MDMA-assisted therapy as a treatment for major depressive disorder: proof of principle study

Tor-Morten Kvam, Ivar W. Goksøyr, Justyna Rog, Inger-Tove Jentoft van de Vooren, Lowan Han Stewart, Ingrid Autran, Mark Berthold-Losleben, Lynn Mørch-Johnsen, René Holst, Ingmar Clausen, Ole A. Andreassen
{"title":"MDMA-assisted therapy as a treatment for major depressive disorder: proof of principle study","authors":"Tor-Morten Kvam, Ivar W. Goksøyr, Justyna Rog, Inger-Tove Jentoft van de Vooren, Lowan Han Stewart, Ingrid Autran, Mark Berthold-Losleben, Lynn Mørch-Johnsen, René Holst, Ingmar Clausen, Ole A. Andreassen","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2025.10320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Background</span><p>3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-assisted therapy (MDMA-AT) has shown promising safety and efficacy in phase 3 studies of post-traumatic stress disorder, but has not been investigated for a primary diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD).</p><span>Aim</span><p>We aimed to explore the proof of principle and safety as a first study with MDMA-AT for MDD, and to provide preliminary efficacy data.</p><span>Method</span><p>Twelve participants (7 women, 5 men) with moderate to severe MDD received MDMA in 2 open-label sessions 1 month apart, along with psychotherapy before, during and after the MDMA sessions, between January 2023 and May 2024. The primary outcome measure was mean change in Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the secondary outcome measure was mean change in functional impairment as measured with the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), both from baseline to 8 weeks following the second MDMA session. We used descriptive statistics and the two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare baseline and outcome scores. Repeated measures were analysed by a mixed-effects model.</p><span>Results</span><p>Baseline MADRS was 29.6 (s.d. 4.9). Feasibility was demonstrated with sufficient recruitment and retention. MADRS scores were significantly reduced post treatment compared with baseline (mean difference –19.3, s.e. 2.4, CI –14.8 to –23.8, <span>P</span> &lt; 0.001). SDS scores significantly decreased from baseline (mean difference –11.7, s.e. 2.2, CI –7.5 to –15.9, <span>P</span> = 0.001). There were no adverse events of special interest, and no unexpected or serious adverse events.</p><span>Conclusion</span><p>The study met the primary objectives of safety and feasibility, and provided indications of efficacy for MDMA-AT for MDD. Further studies with a randomised design are required to confirm these findings.</p><span>Trial registration</span><p>EudraCT no. 2021-000805-26.</p>","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.10320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-assisted therapy (MDMA-AT) has shown promising safety and efficacy in phase 3 studies of post-traumatic stress disorder, but has not been investigated for a primary diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD).

Aim

We aimed to explore the proof of principle and safety as a first study with MDMA-AT for MDD, and to provide preliminary efficacy data.

Method

Twelve participants (7 women, 5 men) with moderate to severe MDD received MDMA in 2 open-label sessions 1 month apart, along with psychotherapy before, during and after the MDMA sessions, between January 2023 and May 2024. The primary outcome measure was mean change in Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the secondary outcome measure was mean change in functional impairment as measured with the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), both from baseline to 8 weeks following the second MDMA session. We used descriptive statistics and the two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare baseline and outcome scores. Repeated measures were analysed by a mixed-effects model.

Results

Baseline MADRS was 29.6 (s.d. 4.9). Feasibility was demonstrated with sufficient recruitment and retention. MADRS scores were significantly reduced post treatment compared with baseline (mean difference –19.3, s.e. 2.4, CI –14.8 to –23.8, P < 0.001). SDS scores significantly decreased from baseline (mean difference –11.7, s.e. 2.2, CI –7.5 to –15.9, P = 0.001). There were no adverse events of special interest, and no unexpected or serious adverse events.

Conclusion

The study met the primary objectives of safety and feasibility, and provided indications of efficacy for MDMA-AT for MDD. Further studies with a randomised design are required to confirm these findings.

Trial registration

EudraCT no. 2021-000805-26.

mdma辅助疗法治疗重度抑郁症:原理研究的证明
背景3,4-亚甲基二氧基甲基苯丙胺(MDMA)辅助疗法(MDMA- at)在创伤后应激障碍的3期研究中显示出良好的安全性和有效性,但尚未对重度抑郁症(MDD)的初步诊断进行调查。AimWe旨在探索MDMA-AT治疗MDD的原理和安全性证明,并提供初步的疗效数据。方法在2023年1月至2024年5月期间,12名中重度重度抑郁症患者(7名女性,5名男性)在两次MDMA开放疗程中接受MDMA治疗,间隔1个月,并在MDMA疗程前、期间和之后接受心理治疗。主要结果测量是Montgomery-Asberg抑郁评定量表(MADRS)的平均变化,次要结果测量是用Sheehan残疾量表(SDS)测量的功能损伤的平均变化,从基线到第二次MDMA治疗后8周。我们使用描述性统计和双尾Wilcoxon sign -rank检验来比较基线和结局评分。采用混合效应模型对重复测量结果进行分析。结果基线MADRS为29.6 (sd . 4.9)。通过充分的招聘和保留证明了可行性。与基线相比,治疗后MADRS评分显著降低(平均差异-19.3,s.e 2.4, CI -14.8 ~ -23.8, P <;0.001)。SDS评分较基线显著下降(平均差为-11.7,标准差为2.2,CI为-7.5至-15.9,P = 0.001)。没有特别关注的不良事件,也没有意外或严重的不良事件。结论本研究达到了安全性和可行性的主要目标,并提供了MDMA-AT治疗重度抑郁症的疗效指征。需要进一步的随机设计研究来证实这些发现。试注册稿号:2021-000805-26。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信