An integrated population model of a high-density coyote population in South Carolina, USA

IF 2.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2025-07-12 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70339
Heather E. Gaya, Gino J. D'Angelo, Jordan L. Youngmann, Stacey L. Lance, John C. Kilgo
{"title":"An integrated population model of a high-density coyote population in South Carolina, USA","authors":"Heather E. Gaya,&nbsp;Gino J. D'Angelo,&nbsp;Jordan L. Youngmann,&nbsp;Stacey L. Lance,&nbsp;John C. Kilgo","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the absence of red wolves (<i>Canis rufus</i>), coyote (<i>Canis latrans</i>) populations have expanded across the eastern United States. However, predator populations are particularly difficult to quantify, and it remains unclear if and when eastern coyotes will reach carrying capacity. To assess coyote population trends, we constructed an integrated population model (IPM) using coyote data recorded at the United States Department of Energy's Savannah River Site (SRS), a 78,000-ha National Environmental Research Park located in South Carolina, United States. Coyote densities averaged 50 coyotes/100 km<sup>2</sup> prior to lethal control in 2010 but dropped to 14 coyotes/100 km<sup>2</sup> in 2012 after three consecutive years of intensive lethal removal. By 2014, coyote densities stabilized around 44 coyotes/100 km<sup>2</sup>. These results suggest that coyote populations can decline under sustained intensive control efforts but may rapidly increase when control efforts are ceased. Our results highlight the power of IPMs to estimate population parameters across long time scales when data collection is both spatially and temporally heterogenous. Lethal control efforts for coyotes are prohibitively expensive at a large scale and are unlikely to be a viable long-term management strategy. Managers should instead focus on setting game species hunting limits that account for coyote presence on the landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70339","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70339","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the absence of red wolves (Canis rufus), coyote (Canis latrans) populations have expanded across the eastern United States. However, predator populations are particularly difficult to quantify, and it remains unclear if and when eastern coyotes will reach carrying capacity. To assess coyote population trends, we constructed an integrated population model (IPM) using coyote data recorded at the United States Department of Energy's Savannah River Site (SRS), a 78,000-ha National Environmental Research Park located in South Carolina, United States. Coyote densities averaged 50 coyotes/100 km2 prior to lethal control in 2010 but dropped to 14 coyotes/100 km2 in 2012 after three consecutive years of intensive lethal removal. By 2014, coyote densities stabilized around 44 coyotes/100 km2. These results suggest that coyote populations can decline under sustained intensive control efforts but may rapidly increase when control efforts are ceased. Our results highlight the power of IPMs to estimate population parameters across long time scales when data collection is both spatially and temporally heterogenous. Lethal control efforts for coyotes are prohibitively expensive at a large scale and are unlikely to be a viable long-term management strategy. Managers should instead focus on setting game species hunting limits that account for coyote presence on the landscape.

Abstract Image

美国南卡罗来纳高密度土狼种群的综合种群模型
在没有红狼(Canis rufus)的情况下,土狼(Canis latrans)的种群在美国东部扩张。然而,捕食者的数量尤其难以量化,而且尚不清楚东部土狼是否以及何时会达到承载能力。为了评估土狼的种群趋势,我们利用美国能源部萨凡纳河遗址(SRS)记录的土狼数据构建了一个综合种群模型(IPM)。萨凡纳河遗址位于美国南卡罗来纳州,是一个占地7.8万公顷的国家环境研究公园。在2010年进行致命控制之前,土狼密度平均为50只/100平方公里,但在连续三年密集致命清除后,2012年土狼密度下降到14只/100平方公里。到2014年,土狼密度稳定在每100平方公里44只土狼左右。这些结果表明,在持续强化的控制措施下,土狼种群数量可能会下降,但在控制措施停止后,土狼种群数量可能会迅速增加。我们的研究结果强调了ipm在长时间尺度上估计人口参数的能力,当数据收集在空间和时间上都是异质的。大规模地对土狼进行致命的控制是非常昂贵的,而且不太可能是一个可行的长期管理策略。管理人员应该把重点放在设定狩猎物种的限制上,以解释土狼在景观中的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信