Lasting Impact of Patient-Led Medical Education

IF 1.2 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-07-12 DOI:10.1111/tct.70147
Bonita Sawatzky, Cathy Kline
{"title":"Lasting Impact of Patient-Led Medical Education","authors":"Bonita Sawatzky,&nbsp;Cathy Kline","doi":"10.1111/tct.70147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Our university offers an interprofessional program to medical students in Year 1 of a 4-year undergraduate medical program: Health professional students learn from a health mentor—someone living with a chronic condition. This helps foster patient-centredness, empathy and communication skills. Long-term assessment of patient involvement in medical education is rare; thus, this study explores the lasting effects of 3-year post-program at entry-to-practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a case-based study of fourth-year medical students to evaluate the impact of learning from patients in the Health Mentors Program (HMP). Students analysed a video case of a person with cerebral palsy who fell at home and created a care plan. We compared students who participated in the HMP with those who did not, assessing how often they considered the patient's and caregiver's perspectives, the number of diagnostic tests ordered and referrals to other professionals and community services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p><i>T</i>-tests showed that HMP students significantly prioritised the patient's and caregiver's voices (<i>p</i> = 0.014, Cohen's <i>d</i> = 0.6) and ordered fewer diagnostic tests than non–HMP students (<i>p</i> = 0.001, Cohen's <i>d</i> = 3.3). However, there were no significant differences in medical consults, referrals to allied health professionals or community services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This was the first, limited attempt to use case-based assessments to measure the long-term impact of patient-centred learning. Integrating patient perspectives into preclinical education may enhance students' ability to work collaboratively with patients in care planning. Designing structured assessments around patient-centred care can help ensure that students retain and apply these skills in their clinical careers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.70147","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Our university offers an interprofessional program to medical students in Year 1 of a 4-year undergraduate medical program: Health professional students learn from a health mentor—someone living with a chronic condition. This helps foster patient-centredness, empathy and communication skills. Long-term assessment of patient involvement in medical education is rare; thus, this study explores the lasting effects of 3-year post-program at entry-to-practice.

Methods

We conducted a case-based study of fourth-year medical students to evaluate the impact of learning from patients in the Health Mentors Program (HMP). Students analysed a video case of a person with cerebral palsy who fell at home and created a care plan. We compared students who participated in the HMP with those who did not, assessing how often they considered the patient's and caregiver's perspectives, the number of diagnostic tests ordered and referrals to other professionals and community services.

Findings

T-tests showed that HMP students significantly prioritised the patient's and caregiver's voices (p = 0.014, Cohen's d = 0.6) and ordered fewer diagnostic tests than non–HMP students (p = 0.001, Cohen's d = 3.3). However, there were no significant differences in medical consults, referrals to allied health professionals or community services.

Conclusions

This was the first, limited attempt to use case-based assessments to measure the long-term impact of patient-centred learning. Integrating patient perspectives into preclinical education may enhance students' ability to work collaboratively with patients in care planning. Designing structured assessments around patient-centred care can help ensure that students retain and apply these skills in their clinical careers.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

以病人为主导的医学教育的持久影响
我校为四年制本科医学课程一年级的医学生提供了一个跨专业课程:健康专业的学生向一位患有慢性疾病的健康导师学习。这有助于培养以病人为中心、同理心和沟通技巧。对患者参与医学教育的长期评估是罕见的;因此,本研究探讨了3年项目后在进入实践阶段的持续影响。方法对四年级医学生进行个案研究,以评估健康导师计划(HMP)对患者学习的影响。学生们分析了一个脑瘫患者在家摔倒的视频案例,并制定了一个护理计划。我们比较了参加HMP的学生和没有参加HMP的学生,评估他们考虑患者和护理人员观点的频率,订购的诊断测试的数量以及转介给其他专业人员和社区服务的数量。t检验显示,与非HMP学生相比,HMP学生显著优先考虑患者和护理人员的声音(p = 0.014, Cohen’s d = 0.6),并且订购的诊断测试较少(p = 0.001, Cohen’s d = 3.3)。然而,在医疗咨询、转诊到联合卫生专业人员或社区服务方面没有显著差异。这是第一次有限地尝试使用基于案例的评估来衡量以患者为中心的学习的长期影响。将患者的观点整合到临床前教育中可以提高学生在护理计划中与患者合作的能力。围绕以患者为中心的护理设计结构化评估有助于确保学生在临床职业生涯中保留和应用这些技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信