Shrinkage of concrete with recycled brick aggregates

IF 8 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Augusto Cezar Maciel Soares , Maria Elizabeth da Nóbrega Tavares
{"title":"Shrinkage of concrete with recycled brick aggregates","authors":"Augusto Cezar Maciel Soares ,&nbsp;Maria Elizabeth da Nóbrega Tavares","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing risk of global warming highlights the need for the construction sector to adopt more sustainable practices. Cement production is one of the main contributors to the industry's carbon footprint, prompting extensive research into optimizing mix designs to reduce cement content and improve binder efficiency. Beyond binder optimization, replacing natural aggregates with recycled materials, such as recycled brick aggregates (RBA), offers an additional strategy to mitigate environmental impact by reducing both waste disposal and natural resource extraction. The use of RBA has gained attention for its potential in sustainable concrete production. While its effects on mechanical properties have been studied, its influence on shrinkage remains less understood. This study investigates the impact of partially and fully replacing natural aggregates with RBA on the mechanical properties and, specifically, on autogenous, drying, and total shrinkage of conventional concrete. The results show that RBA replacement up to 25 % does not significantly affect shrinkage, with values comparable to reference concrete. However, higher replacement levels lead to shrinkage increases of up to 50 %. In terms of mechanical performance, a 25 % substitution results in strength reductions of up to 10 %, while higher dosages can lead to losses of up to 40 %. Thus, the partial replacement of natural aggregates with 25 % RBA in C30 concrete presents a technically and environmentally feasible alternative, contributing to the reduction of the concrete's carbon footprint and its overall global warming potential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"491 ","pages":"Article 142485"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825026364","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing risk of global warming highlights the need for the construction sector to adopt more sustainable practices. Cement production is one of the main contributors to the industry's carbon footprint, prompting extensive research into optimizing mix designs to reduce cement content and improve binder efficiency. Beyond binder optimization, replacing natural aggregates with recycled materials, such as recycled brick aggregates (RBA), offers an additional strategy to mitigate environmental impact by reducing both waste disposal and natural resource extraction. The use of RBA has gained attention for its potential in sustainable concrete production. While its effects on mechanical properties have been studied, its influence on shrinkage remains less understood. This study investigates the impact of partially and fully replacing natural aggregates with RBA on the mechanical properties and, specifically, on autogenous, drying, and total shrinkage of conventional concrete. The results show that RBA replacement up to 25 % does not significantly affect shrinkage, with values comparable to reference concrete. However, higher replacement levels lead to shrinkage increases of up to 50 %. In terms of mechanical performance, a 25 % substitution results in strength reductions of up to 10 %, while higher dosages can lead to losses of up to 40 %. Thus, the partial replacement of natural aggregates with 25 % RBA in C30 concrete presents a technically and environmentally feasible alternative, contributing to the reduction of the concrete's carbon footprint and its overall global warming potential.
再生砖集料混凝土的收缩
全球变暖的风险越来越大,这凸显了建筑行业采取更可持续做法的必要性。水泥生产是行业碳足迹的主要贡献者之一,这促使人们对优化混合设计进行了广泛的研究,以减少水泥含量,提高粘合剂效率。除了粘合剂优化之外,用再生材料替代天然骨料,如再生砖骨料(RBA),通过减少废物处理和自然资源开采,为减轻环境影响提供了额外的策略。RBA的使用因其在可持续混凝土生产中的潜力而受到关注。虽然它对力学性能的影响已经被研究过,但它对收缩的影响仍然知之甚少。本研究探讨了用RBA部分和完全替代天然骨料对机械性能的影响,特别是对传统混凝土的自凝、干燥和总收缩的影响。结果表明,当RBA替换量达到25% %时,对收缩影响不显著,其数值与参考混凝土相当。然而,更高的更换水平导致收缩增加高达50% %。在力学性能方面,25 %的替代导致强度降低高达10 %,而更高的剂量可能导致高达40 %的损失。因此,用25 % RBA部分替代C30混凝土中的天然骨料是一种技术上和环境上可行的替代方案,有助于减少混凝土的碳足迹和其整体的全球变暖潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信