Convergence, Divergence, and Predictive Validity in Depression and Suicidality Screening Tools with Adjudicated Youth Across Ethnicity

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Joseph Calvin Gagnon, Jia Quan, Matthew L. Daley, Corinne Huggins-Manley, David E. Houchins, Holly B. Lane, Erica D. McCray, Richard G. Lambert
{"title":"Convergence, Divergence, and Predictive Validity in Depression and Suicidality Screening Tools with Adjudicated Youth Across Ethnicity","authors":"Joseph Calvin Gagnon, Jia Quan, Matthew L. Daley, Corinne Huggins-Manley, David E. Houchins, Holly B. Lane, Erica D. McCray, Richard G. Lambert","doi":"10.1177/01987429251349130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated the convergent and discriminant validity of scores from screening tools for depression (Traumatic Symptom Checklist for Children [TSCC], Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument-Second Version [MAYSI-2], Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale-Second Edition [RADS-2], Adolescent Psychopathology Scale, Short Form [APSSF-Short Form]) and suicidality (Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire Junior High School Version [SIQ-JR], MAYSI-2) with adjudicated youth. We also evaluated if convergent and divergent correlational relationships were statistically invariant across ethnic groups. Correlations evaluating convergent validity within subscales measuring depression and suicide ideation were <jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = 0.38–0.56. Correlations evaluating divergent evidence across depression and suicide ideation were <jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = 0.32–0.58. Concerning convergent correlations, both depression subscales and suicide ideation subscales were nearly 0.1 higher for White youth compared to African American youth. Results indicate that caution is needed when selecting screening tools and the importance of utilizing multiple sources of information, varied methods, and data from multiple settings. Additional results and implications are noted.","PeriodicalId":47249,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Disorders","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01987429251349130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the convergent and discriminant validity of scores from screening tools for depression (Traumatic Symptom Checklist for Children [TSCC], Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument-Second Version [MAYSI-2], Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale-Second Edition [RADS-2], Adolescent Psychopathology Scale, Short Form [APSSF-Short Form]) and suicidality (Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire Junior High School Version [SIQ-JR], MAYSI-2) with adjudicated youth. We also evaluated if convergent and divergent correlational relationships were statistically invariant across ethnic groups. Correlations evaluating convergent validity within subscales measuring depression and suicide ideation were r = 0.38–0.56. Correlations evaluating divergent evidence across depression and suicide ideation were r = 0.32–0.58. Concerning convergent correlations, both depression subscales and suicide ideation subscales were nearly 0.1 higher for White youth compared to African American youth. Results indicate that caution is needed when selecting screening tools and the importance of utilizing multiple sources of information, varied methods, and data from multiple settings. Additional results and implications are noted.
跨种族判定青少年抑郁和自杀筛查工具的趋同、差异和预测效度
本研究评估了判定青少年抑郁筛查工具(儿童创伤症状检查表[TSCC]、马萨诸塞州青少年筛查工具-第二版[MAYSI-2]、雷诺兹青少年抑郁量表-第二版[RADS-2]、青少年精神病理量表短表[apssf -短表])和自杀倾向(初中自杀意念问卷版[SIQ-JR], MAYSI-2)得分的收敛效度和判别效度。我们还评估了趋同和发散的相关关系在不同种族群体中是否具有统计上的不变性。在测量抑郁和自杀意念的子量表中,评估收敛效度的相关性为r = 0.38-0.56。评估抑郁和自杀意念之间的差异证据的相关性为r = 0.32-0.58。关于趋同相关性,白人青年的抑郁量表和自杀意念量表都比非裔美国青年高近0.1。结果表明,在选择筛选工具时需要谨慎,并强调利用多种信息来源、不同方法和来自多种设置的数据的重要性。还指出了其他结果和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Behavioral Disorders is sent to all members of the Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders (CCBD), a division of the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC). All CCBD members must first be members of CEC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信