.g., agroforestry areas) and buffer zones, and enhanced law enforcement for other typologies.

通过遥感和社会经济分析了解入侵类型:加强印尼Kerinci Seblat国家公园的管理。
尽管被指定为保护区,但对Kerinci Seblat国家公园(KSNP)来说,入侵仍然是一个持续的挑战。虽然当地社区的农业使用仍在继续,但对行为者及其动机的了解有限,妨碍了有效的政策反应。本研究通过将遥感与社会经济分析相结合来研究入侵者类型及其空间动态,从而解决了这一差距。利用Landsat 5、7和8影像检测了6个时间段(1988-2022)的土地利用和土地覆盖(LULC)变化,并通过最大似然分类进行了分析。对206个家庭进行了实地调查,并对习惯领导人、村长和KSNP进行了深入访谈。研究发现,自发现KSNP以来,土地被侵占的趋势呈增加趋势,这与农业用地的扩张有关。我们将入侵者的类型分为无地土著人(23%)、有经济机会的土著人(29%)、狡猾的机会主义者(2%)、作为投资者的土著人(3%)、工人/利润分享伙伴(42%)和当地移民(1%)。主要的类型是工人/利润分享伙伴,这表明这种伙伴关系具有广泛的影响和广泛的覆盖范围。对参与者进行分组,可以根据他们的动机和特点来支持项目的实施。解决侵占问题的办法应包括为没有土地所有权的土著人民制定改善生计的方案,建立利用(如农林业区)和缓冲区,并加强对其他类型土地的执法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Management
Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more. As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信