A Reanalysis: SRSS-IE Internalizing Cut Scores to Support Data-Informed Decision-Making in Secondary Schools

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Kathleen Lynne Lane, Katie Scarlett Lane Pelton, Nathan Allen Lane, Wendy Peia Oakes, Mark Matthew Buckman, Kandace Fleming, Rebecca E. Swinburne Romine, Emily D. Cantwell
{"title":"A Reanalysis: SRSS-IE Internalizing Cut Scores to Support Data-Informed Decision-Making in Secondary Schools","authors":"Kathleen Lynne Lane, Katie Scarlett Lane Pelton, Nathan Allen Lane, Wendy Peia Oakes, Mark Matthew Buckman, Kandace Fleming, Rebecca E. Swinburne Romine, Emily D. Cantwell","doi":"10.1177/01987429251349127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We report results from this psychometric study, examining convergent validity between internalizing subscale (SRSS-I4) scores from the revised version of the teacher-completed Student Risk Screening Scale for Internalizing and Externalizing behavior (SRSS-IE 9) and the internalizing subscale from the Teacher Report Form (TRF). Using the sample of nine middle and high schools across two Midwestern states with 227 sixth- through twelfth-grade students, we replicated the data analytic plan used to determine initial cutting scores for use in secondary schools. Results from logistic regression and receiver operator characteristic curves suggested the following preliminary SRSS-I4 risk categories for secondary students: 0 to 2 low, 3 moderate, and 4 to 12 high risk for internalizing behavior patterns relative to the TRF internalizing subscale score. We intended to conduct subsequent analysis to address the nested nature of the data. However, 43.70% of teachers rated only one student on the TRF, resulting in there not being enough observations per classroom estimate a meaningful and accurate random slope in many cases. We discuss limitations and directions for future research, encouraging replication before shifting screening practices in middle and high schools.","PeriodicalId":47249,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Disorders","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01987429251349127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We report results from this psychometric study, examining convergent validity between internalizing subscale (SRSS-I4) scores from the revised version of the teacher-completed Student Risk Screening Scale for Internalizing and Externalizing behavior (SRSS-IE 9) and the internalizing subscale from the Teacher Report Form (TRF). Using the sample of nine middle and high schools across two Midwestern states with 227 sixth- through twelfth-grade students, we replicated the data analytic plan used to determine initial cutting scores for use in secondary schools. Results from logistic regression and receiver operator characteristic curves suggested the following preliminary SRSS-I4 risk categories for secondary students: 0 to 2 low, 3 moderate, and 4 to 12 high risk for internalizing behavior patterns relative to the TRF internalizing subscale score. We intended to conduct subsequent analysis to address the nested nature of the data. However, 43.70% of teachers rated only one student on the TRF, resulting in there not being enough observations per classroom estimate a meaningful and accurate random slope in many cases. We discuss limitations and directions for future research, encouraging replication before shifting screening practices in middle and high schools.
再分析:sss - ie内化分数以支持中学的数据知情决策
我们报告了这项心理测量学研究的结果,检验了教师完成的学生内化和外化行为风险筛查量表(sss - ie9)的修订版内化子量表(sss - i4)分数与教师报告表(TRF)的内化子量表(sss - i4)分数之间的收敛效度。使用横跨中西部两个州的九所初中和高中的样本,227名六年级到十二年级的学生,我们复制了用于确定中学使用的初始切割分数的数据分析计划。logistic回归和接收算子特征曲线的分析结果表明,初中生的SRSS-I4风险等级相对于TRF内化子量表得分分为低风险0 ~ 2个、中风险3个和高风险4 ~ 12个。我们打算进行后续分析,以解决数据的嵌套性质。然而,43.70%的教师在TRF上只给一个学生打分,导致每个教室没有足够的观察结果,在许多情况下,这是一个有意义和准确的随机斜率。我们讨论了未来研究的局限性和方向,鼓励在初中和高中改变筛查做法之前进行复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Behavioral Disorders is sent to all members of the Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders (CCBD), a division of the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC). All CCBD members must first be members of CEC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信