Post-stroke depression risk prediction models in stroke patients: A systematic review

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Xiang Zeng, Xiao Juan Chen
{"title":"Post-stroke depression risk prediction models in stroke patients: A systematic review","authors":"Xiang Zeng,&nbsp;Xiao Juan Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Post-stroke depression (PSD) is a severe complication that significantly affects patients' prognosis. It is widely believed that risk prediction models can be employed to identify patients early and develop intervention measures. Although the number of PSD prediction models has gradually increased, the quality and applicability of these models remain unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aims to systematically review the published research on risk prediction models for PSD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A computer search was conducted in databases including CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library, collecting studies on PSD risk prediction models. The search time frame spanned from the establishment of these databases to March 1, 2025. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias for the included studies before performing a qualitative systematic review.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 12 studies were included, comprising 13 risk prediction models. The area under the curve (AUC) or C-index of these models ranged from 0.726 to 0.928. The risk of bias assessment indicated that all the included models were at high risk, with three models demonstrating poor applicability. The most commonly included predictors in the models were, in order: Barthel Index, NIHSS score, age, hypertension, and education level.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Overall, the predictive performance of PSD risk prediction models is promising. However, limitations remain that require further optimization, including issues related to data sources, study design, and data processing. Future research should prioritize the external validation of existing prediction models or the development of higher-quality models with enhanced applicability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12517,"journal":{"name":"General hospital psychiatry","volume":"96 ","pages":"Pages 132-139"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General hospital psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834325001392","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Post-stroke depression (PSD) is a severe complication that significantly affects patients' prognosis. It is widely believed that risk prediction models can be employed to identify patients early and develop intervention measures. Although the number of PSD prediction models has gradually increased, the quality and applicability of these models remain unclear.

Objective

This study aims to systematically review the published research on risk prediction models for PSD.

Methods

A computer search was conducted in databases including CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library, collecting studies on PSD risk prediction models. The search time frame spanned from the establishment of these databases to March 1, 2025. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias for the included studies before performing a qualitative systematic review.

Results

A total of 12 studies were included, comprising 13 risk prediction models. The area under the curve (AUC) or C-index of these models ranged from 0.726 to 0.928. The risk of bias assessment indicated that all the included models were at high risk, with three models demonstrating poor applicability. The most commonly included predictors in the models were, in order: Barthel Index, NIHSS score, age, hypertension, and education level.

Conclusion

Overall, the predictive performance of PSD risk prediction models is promising. However, limitations remain that require further optimization, including issues related to data sources, study design, and data processing. Future research should prioritize the external validation of existing prediction models or the development of higher-quality models with enhanced applicability.
卒中患者卒中后抑郁风险预测模型:系统综述
脑卒中后抑郁(PSD)是严重影响患者预后的并发症。人们普遍认为,利用风险预测模型可以早期识别患者并制定干预措施。虽然PSD预测模型的数量逐渐增加,但这些模型的质量和适用性仍然不清楚。目的对已发表的PSD风险预测模型进行系统综述。方法计算机检索CNKI、万方数据、VIP、CBM、PubMed、EMbase、Web of Science、CINAHL、Cochrane Library等数据库,收集有关PSD风险预测模型的研究。搜索时间范围从这些数据库建立到2025年3月1日。在进行定性系统评价之前,两名研究人员独立筛选文献、提取数据并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。结果共纳入12项研究,包括13种风险预测模型。这些模型的曲线下面积(AUC)或c指数在0.726 ~ 0.928之间。偏倚风险评估结果显示,纳入的模型均为高风险模型,其中3个模型适用性较差。模型中最常见的预测因子依次为:Barthel指数、NIHSS评分、年龄、高血压和受教育程度。结论总体而言,PSD风险预测模型的预测效果良好。然而,局限性仍然存在,需要进一步优化,包括与数据源、研究设计和数据处理相关的问题。未来的研究应优先考虑对现有预测模型进行外部验证,或开发更高质量、更强适用性的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
General hospital psychiatry
General hospital psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
125
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: General Hospital Psychiatry explores the many linkages among psychiatry, medicine, and primary care. In emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health, the journal provides a forum for professionals with clinical, academic, and research interests in psychiatry''s role in the mainstream of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信