Friendship Reciprocity, Stability, and Quality of Students With or at Risk for Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Kristen L. Granger, Jason C. Chow, Michael D. Broda, Meghan Reichel
{"title":"Friendship Reciprocity, Stability, and Quality of Students With or at Risk for Emotional and Behavioral Disorders","authors":"Kristen L. Granger, Jason C. Chow, Michael D. Broda, Meghan Reichel","doi":"10.1177/01987429251349115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to provide deeper insight into the substantive nature of the friendships of students with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. We examined the friendship nominations of Kindergarten to third grade students with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders (focal students), and their classmates, to describe the reciprocity, stability, and quality of friendships at two time points during the school year. Results revealed that a majority of focal students nominated at least one best friend in the beginning of the year. However, only 32% of these nominations were reciprocated by their classmates. Focal student’s reports of friendship quality did not differ between their reciprocated and unreciprocated nominations. Later in the year, 60% of the friendship nominations from Time 1 remained. However, focal student’s perceptions of friendship quality did not differ between the stable and unstable nominations. Finally, of the friendship nominations that were present at Time 1 and Time 2, approximately 48% were reciprocated. Findings reinforce that focal students experience social challenges, and that this population of students may overestimate the presence of reciprocal friendships. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of this work for research and practice.","PeriodicalId":47249,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Disorders","volume":"697 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01987429251349115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide deeper insight into the substantive nature of the friendships of students with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. We examined the friendship nominations of Kindergarten to third grade students with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders (focal students), and their classmates, to describe the reciprocity, stability, and quality of friendships at two time points during the school year. Results revealed that a majority of focal students nominated at least one best friend in the beginning of the year. However, only 32% of these nominations were reciprocated by their classmates. Focal student’s reports of friendship quality did not differ between their reciprocated and unreciprocated nominations. Later in the year, 60% of the friendship nominations from Time 1 remained. However, focal student’s perceptions of friendship quality did not differ between the stable and unstable nominations. Finally, of the friendship nominations that were present at Time 1 and Time 2, approximately 48% were reciprocated. Findings reinforce that focal students experience social challenges, and that this population of students may overestimate the presence of reciprocal friendships. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of this work for research and practice.
有或有情绪和行为障碍风险的学生的友谊互惠、稳定性和质量
本研究的目的是为了更深入地了解有情绪和行为障碍或有风险的学生的友谊的实质。我们检查了幼儿园到三年级有或有情绪和行为障碍风险的学生(焦点学生)及其同学的友谊提名,以描述在学年的两个时间点友谊的互惠性、稳定性和质量。结果显示,大多数焦点学生在年初提名了至少一个最好的朋友。然而,只有32%的提名得到了同学们的回应。焦点学生对友谊质量的报告在他们的互惠和非互惠提名之间没有差异。今年晚些时候,《时光1》中60%的友情提名保留了下来。然而,焦点学生对友谊质量的感知在稳定提名和不稳定提名之间没有差异。最后,在时间1和时间2出现的友谊提名中,大约48%得到了回报。研究结果强调,焦点学生经历了社会挑战,这群学生可能高估了互惠友谊的存在。最后,我们讨论了这项工作对研究和实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Behavioral Disorders is sent to all members of the Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders (CCBD), a division of the Council for Exceptional Children (CEC). All CCBD members must first be members of CEC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信