Rapid Detection of Pseudomonas in Spoiled Meats by Lateral Flow Immunochromatographic Assay

IF 1.8 4区 农林科学 Q4 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Tatsuya Tominaga, Kyoka Aiki, Aiho Kushida, Rin Tsuchiya
{"title":"Rapid Detection of Pseudomonas in Spoiled Meats by Lateral Flow Immunochromatographic Assay","authors":"Tatsuya Tominaga,&nbsp;Kyoka Aiki,&nbsp;Aiho Kushida,&nbsp;Rin Tsuchiya","doi":"10.1111/jfs.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Bacteria propagate during storage of raw meat, leading to spoilage. We developed a lateral flow immunochromatographic assay (LFIA) to rapidly assess the freshness/spoilage of raw meats. Amplicon analysis was performed on raw meats immediately after purchase and after being stored aerobically at 4°C for 10 days. The proportion of <i>Pseudomonas</i> increased 2.2–15.5 times as spoilage progressed. We prepared antibodies against putative <i>Pseudomonas lundensis</i>, <i>Pseudomonas fragi</i>, <i>Pseudomonas bubulae</i>/<i>Pseudomonas kulmbachensi</i> mixture, and putative <i>P. lundensis</i>, <i>Pseudomonas edaphica</i>, <i>Pseudomonas canadensis</i> mixture isolated from spoiled meats, and developed LFIAs (Plfbk-LFIA and Plec-LFIA, respectively). When the specificities were investigated using 70 strains representing 61 species from 32 genera, as selected from culture collection strains and meat isolates, Plfbk-LFIA showed strong positivity only for <i>P. fragi</i>, and Plec-LFIA showed strong positivity only for <i>Pseudomonas</i> sp. isolated from meats. We purchased 36 types of commercially available meat (minced chicken, minced pork, ground beef, and chopped pork) from different stores and found that both LFIAs could distinguish between fresh and spoiled meats, exhibiting accuracies of 91.7% and 94.4%, respectively. Plfbk-LFIA and Plec-LFIA tended to become positive when the target bacterium counts in the samples were around 6 and 7 log CFU/g, respectively. As the assay requires only 1 h, including pre-processing time, our novel method could be used to evaluate freshness at manufacturing and sales sites within the manufacturing date, and may contribute to reducing food loss by providing a rapid and convenient method for quality assessment.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Safety","volume":"45 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfs.70027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bacteria propagate during storage of raw meat, leading to spoilage. We developed a lateral flow immunochromatographic assay (LFIA) to rapidly assess the freshness/spoilage of raw meats. Amplicon analysis was performed on raw meats immediately after purchase and after being stored aerobically at 4°C for 10 days. The proportion of Pseudomonas increased 2.2–15.5 times as spoilage progressed. We prepared antibodies against putative Pseudomonas lundensis, Pseudomonas fragi, Pseudomonas bubulae/Pseudomonas kulmbachensi mixture, and putative P. lundensis, Pseudomonas edaphica, Pseudomonas canadensis mixture isolated from spoiled meats, and developed LFIAs (Plfbk-LFIA and Plec-LFIA, respectively). When the specificities were investigated using 70 strains representing 61 species from 32 genera, as selected from culture collection strains and meat isolates, Plfbk-LFIA showed strong positivity only for P. fragi, and Plec-LFIA showed strong positivity only for Pseudomonas sp. isolated from meats. We purchased 36 types of commercially available meat (minced chicken, minced pork, ground beef, and chopped pork) from different stores and found that both LFIAs could distinguish between fresh and spoiled meats, exhibiting accuracies of 91.7% and 94.4%, respectively. Plfbk-LFIA and Plec-LFIA tended to become positive when the target bacterium counts in the samples were around 6 and 7 log CFU/g, respectively. As the assay requires only 1 h, including pre-processing time, our novel method could be used to evaluate freshness at manufacturing and sales sites within the manufacturing date, and may contribute to reducing food loss by providing a rapid and convenient method for quality assessment.

横向流动免疫层析法快速检测变质肉类中的假单胞菌
细菌在生肉储存过程中繁殖,导致肉变质。我们开发了一种横向流动免疫层析法(LFIA)来快速评估生肉的新鲜度/腐败程度。生肉在购买后和在4°C有氧保存10天后立即进行扩增子分析。随着腐坏的进行,假单胞菌的比例增加了2.2 ~ 15.5倍。我们制备了从腐肉中分离出的伦德假单胞菌、fragi假单胞菌、bubulae假单胞菌/ kulmbachensi假单胞菌混合物和伦德假单胞菌、edaphica假单胞菌、加拿大假单胞菌混合物的抗体,并开发了lfia (Plfbk-LFIA和Plec-LFIA)。结果表明,Plfbk-LFIA仅对fragi假单胞菌呈强阳性,Plec-LFIA仅对肉源假单胞菌呈强阳性。我们从不同的商店购买了36种市售肉类(鸡肉糜、猪肉糜、碎牛肉和碎猪肉),发现两种LFIAs都可以区分新鲜和变质的肉类,准确率分别为91.7%和94.4%。Plfbk-LFIA和Plec-LFIA在目标菌数分别为6和7 log CFU/g左右时趋于阳性。由于该方法只需要1小时(包括预处理时间),因此该方法可用于生产日期内生产和销售现场的新鲜度评估,并通过提供快速方便的质量评估方法,有助于减少食品损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Safety
Journal of Food Safety 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Safety emphasizes mechanistic studies involving inhibition, injury, and metabolism of food poisoning microorganisms, as well as the regulation of growth and toxin production in both model systems and complex food substrates. It also focuses on pathogens which cause food-borne illness, helping readers understand the factors affecting the initial detection of parasites, their development, transmission, and methods of control and destruction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信