Do Examiners and Test-takers imitate each other? Dialogic resonance in second language testing

IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Vittorio Tantucci, Raffaella Bottini, Aiqing Wang
{"title":"Do Examiners and Test-takers imitate each other? Dialogic resonance in second language testing","authors":"Vittorio Tantucci, Raffaella Bottini, Aiqing Wang","doi":"10.1093/applin/amaf044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Do Test-takers imitate Examiners’ language use? What about the other way around? This paper is centred on the impact of verbal imitation in spoken L2 English language tests. We assessed this by measuring Test-takers’ and Examiners’ degrees of dialogic resonance (Du Bois, J. (2014) ‘Towards a dialogic syntax’, Cognitive Linguistics, 25: 359–410. doi: 10.1515/cog-2014-0024; Tantucci, V. (2023) ‘Resonance and recombinant creativity: Why they are important for research in Cognitive Linguistics and Pragmatics’, Intercultural Pragmatics, 20: 347–76. doi: 10.1515/ip-2023-4001), a key mechanism for learning and engagement. Resonance involves speakers’ ability to re-use words and expressions uttered by their interlocutors during an interaction. It is often creative and can be reliably measured as a continuous variable on a large scale (Tantucci, V., and Wang, A. (2021) ‘Resonance and engagement through (dis-) agreement: Evidence of persistent constructional priming from Mandarin naturalistic interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics, 175: 94–111. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002; Tantucci, V., and Wang, A. (2022a) ‘Resonance as an applied predictor of cross-cultural interaction: Constructional priming in Mandarin and American English interaction’, Applied Linguistics, 43: 115–46. doi: 10.1093/applin/amab012; Tantucci, V., and Wang, A. (2024) ‘British Conversation is Changing: Resonance and Engagement in the BNC1994 and the BNC2014’, Applied Linguistics, amae040; Tantucci, V., and Lepadat, C. (2024) ‘Verbal engagement in doctor–patient interaction: Resonance in Western and Traditional Chinese Medicine’, Journal of Pragmatics, 230: 126–41. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2024.07.002). We retrieved 2,564 turns from the Spoken Dialogues of the International Corpus Network of Asian Learners of English. We fitted a multifactorial mixed-effects linear regression of resonance between Examiners and Test-takers and found that verbal imitation plays different roles in language testing. First, resonance values are persistently high both in Test-takers and Examiners. Second, learners’ imitation is key in L2 pragmatic competence and proficiency: the more proficient learners are, the higher the resonance with their interlocutors. Most decisively, Examiners’ resonance improves Test-takers’ performance: the more an Examiner resonates with a Test-taker, the longer the Test-takers’ utterance in the following turn. We discuss implications for second language learning and language testing, and practical applications for Examiners’ training and language teaching materials development.","PeriodicalId":48234,"journal":{"name":"Applied Linguistics","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaf044","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Do Test-takers imitate Examiners’ language use? What about the other way around? This paper is centred on the impact of verbal imitation in spoken L2 English language tests. We assessed this by measuring Test-takers’ and Examiners’ degrees of dialogic resonance (Du Bois, J. (2014) ‘Towards a dialogic syntax’, Cognitive Linguistics, 25: 359–410. doi: 10.1515/cog-2014-0024; Tantucci, V. (2023) ‘Resonance and recombinant creativity: Why they are important for research in Cognitive Linguistics and Pragmatics’, Intercultural Pragmatics, 20: 347–76. doi: 10.1515/ip-2023-4001), a key mechanism for learning and engagement. Resonance involves speakers’ ability to re-use words and expressions uttered by their interlocutors during an interaction. It is often creative and can be reliably measured as a continuous variable on a large scale (Tantucci, V., and Wang, A. (2021) ‘Resonance and engagement through (dis-) agreement: Evidence of persistent constructional priming from Mandarin naturalistic interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics, 175: 94–111. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.002; Tantucci, V., and Wang, A. (2022a) ‘Resonance as an applied predictor of cross-cultural interaction: Constructional priming in Mandarin and American English interaction’, Applied Linguistics, 43: 115–46. doi: 10.1093/applin/amab012; Tantucci, V., and Wang, A. (2024) ‘British Conversation is Changing: Resonance and Engagement in the BNC1994 and the BNC2014’, Applied Linguistics, amae040; Tantucci, V., and Lepadat, C. (2024) ‘Verbal engagement in doctor–patient interaction: Resonance in Western and Traditional Chinese Medicine’, Journal of Pragmatics, 230: 126–41. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2024.07.002). We retrieved 2,564 turns from the Spoken Dialogues of the International Corpus Network of Asian Learners of English. We fitted a multifactorial mixed-effects linear regression of resonance between Examiners and Test-takers and found that verbal imitation plays different roles in language testing. First, resonance values are persistently high both in Test-takers and Examiners. Second, learners’ imitation is key in L2 pragmatic competence and proficiency: the more proficient learners are, the higher the resonance with their interlocutors. Most decisively, Examiners’ resonance improves Test-takers’ performance: the more an Examiner resonates with a Test-taker, the longer the Test-takers’ utterance in the following turn. We discuss implications for second language learning and language testing, and practical applications for Examiners’ training and language teaching materials development.
考官和考生会互相模仿吗?第二语言测试中的对话共振
考生是否模仿考官的语言用法?反过来呢?本文主要研究语言模仿对第二语言口语测试的影响。我们通过测量考生和考官的对话共振程度来评估这一点(Du Bois, J.(2014)“Towards a dialogic syntax”,认知语言学,25:359-410。- 2014 - 0024 . doi: 10.1515 /齿轮;Tantucci, V.(2023),“共鸣和重组创造力:为什么它们对认知语言学和语用学研究很重要”,《跨文化语用学》,20:347-76。Doi: 10.1515/ip-2023-4001),这是学习和参与的关键机制。共鸣涉及说话者在互动过程中重复使用对话者所说的单词和表达的能力。它通常是创造性的,并且可以作为一个大规模的连续变量可靠地测量(Tantucci, V., and Wang, a .(2021),“通过(不)一致的共鸣和参与:来自普通话自然主义互动的持续结构启动的证据”,《语用学杂志》,175:94-111。doi: 10.1016 / j.pragma.2021.01.002;(2009)“跨文化互动中的共振效应:普通话和美式英语互动中的结构启动效应”,《应用语言学》,第43期:115-46。doi: 10.1093 / applin / amab012;Tantucci, V.和Wang, A.(2024)“英国会话正在变化:BNC1994和BNC2014中的共鸣和参与”,《应用语言学》,2004;Tantucci, V.和Lepadat, C.(2024)“医患互动中的言语投入:中西医学的共鸣”,《语用学杂志》,230:126-41。doi: 10.1016 / j.pragma.2024.07.002)。我们从亚洲英语学习者国际语料库网络的口语对话中检索了2564个回合。我们对主考官和考生之间的共振进行了多因素混合效应线性回归,发现言语模仿在语言测试中发挥着不同的作用。首先,考生和考官的共鸣值都一直很高。第二,学习者的模仿是二语语用能力和熟练程度的关键:学习者越熟练,与对话者的共鸣就越高。最决定性的是,考官的共鸣提高了考生的表现:考官与考生的共鸣越多,考生在下一回合的话语就越长。我们讨论了对第二语言学习和语言测试的启示,以及对考官培训和语言教材开发的实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Linguistics
Applied Linguistics LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Applied Linguistics publishes research into language with relevance to real-world problems. The journal is keen to help make connections between fields, theories, research methods, and scholarly discourses, and welcomes contributions which critically reflect on current practices in applied linguistic research. It promotes scholarly and scientific discussion of issues that unite or divide scholars in applied linguistics. It is less interested in the ad hoc solution of particular problems and more interested in the handling of problems in a principled way by reference to theoretical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信