Éva E. Plagányi, Jacob G. D. Rogers, Laura K. Blamey, Amelia A. Desbiens, Marjoleine M. H. Roos, Denham Parker
{"title":"Towards Implementing Multispecies Harvest Strategies That Are Robust to Interacting Populations","authors":"Éva E. Plagányi, Jacob G. D. Rogers, Laura K. Blamey, Amelia A. Desbiens, Marjoleine M. H. Roos, Denham Parker","doi":"10.1111/faf.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A longstanding tenet of ecosystem‐based fisheries management (EBFM) is to account for trophic interactions given that all species exist as part of connected food webs. However, explicit incorporation of trophic interactions in tactical management models and decision‐making frameworks remains elusive. We draw on harvest strategy (HS) framework principles to advance the implementation of fisheries management that is Robust to Interacting Populations (RIP) and focus on simplifying and structuring it to be as pragmatic as possible. We posit that the objectives and the overall process can be structured using four main categories: (A) Whole‐of‐Ecosystem, which encompasses not exceeding the overall limits of system productivity and protecting overall ecosystem structure and function; (B) Identify and focus on key species and those with influential trophic connections that require more careful management because of the disproportional reliance of other species on these; (C) Species that interact with fisheries and are of conservation concern; and (D) pest or climate‐immigrant species with the objective of managing these to achieve desired outcomes for other (target) species in an ecosystem. For each category, we provide examples of the multispecies HS components required to inform decision‐making: indicators, data, reference levels, methods and decision rules, and identify common tools and opportunities. Finally, we summarise progress made and remaining gaps in our ability to collectively construct pragmatic guidelines for advancing EBFM and achieving RIP fisheries management to conserve marine ecosystem structure and functioning.","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.70009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A longstanding tenet of ecosystem‐based fisheries management (EBFM) is to account for trophic interactions given that all species exist as part of connected food webs. However, explicit incorporation of trophic interactions in tactical management models and decision‐making frameworks remains elusive. We draw on harvest strategy (HS) framework principles to advance the implementation of fisheries management that is Robust to Interacting Populations (RIP) and focus on simplifying and structuring it to be as pragmatic as possible. We posit that the objectives and the overall process can be structured using four main categories: (A) Whole‐of‐Ecosystem, which encompasses not exceeding the overall limits of system productivity and protecting overall ecosystem structure and function; (B) Identify and focus on key species and those with influential trophic connections that require more careful management because of the disproportional reliance of other species on these; (C) Species that interact with fisheries and are of conservation concern; and (D) pest or climate‐immigrant species with the objective of managing these to achieve desired outcomes for other (target) species in an ecosystem. For each category, we provide examples of the multispecies HS components required to inform decision‐making: indicators, data, reference levels, methods and decision rules, and identify common tools and opportunities. Finally, we summarise progress made and remaining gaps in our ability to collectively construct pragmatic guidelines for advancing EBFM and achieving RIP fisheries management to conserve marine ecosystem structure and functioning.
期刊介绍:
Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.