Challenges of combining multimodal data in assessment of people with traumatic brain injury

IF 28.2 1区医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

Nature Reviews Neurology Pub Date : 2025-07-11 DOI:10.1038/s41582-025-01121-7

Paul M. Brennan, Graham M. Teasdale

引用次数: 0

Abstract

A consensus recommendation has been made for a new classification system for traumatic brain injury. The new system adds complexity that might not benefit clinical decision making compared with the gold-standard Glasgow Coma Scale. Brennan and Teasdale compare a newly proposed classification system for traumatic brain injury with the gold-standard Glasgow Coma Scale.

查看原文本刊更多论文

将多模态数据结合评估创伤性脑损伤患者的挑战

对于创伤性脑损伤的新分类系统提出了一致的建议。与金标准格拉斯哥昏迷量表相比，新系统增加了复杂性，可能不利于临床决策。布伦南和蒂斯代尔将新提出的创伤性脑损伤分类系统与金标准格拉斯哥昏迷量表进行了比较。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Nature Reviews Neurology 医学-临床神经学

CiteScore

29.90

自引率

0.80%

发文量

138

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Nature Reviews Neurology aims to be the premier source of reviews and commentaries for the scientific and clinical communities we serve. We want to provide an unparalleled service to authors, referees, and readers, and we work hard to maximize the usefulness and impact of each article. The journal publishes Research Highlights, Comments, News & Views, Reviews, Consensus Statements, and Perspectives relevant to researchers and clinicians working in the field of neurology. Our broad scope ensures that the work we publish reaches the widest possible audience. Our articles are authoritative, accessible, and enhanced with clearly understandable figures, tables, and other display items. This page gives more detail about the aims and scope of the journal.