A multilayer analytical model for reactive contaminant transport through cutoff wall-aquifer systems: Addressing pre-installation contamination and source removal scenarios
{"title":"A multilayer analytical model for reactive contaminant transport through cutoff wall-aquifer systems: Addressing pre-installation contamination and source removal scenarios","authors":"Xiang-Hong Ding , Chun-Hui Peng , Hong-Xin Chen , Lian-Heng Zhao , Yong He","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cutoff walls are a type of engineered barrier widely used to control contaminant transport in the subsurface environment, particularly at legacy contaminated sites. However, most existing models assume initially uncontaminated strata and a persistent source of release, which limits their applicability under realistic site conditions. This study aims to develop a multilayer analytical model that incorporates spatially variable initial contaminant concentrations and accommodates both source-release and source-removal scenarios. The model explicitly couples contaminant advection, dispersion, adsorption, and degradation across a three-domain system (inside aquifer-cutoff wall-outside aquifer), allowing for more accurate performance prediction of vertical barriers. A series of scenario comparisons were conducted using the proposed model, examining the effects of initial pollution status, source dynamics, hydraulic gradients, and barrier permeability. Results show that ignoring pre-existing contamination may lead to an overestimation of breakthrough time by more than 200 %, while source removal can reduce outlet concentrations by up to 50 % depending on wall placement. Sensitivity analysis indicates that reducing barrier permeability (from 10⁻⁸ to 10⁻⁹ m/s) or reversing hydraulic gradients can delay contaminant breakthrough time by an order of magnitude. Practical design curves are introduced to optimize barrier thickness, installation timing, and position, demonstrating that early installation, expanded control zones, and high-adsorption/low-permeability backfilling significantly reduce required barrier dimensions. This work advances predictive tools for cutoff wall performance at legacy contaminated sites, providing actionable insights for engineers to balance remediation costs and environmental safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 107557"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025008249","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cutoff walls are a type of engineered barrier widely used to control contaminant transport in the subsurface environment, particularly at legacy contaminated sites. However, most existing models assume initially uncontaminated strata and a persistent source of release, which limits their applicability under realistic site conditions. This study aims to develop a multilayer analytical model that incorporates spatially variable initial contaminant concentrations and accommodates both source-release and source-removal scenarios. The model explicitly couples contaminant advection, dispersion, adsorption, and degradation across a three-domain system (inside aquifer-cutoff wall-outside aquifer), allowing for more accurate performance prediction of vertical barriers. A series of scenario comparisons were conducted using the proposed model, examining the effects of initial pollution status, source dynamics, hydraulic gradients, and barrier permeability. Results show that ignoring pre-existing contamination may lead to an overestimation of breakthrough time by more than 200 %, while source removal can reduce outlet concentrations by up to 50 % depending on wall placement. Sensitivity analysis indicates that reducing barrier permeability (from 10⁻⁸ to 10⁻⁹ m/s) or reversing hydraulic gradients can delay contaminant breakthrough time by an order of magnitude. Practical design curves are introduced to optimize barrier thickness, installation timing, and position, demonstrating that early installation, expanded control zones, and high-adsorption/low-permeability backfilling significantly reduce required barrier dimensions. This work advances predictive tools for cutoff wall performance at legacy contaminated sites, providing actionable insights for engineers to balance remediation costs and environmental safety.
期刊介绍:
The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice.
PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers.
PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.