Understanding encroachment typologies through remote sensing and socio-economic analysis: enhancing national park management in Kerinci Seblat National Park, Indonesia.
{"title":"Understanding encroachment typologies through remote sensing and socio-economic analysis: enhancing national park management in Kerinci Seblat National Park, Indonesia.","authors":"Muhammad Habib, Dedy Fitriawan, Kazuhiro Harada","doi":"10.1007/s00267-025-02218-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Encroachment remains a persistent challenge for Kerinci Seblat National Park (KSNP), despite its designation as a protected area. While agricultural use by local communities continues, limited understanding of the actors and their motivations hampers effective policy responses. This study addresses this gap by integrating remote sensing with socio-economic analysis to examine encroacher typologies and their spatial dynamics. Land use and land cover (LULC) changes were detected using Landsat 5, 7, and 8 imagery across six time periods (1988-2022), analyzed through maximum likelihood classification. Field surveys were conducted with 206 households, alongside in-depth interviews with customary leaders, village heads, and KSNP. We found an increasing trend of encroachment since the initial identification of the KSNP to the present, which correlates with the expansion of agricultural land. We grouped the typologies of encroachers into indigenous landless (23%), indigenous people with economic opportunities (29%), sly opportunists (2%), indigenous people as investors (3%), workers/profit-sharing partners (42%), and local migrants (1%). The dominant typology was workers/profit-sharing partners, which indicates that this partnership has a broad influence and wide coverage. Grouping actors supports the implementation of programs according to their motives and characteristics. The solution to encroachment should include a livelihood improvement program for indigenous people without land ownership, the establishment of utilization (e.g., agroforestry areas) and buffer zones, and enhanced law enforcement for other typologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02218-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Encroachment remains a persistent challenge for Kerinci Seblat National Park (KSNP), despite its designation as a protected area. While agricultural use by local communities continues, limited understanding of the actors and their motivations hampers effective policy responses. This study addresses this gap by integrating remote sensing with socio-economic analysis to examine encroacher typologies and their spatial dynamics. Land use and land cover (LULC) changes were detected using Landsat 5, 7, and 8 imagery across six time periods (1988-2022), analyzed through maximum likelihood classification. Field surveys were conducted with 206 households, alongside in-depth interviews with customary leaders, village heads, and KSNP. We found an increasing trend of encroachment since the initial identification of the KSNP to the present, which correlates with the expansion of agricultural land. We grouped the typologies of encroachers into indigenous landless (23%), indigenous people with economic opportunities (29%), sly opportunists (2%), indigenous people as investors (3%), workers/profit-sharing partners (42%), and local migrants (1%). The dominant typology was workers/profit-sharing partners, which indicates that this partnership has a broad influence and wide coverage. Grouping actors supports the implementation of programs according to their motives and characteristics. The solution to encroachment should include a livelihood improvement program for indigenous people without land ownership, the establishment of utilization (e.g., agroforestry areas) and buffer zones, and enhanced law enforcement for other typologies.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more.
As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.