Climate Consideration in Environmental Effects Analyses on Federal Public Lands in the United States.

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Sarah E Whipple, Sarah K Carter, Tait K Rutherford, Samuel E Jordan, Richard J Lehrter, Christopher T Domschke, Megan A Gilbert, Julian Reyes, Ella M Samuel, Karen M Schank, John C Tull, David J A Wood
{"title":"Climate Consideration in Environmental Effects Analyses on Federal Public Lands in the United States.","authors":"Sarah E Whipple, Sarah K Carter, Tait K Rutherford, Samuel E Jordan, Richard J Lehrter, Christopher T Domschke, Megan A Gilbert, Julian Reyes, Ella M Samuel, Karen M Schank, John C Tull, David J A Wood","doi":"10.1007/s00267-025-02189-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effects of a changing climate, including drought, wildfire, and invasive species encroachment, are evident on public lands across the United States. Decision making on Federal public lands requires analyses under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and there are guidelines for considering climate in NEPA analyses. To better understand how climate most recently has been considered, we analyzed a stratified random sample of 130 environmental assessments (EAs) completed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) from 2021 to 2023 across the contiguous United States. We assessed whether EAs considered (1) potential effects of the proposed action on climate (2) potential climate effects on the proposed action, and (3) potential climate effects on resources of concern. We also identified whether EAs included data and science about climate or greenhouse gas emissions, and which datasets and documents were cited. We used two approaches: automated keyword searches and document analysis. Thirty-seven percent of EAs considered the potential effects of the proposed action on climate, 8% considered the potential effects of climate on the proposed action, and 4% of individual resource analyses considered the potential effects of climate on the resource. EAs in the 'oil and gas development,' 'renewable energy,' and 'forestry and timber management' proposed action categories most frequently considered the potential effects of climate and used climate data and science. Our findings suggest an opportunity for scientists to work more closely with public land managers to identify available data and science for considering climate in environmental effects analyses and to provide science delivery mechanisms that can facilitate the consideration and use of climate science in decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02189-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effects of a changing climate, including drought, wildfire, and invasive species encroachment, are evident on public lands across the United States. Decision making on Federal public lands requires analyses under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and there are guidelines for considering climate in NEPA analyses. To better understand how climate most recently has been considered, we analyzed a stratified random sample of 130 environmental assessments (EAs) completed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) from 2021 to 2023 across the contiguous United States. We assessed whether EAs considered (1) potential effects of the proposed action on climate (2) potential climate effects on the proposed action, and (3) potential climate effects on resources of concern. We also identified whether EAs included data and science about climate or greenhouse gas emissions, and which datasets and documents were cited. We used two approaches: automated keyword searches and document analysis. Thirty-seven percent of EAs considered the potential effects of the proposed action on climate, 8% considered the potential effects of climate on the proposed action, and 4% of individual resource analyses considered the potential effects of climate on the resource. EAs in the 'oil and gas development,' 'renewable energy,' and 'forestry and timber management' proposed action categories most frequently considered the potential effects of climate and used climate data and science. Our findings suggest an opportunity for scientists to work more closely with public land managers to identify available data and science for considering climate in environmental effects analyses and to provide science delivery mechanisms that can facilitate the consideration and use of climate science in decision making.

美国联邦公共土地环境影响分析中的气候因素。
气候变化的影响,包括干旱、野火和入侵物种的入侵,在美国各地的公共土地上都很明显。联邦公共土地的决策需要根据《国家环境政策法》(NEPA)进行分析,并且在NEPA分析中有考虑气候的指导方针。为了更好地理解最近气候是如何被考虑的,我们分析了美国土地管理局(BLM)在2021年至2023年期间完成的130项环境评估(ea)的分层随机样本。我们评估了ea是否考虑了(1)拟议行动对气候的潜在影响(2)拟议行动对气候的潜在影响,以及(3)对有关资源的潜在气候影响。我们还确定了ea是否包括有关气候或温室气体排放的数据和科学,以及引用了哪些数据集和文件。我们使用了两种方法:自动关键字搜索和文档分析。37%的ea考虑了拟议行动对气候的潜在影响,8%考虑了气候对拟议行动的潜在影响,4%的个别资源分析考虑了气候对资源的潜在影响。“石油和天然气开发”、“可再生能源”和“林业和木材管理”中的ea提议的行动类别最常考虑气候的潜在影响,并使用气候数据和科学。我们的发现为科学家提供了一个与公共土地管理者更密切合作的机会,以确定在环境影响分析中考虑气候的可用数据和科学,并提供科学交付机制,促进在决策中考虑和使用气候科学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Management
Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more. As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信