Regulation of propionate degradation in anaerobic reactors: Roles of sludge retention time and organic carbon composition across different operational configurations

IF 6.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Tingxia Liu , Chuanqi Liu , Huanhuan Chang , Guangxue Wu
{"title":"Regulation of propionate degradation in anaerobic reactors: Roles of sludge retention time and organic carbon composition across different operational configurations","authors":"Tingxia Liu ,&nbsp;Chuanqi Liu ,&nbsp;Huanhuan Chang ,&nbsp;Guangxue Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2025.104370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Propionate accumulation is a challenge in anaerobic digestion due to the syntrophic lifestyle, slow growth rate, and environmental sensitivity of syntrophic propionate-oxidizing bacteria. The effects of sludge retention times (SRTs; i.e., 10 and 25 days, and without desludge) and carbon source compositions (a mixture of ethanol/acetate/propionate or sole propionate) on propionate degradation and microbial community structure were examined in sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) and continuous flow reactors (CFRs). SBRs outperformed CFRs in methanogenic propionate degradation, with nearly complete chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal achieved by day 13 (SBR with a mixture of ethanol/acetate/propionate) and day 41 (SBR with sole propionate), compared to day 54 in the CFR with sole propionate. The COD removal efficiency in the CFR with a mixture of ethanol/acetate/propionate stabilized at approximately 70 %. Reactors with a 10-day SRT were unable to efficiently remove propionate across different operational modes and carbon sources. Batch experiments showed that reactors utilizing mixed carbon sources exhibited shorter lag phases, increased acetate degradation activities, and higher maximum methane production rates compared to those using the sole propionate. SBRs enriched <em>Syntrophobacter</em> (16.0 %–22.8 %) and <em>Desulfobulbus</em> (4.1 %–5.0 %), whose relative abundances in CFRs were only 4.1 %–13.5 % and 1.0 %–1.2 %, respectively. Additionally, the relative abundance of genes involved in propionate oxidation increased by 9.7 %–47.0 % in SBRs compared to CFRs. A strategy involving the utilization of long SRTs, SBR operation mode, and mixed carbon sources was proposed to improve system startup and propionate removal in anaerobic reactors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11725,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 104370"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186425003566","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Propionate accumulation is a challenge in anaerobic digestion due to the syntrophic lifestyle, slow growth rate, and environmental sensitivity of syntrophic propionate-oxidizing bacteria. The effects of sludge retention times (SRTs; i.e., 10 and 25 days, and without desludge) and carbon source compositions (a mixture of ethanol/acetate/propionate or sole propionate) on propionate degradation and microbial community structure were examined in sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) and continuous flow reactors (CFRs). SBRs outperformed CFRs in methanogenic propionate degradation, with nearly complete chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal achieved by day 13 (SBR with a mixture of ethanol/acetate/propionate) and day 41 (SBR with sole propionate), compared to day 54 in the CFR with sole propionate. The COD removal efficiency in the CFR with a mixture of ethanol/acetate/propionate stabilized at approximately 70 %. Reactors with a 10-day SRT were unable to efficiently remove propionate across different operational modes and carbon sources. Batch experiments showed that reactors utilizing mixed carbon sources exhibited shorter lag phases, increased acetate degradation activities, and higher maximum methane production rates compared to those using the sole propionate. SBRs enriched Syntrophobacter (16.0 %–22.8 %) and Desulfobulbus (4.1 %–5.0 %), whose relative abundances in CFRs were only 4.1 %–13.5 % and 1.0 %–1.2 %, respectively. Additionally, the relative abundance of genes involved in propionate oxidation increased by 9.7 %–47.0 % in SBRs compared to CFRs. A strategy involving the utilization of long SRTs, SBR operation mode, and mixed carbon sources was proposed to improve system startup and propionate removal in anaerobic reactors.

Abstract Image

厌氧反应器中丙酸降解的调节:污泥滞留时间和有机碳组成在不同操作配置中的作用
由于共生丙酸氧化细菌的共生生活方式、缓慢的生长速度和环境敏感性,丙酸积累在厌氧消化中是一个挑战。污泥滞留时间(SRTs);在序批式反应器(sbr)和连续流反应器(CFRs)中研究了10和25天(无污泥)和碳源组成(乙醇/乙酸/丙酸混合物或单一丙酸)对丙酸降解和微生物群落结构的影响。SBR在产甲烷丙酸降解方面优于CFRs,在第13天(SBR与乙醇/醋酸酯/丙酸混合)和第41天(SBR与丙酸单酯)实现了几乎完全的化学需氧量(COD)去除,而在第54天的CFR中,只有丙酸单酯。乙醇/醋酸酯/丙酸混合物在CFR中的COD去除率稳定在70% %左右。具有10天SRT的反应器在不同的操作模式和碳源下都无法有效地去除丙酸盐。批量实验表明,与单独使用丙酸盐的反应器相比,使用混合碳源的反应器具有更短的滞后期,更高的醋酸酯降解活性和更高的最大甲烷产量。sbr富集了Syntrophobacter(16.0 % ~ 22.8 %)和Desulfobulbus(4.1 % ~ 5.0 %),其在CFRs中的相对丰度分别仅为4.1 % ~ 13.5 %和1.0 % ~ 1.2 %。此外,与CFRs相比,sbr中参与丙酸氧化的基因相对丰度增加了9.7 % -47.0 %。提出了一种利用长srt、SBR操作模式和混合碳源的策略,以提高厌氧反应器的系统启动和丙酸脱除率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Environmental Technology & Innovation Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
435
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Technology & Innovation adopts a challenge-oriented approach to solutions by integrating natural sciences to promote a sustainable future. The journal aims to foster the creation and development of innovative products, technologies, and ideas that enhance the environment, with impacts across soil, air, water, and food in rural and urban areas. As a platform for disseminating scientific evidence for environmental protection and sustainable development, the journal emphasizes fundamental science, methodologies, tools, techniques, and policy considerations. It emphasizes the importance of science and technology in environmental benefits, including smarter, cleaner technologies for environmental protection, more efficient resource processing methods, and the evidence supporting their effectiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信