Clinical Characteristics of Gastrointestinal Malignancy and Validation of the IDIOM Model Among Patients With Iron Deficiency Anemia in Thailand

IF 1.7 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
JGH Open Pub Date : 2025-07-11 DOI:10.1002/jgh3.70221
Kanjira Titsisaeng, Noraworn Jirattikanwong, Phichayut Phinyo, Pojsakorn Danpanichkul, Kanokwan Pinyopornpanish, Nithi Thinrungroj, Phuripong Kijdamrongthum, Apinya Leerapun, Taned Chitapanarux, Wasuwit Wanchaitanawong
{"title":"Clinical Characteristics of Gastrointestinal Malignancy and Validation of the IDIOM Model Among Patients With Iron Deficiency Anemia in Thailand","authors":"Kanjira Titsisaeng,&nbsp;Noraworn Jirattikanwong,&nbsp;Phichayut Phinyo,&nbsp;Pojsakorn Danpanichkul,&nbsp;Kanokwan Pinyopornpanish,&nbsp;Nithi Thinrungroj,&nbsp;Phuripong Kijdamrongthum,&nbsp;Apinya Leerapun,&nbsp;Taned Chitapanarux,&nbsp;Wasuwit Wanchaitanawong","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.70221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Gastrointestinal malignancy is a concerning etiology of iron deficiency anemia (IDA). The IDIOM model predicts gastrointestinal malignancy risk in IDA patients using age, sex, hemoglobin, and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) as parameters. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of gastrointestinal malignancy and externally validate the IDIOM model in Thai IDA patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on adult IDA patients who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy at Chiang Mai University Hospital between 2019 and 2023. Clinical characteristics were compared between patients with and without gastrointestinal malignancy. The IDIOM model's performance was assessed with discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness. To improve its performance, the model was updated using recalibration and refitting methods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 474 IDA patients, 101 (21.3%) had gastrointestinal malignancy, predominantly colorectal cancer (<i>n</i> = 80, 16.9%). Patients with gastrointestinal malignancy were more likely to be male (54.5% vs. 41.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.018), older (65.0 vs. 59.1 years, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), symptomatic (78.2% vs. 44.0%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and had higher rates of positive fecal immunochemical tests (80.9% vs. 29.5%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and lower MCV (68.0 vs. 71.8 fl, <i>p</i> = 0.002). External validation of the IDIOM model yielded an AuROC of 62.9% (95% CI, 56.8%–68.9%). The calibration assessment revealed both underestimation and extreme risk predictions. After updating, the AuROC improved to 67.2% (95% CI, 61.1%–73.3%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Distinct clinical features should alert physicians to the possibility of underlying gastrointestinal malignancy in IDA patients. Given the limited performance of the IDIOM model in the Thai population, a region-specific prediction model tailored to local clinical characteristics is needed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"9 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgh3.70221","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.70221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Gastrointestinal malignancy is a concerning etiology of iron deficiency anemia (IDA). The IDIOM model predicts gastrointestinal malignancy risk in IDA patients using age, sex, hemoglobin, and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) as parameters. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of gastrointestinal malignancy and externally validate the IDIOM model in Thai IDA patients.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on adult IDA patients who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy at Chiang Mai University Hospital between 2019 and 2023. Clinical characteristics were compared between patients with and without gastrointestinal malignancy. The IDIOM model's performance was assessed with discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness. To improve its performance, the model was updated using recalibration and refitting methods.

Results

Among 474 IDA patients, 101 (21.3%) had gastrointestinal malignancy, predominantly colorectal cancer (n = 80, 16.9%). Patients with gastrointestinal malignancy were more likely to be male (54.5% vs. 41.3%, p = 0.018), older (65.0 vs. 59.1 years, p < 0.001), symptomatic (78.2% vs. 44.0%, p < 0.001), and had higher rates of positive fecal immunochemical tests (80.9% vs. 29.5%, p < 0.001) and lower MCV (68.0 vs. 71.8 fl, p = 0.002). External validation of the IDIOM model yielded an AuROC of 62.9% (95% CI, 56.8%–68.9%). The calibration assessment revealed both underestimation and extreme risk predictions. After updating, the AuROC improved to 67.2% (95% CI, 61.1%–73.3%).

Conclusion

Distinct clinical features should alert physicians to the possibility of underlying gastrointestinal malignancy in IDA patients. Given the limited performance of the IDIOM model in the Thai population, a region-specific prediction model tailored to local clinical characteristics is needed.

Abstract Image

泰国缺铁性贫血患者胃肠道恶性肿瘤的临床特征及习语模型的验证
背景胃肠道恶性肿瘤是缺铁性贫血(IDA)的重要病因。习语模型以年龄、性别、血红蛋白和平均红细胞体积(MCV)为参数预测IDA患者的胃肠道恶性肿瘤风险。本研究旨在评估胃肠道恶性肿瘤的临床特征,并从外部验证习语模型在泰国IDA患者中的应用。方法对2019年至2023年在清迈大学医院接受胃肠内镜检查的成人IDA患者进行回顾性横断面研究。比较有和无胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者的临床特征。通过区分、校准和临床有用性评估习语模型的性能。为了提高模型的性能,对模型进行了重新标定和修正。结果474例IDA患者中,101例(21.3%)有胃肠道恶性肿瘤,以结直肠癌为主(n = 80, 16.9%)。胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者多为男性(54.5% vs. 41.3%, p = 0.018)、年龄较大(65.0 vs. 59.1岁,p < 0.001)、有症状(78.2% vs. 44.0%, p < 0.001)、粪便免疫化学试验阳性率较高(80.9% vs. 29.5%, p < 0.001)、MCV较低(68.0 vs. 71.8 fl, p = 0.002)。习语模型的外部验证的AuROC为62.9% (95% CI, 56.8%-68.9%)。校准评估显示了低估和极端风险预测。更新后,AuROC提高到67.2% (95% CI, 61.1%-73.3%)。结论不同的临床特征应提醒医生注意IDA患者潜在的胃肠道恶性肿瘤的可能性。鉴于习语模型在泰国人群中的表现有限,需要一种适合当地临床特征的区域特定预测模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JGH Open
JGH Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信