A systematic review and meta-analysis on the comorbidity of premenstrual dysphoric disorder or premenstrual syndrome with mood disorders: prevalence, clinical and neurobiological correlates
Deniz Bengi, Rebecca Strawbridge, Melisa Drorian, Mario F. Juruena, Allan Young, Benicio N. Frey, Nefize Yalin
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis on the comorbidity of premenstrual dysphoric disorder or premenstrual syndrome with mood disorders: prevalence, clinical and neurobiological correlates","authors":"Deniz Bengi, Rebecca Strawbridge, Melisa Drorian, Mario F. Juruena, Allan Young, Benicio N. Frey, Nefize Yalin","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2025.133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Background</span><p>Mood disorders are among the leading causes of disease burden worldwide, with 20–70% of affected individuals experiencing comorbid premenstrual disorders. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the comorbidity of premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) or premenstrual syndrome (PMS) with non-reproductive mood disorders.</p><span>Aims</span><p>We aimed to determine the pooled prevalence of PMDD/PMS with adult mood disorders, assess the impact of comorbidity on clinical course and summarise the associated neurobiological findings.</p><span>Method</span><p>Eligible studies were identified through Embase, MEDLINE and APA PsycINFO from inception to 22 January 2024 (PROSPERO, no. CRD42021246796). Studies on women (‘females‘) with diagnoses of PMDD/PMS and mood disorders were included. Risk of bias was assessed using National Institutes of Health quality assessment tools. A random-effects, pooled-prevalence meta-analysis was conducted using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, categorising diagnostic sampling strategies as follows: mood disorders diagnosed first, PMDD/PMS diagnosed first or concurrent diagnoses. A narrative synthesis explored secondary outcomes, including illness course and biomarkers.</p><span>Results</span><p>A total of 39 studies were included, with 36 of these (<span>n</span> = 3646) contributing to the meta-analysis. Seven studies focused on bipolar disorders, 18 on unipolar depressive disorders and 14 on mixed samples of bipolar and unipolar disorders. Random-effects pooled-prevalence meta-analyses showed consistently high comorbidity rates between PMDD/PMS and mood disorders, ranging from 42% (95% CI: 30%, 55%) to 49% (95% CI: 38%, 60%) across sampling strategies. Risk of bias varied, with methodological heterogeneity noted.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>This review underscores high comorbidity rates between PMDD/PMS and mood disorders, regardless of sampling strategy, and highlights the need for research into clinical and neurobiological characteristics specific to this comorbidity. Limitations include study heterogeneity, reliance on cross-sectional designs and provisional PMDD/PMS diagnoses. Future research should address these gaps to inform diagnostic and therapeutic advancements tailored to this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Mood disorders are among the leading causes of disease burden worldwide, with 20–70% of affected individuals experiencing comorbid premenstrual disorders. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the comorbidity of premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) or premenstrual syndrome (PMS) with non-reproductive mood disorders.
Aims
We aimed to determine the pooled prevalence of PMDD/PMS with adult mood disorders, assess the impact of comorbidity on clinical course and summarise the associated neurobiological findings.
Method
Eligible studies were identified through Embase, MEDLINE and APA PsycINFO from inception to 22 January 2024 (PROSPERO, no. CRD42021246796). Studies on women (‘females‘) with diagnoses of PMDD/PMS and mood disorders were included. Risk of bias was assessed using National Institutes of Health quality assessment tools. A random-effects, pooled-prevalence meta-analysis was conducted using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, categorising diagnostic sampling strategies as follows: mood disorders diagnosed first, PMDD/PMS diagnosed first or concurrent diagnoses. A narrative synthesis explored secondary outcomes, including illness course and biomarkers.
Results
A total of 39 studies were included, with 36 of these (n = 3646) contributing to the meta-analysis. Seven studies focused on bipolar disorders, 18 on unipolar depressive disorders and 14 on mixed samples of bipolar and unipolar disorders. Random-effects pooled-prevalence meta-analyses showed consistently high comorbidity rates between PMDD/PMS and mood disorders, ranging from 42% (95% CI: 30%, 55%) to 49% (95% CI: 38%, 60%) across sampling strategies. Risk of bias varied, with methodological heterogeneity noted.
Conclusions
This review underscores high comorbidity rates between PMDD/PMS and mood disorders, regardless of sampling strategy, and highlights the need for research into clinical and neurobiological characteristics specific to this comorbidity. Limitations include study heterogeneity, reliance on cross-sectional designs and provisional PMDD/PMS diagnoses. Future research should address these gaps to inform diagnostic and therapeutic advancements tailored to this population.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
