Communication-Computation Trade-Off and Optimal Control Selection in LQG Control

IF 2 Q2 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Xiyu Gu;Luca Schenato;Subhrakanti Dey;Matthias Pezzutto
{"title":"Communication-Computation Trade-Off and Optimal Control Selection in LQG Control","authors":"Xiyu Gu;Luca Schenato;Subhrakanti Dey;Matthias Pezzutto","doi":"10.1109/LCSYS.2025.3584086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In wireless networked control systems, a common challenge arises in deciding between a remote controller, with higher computational power but delayed information due to wireless communication, and a local onboard controller, with limited computing resources but timely feedback. This letter investigates such a trade-off in the context of the Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) control, focusing on the interplay between computational power and communication delay. We compare two typical controllers: a local controller operating at a coarse control rate and a remote controller utilizing a finer control rate but experiencing network delay. A formal analytical framework is proposed to quantify the impact of network delay on the LQG cost and computation resources. We show that there exists a critical communication delay above which the more powerful remote controller is no more convenient with respect to the simpler local controller, providing a guideline for controller selection in varying network conditions with fixed computing resource configurations. Our approach provides a lightweight, interpretable selection rule based on the communication-computation trade-off. Simulation results validate the effectiveness of our theoretical insights.","PeriodicalId":37235,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Control Systems Letters","volume":"9 ","pages":"1303-1308"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Control Systems Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11058980/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In wireless networked control systems, a common challenge arises in deciding between a remote controller, with higher computational power but delayed information due to wireless communication, and a local onboard controller, with limited computing resources but timely feedback. This letter investigates such a trade-off in the context of the Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) control, focusing on the interplay between computational power and communication delay. We compare two typical controllers: a local controller operating at a coarse control rate and a remote controller utilizing a finer control rate but experiencing network delay. A formal analytical framework is proposed to quantify the impact of network delay on the LQG cost and computation resources. We show that there exists a critical communication delay above which the more powerful remote controller is no more convenient with respect to the simpler local controller, providing a guideline for controller selection in varying network conditions with fixed computing resource configurations. Our approach provides a lightweight, interpretable selection rule based on the communication-computation trade-off. Simulation results validate the effectiveness of our theoretical insights.
LQG控制中的通信-计算权衡与最优控制选择
在无线网络控制系统中,一个常见的挑战是在具有较高计算能力但由于无线通信而延迟信息的远程控制器和具有有限计算资源但及时反馈的本地板载控制器之间做出选择。这封信在线性二次高斯(LQG)控制的背景下研究了这种权衡,重点是计算能力和通信延迟之间的相互作用。我们比较了两种典型的控制器:以粗控制速率运行的本地控制器和使用精细控制速率但经历网络延迟的远程控制器。提出了一个形式化的分析框架来量化网络延迟对LQG成本和计算资源的影响。我们表明存在一个临界通信延迟,在此延迟之上,功能更强大的远程控制器并不比更简单的本地控制器更方便,这为在具有固定计算资源配置的不同网络条件下选择控制器提供了指导。我们的方法提供了一种轻量级的、可解释的选择规则,该规则基于通信与计算的权衡。仿真结果验证了我们理论见解的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Control Systems Letters
IEEE Control Systems Letters Mathematics-Control and Optimization
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
471
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信