The Biogeochemistry of Natural Climate Solutions Based on Fish, Fisheries, and Marine Mammals: A Review of Current Evidence, Research Needs, and Critical Assessment of Readiness

IF 5.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
James R. Collins, Mattias R. Cape, Robert E. Boenish, Claudia R. Benitez-Nelson, Scott C. Doney, Rod Fujita, Steven D. Gaines, Rebecca L. Gruby, Di Jin, Heather H. Kim, Kristin M. Kleisner, Gaël Mariani, Lisa A. Moore, Andrew J. Pershing, Douglas N. Rader, Joe Roman, Grace K. Saba, James N. Sanchirico, Steven Saul, Matthew S. Savoca, Alexander Waller
{"title":"The Biogeochemistry of Natural Climate Solutions Based on Fish, Fisheries, and Marine Mammals: A Review of Current Evidence, Research Needs, and Critical Assessment of Readiness","authors":"James R. Collins,&nbsp;Mattias R. Cape,&nbsp;Robert E. Boenish,&nbsp;Claudia R. Benitez-Nelson,&nbsp;Scott C. Doney,&nbsp;Rod Fujita,&nbsp;Steven D. Gaines,&nbsp;Rebecca L. Gruby,&nbsp;Di Jin,&nbsp;Heather H. Kim,&nbsp;Kristin M. Kleisner,&nbsp;Gaël Mariani,&nbsp;Lisa A. Moore,&nbsp;Andrew J. Pershing,&nbsp;Douglas N. Rader,&nbsp;Joe Roman,&nbsp;Grace K. Saba,&nbsp;James N. Sanchirico,&nbsp;Steven Saul,&nbsp;Matthew S. Savoca,&nbsp;Alexander Waller","doi":"10.1029/2024GB008393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Several initiatives to conserve, restore or better manage fisheries, fishes, whales, and other marine animals have been proposed as natural climate solutions to sequester carbon from the atmosphere or avoid new emissions. We reviewed the knowledge and uncertainties surrounding carbon fluxes and storage mediated by these organisms to evaluate their suitability to support climate mitigation interventions. Estimates of the carbon stored within fish and marine mammal biomass ranged from 0.1 to 1.9 Pg C for mesopelagic fishes, 0.7–0.6 Pg C for all fishes, 0.0020–0.016 Pg C for great whales, and 0.0065–0.0113 Pg C for all marine mammals, compared to an estimated 1.5–6 Pg C stored in all ocean biota. Mesopelagic fishes, epipelagic fishes and great whales contribute on the order of 1–3 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup>, 0.03–0.06 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup>, and 0.001–0.004 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, to export from the ocean's surface below the euphotic zone, compared to an estimated total marine biological export of 9–10 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup>. The combined flux of carbon to the atmosphere from benthic trawling, biomass extraction, and fuel consumption during commercial fishing ranged from 0.05 to 0.25 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup>. Substantial uncertainties were associated with nearly all fluxes and reservoirs. The contributions of whales to carbon export and the mobilization of sediment carbon during benthic trawling were least certain, limiting the readiness of associated pathways to provide quantifiable, high-quality carbon credits. Although substantial uncertainties also surrounded mesopelagic fishes, we found that even conservative estimates of these organisms' contribution to ocean carbon export are large enough to justify conservation actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12729,"journal":{"name":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","volume":"39 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GB008393","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GB008393","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several initiatives to conserve, restore or better manage fisheries, fishes, whales, and other marine animals have been proposed as natural climate solutions to sequester carbon from the atmosphere or avoid new emissions. We reviewed the knowledge and uncertainties surrounding carbon fluxes and storage mediated by these organisms to evaluate their suitability to support climate mitigation interventions. Estimates of the carbon stored within fish and marine mammal biomass ranged from 0.1 to 1.9 Pg C for mesopelagic fishes, 0.7–0.6 Pg C for all fishes, 0.0020–0.016 Pg C for great whales, and 0.0065–0.0113 Pg C for all marine mammals, compared to an estimated 1.5–6 Pg C stored in all ocean biota. Mesopelagic fishes, epipelagic fishes and great whales contribute on the order of 1–3 Pg C yr−1, 0.03–0.06 Pg C yr−1, and 0.001–0.004 Pg C yr−1, respectively, to export from the ocean's surface below the euphotic zone, compared to an estimated total marine biological export of 9–10 Pg C yr−1. The combined flux of carbon to the atmosphere from benthic trawling, biomass extraction, and fuel consumption during commercial fishing ranged from 0.05 to 0.25 Pg C yr−1. Substantial uncertainties were associated with nearly all fluxes and reservoirs. The contributions of whales to carbon export and the mobilization of sediment carbon during benthic trawling were least certain, limiting the readiness of associated pathways to provide quantifiable, high-quality carbon credits. Although substantial uncertainties also surrounded mesopelagic fishes, we found that even conservative estimates of these organisms' contribution to ocean carbon export are large enough to justify conservation actions.

Abstract Image

基于鱼类、渔业和海洋哺乳动物的自然气候解决方案的生物地球化学:当前证据、研究需求和准备程度的关键评估综述
一些保护、恢复或更好地管理渔业、鱼类、鲸鱼和其他海洋动物的倡议已经被提出,作为自然气候解决方案,从大气中隔离碳或避免新的排放。我们回顾了这些生物介导的碳通量和碳储存的知识和不确定性,以评估它们是否适合支持气候缓解干预措施。鱼类和海洋哺乳动物生物量中碳储量的估计范围为:中远洋鱼类为0.1 - 1.9 Pg C,所有鱼类为0.7-0.6 Pg C,大型鲸鱼为0.0020-0.016 Pg C,所有海洋哺乳动物为0.0065-0.0113 Pg C,而所有海洋生物群中碳储量的估计范围为1.5-6 Pg C。中远洋鱼类、上层鱼类和大型鲸鱼分别贡献了1 - 3 Pg - C /年−1、0.03-0.06 Pg - C /年−1和0.001-0.004 Pg - C /年−1,而海洋生物出口总量估计为9-10 Pg - C /年−1。在商业捕鱼期间,底栖拖网捕捞、生物质提取和燃料消耗向大气排放的碳总量为0.05至0.25 Pg C /年。几乎所有的通量和储层都存在大量的不确定性。在底栖拖网捕捞期间,鲸鱼对碳输出和沉积物碳动员的贡献是最不确定的,这限制了相关途径提供可量化、高质量碳信用额的准备程度。尽管中上层鱼类也存在很大的不确定性,但我们发现,即使对这些生物对海洋碳输出的贡献进行保守估计,也足以证明采取保护行动是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Global Biogeochemical Cycles 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
141
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Biogeochemical Cycles (GBC) features research on regional to global biogeochemical interactions, as well as more local studies that demonstrate fundamental implications for biogeochemical processing at regional or global scales. Published papers draw on a wide array of methods and knowledge and extend in time from the deep geologic past to recent historical and potential future interactions. This broad scope includes studies that elucidate human activities as interactive components of biogeochemical cycles and physical Earth Systems including climate. Authors are required to make their work accessible to a broad interdisciplinary range of scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信