Selective splenectomy centered on graft-to-spleen volume ratio is a practical option in living donor liver transplantation to prevent early allograft dysfunction: A Prospective validation study.

Siyuan Yao, Masaaki Hirata, Takashi Ito, Hikaru Aoki, Ryuji Uozumi, Shinya Okumura, Yuuki Masano, Etsuro Hatano
{"title":"Selective splenectomy centered on graft-to-spleen volume ratio is a practical option in living donor liver transplantation to prevent early allograft dysfunction: A Prospective validation study.","authors":"Siyuan Yao, Masaaki Hirata, Takashi Ito, Hikaru Aoki, Ryuji Uozumi, Shinya Okumura, Yuuki Masano, Etsuro Hatano","doi":"10.1097/LVT.0000000000000678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While simultaneous splenectomy (SPX) is an option in selected cases of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to protect graft function, graft-to-spleen volume ratio (GSVR) may serve as a new determinant of SPX. A prospective validation study was conducted to test our institutional strategy of SPX based mainly on GSVR, which has been employed since 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study enrolled 141 LDLT recipients from 2019 to 2024. The indication for SPX was GSVR ≤0.70 and high-risk patients (ABO-incompatibility or donor age ≥45 y) with a final portal venous pressure >15 mmHg. Surgical outcomes related to graft function were evaluated and compared between the group with SPX (n=51), the group without SPX (n=90), and the historical control group without SPX despite GSVR of ≤0.70 (from 2007 to 2018, n=33). The risk factors for early allograft dysfunction (EAD) in the modern era were also investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Low GSVR indicated 88.2% (45 out of 51) of SPX in the prospective cohort. The historical group (no-SPX despite GSVR ≤0.70) showed an increased incidence of EAD with post-transplant thrombocytopenia, cholestasis, coagulopathy, and massive ascites. In contrast, these adverse events decreased significantly after introducing the new selective SPX protocol, with comparable results between the SPX and no-SPX groups in the prospective cohort. The Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was the only indicator of EAD in the multivariable analysis after 2019.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Selective SPX centered on GSVR is a feasible and practical option in LDLT to screen out high-risk recipients and improve their graft function for EAD prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":520704,"journal":{"name":"Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LVT.0000000000000678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While simultaneous splenectomy (SPX) is an option in selected cases of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to protect graft function, graft-to-spleen volume ratio (GSVR) may serve as a new determinant of SPX. A prospective validation study was conducted to test our institutional strategy of SPX based mainly on GSVR, which has been employed since 2019.

Methods: This prospective study enrolled 141 LDLT recipients from 2019 to 2024. The indication for SPX was GSVR ≤0.70 and high-risk patients (ABO-incompatibility or donor age ≥45 y) with a final portal venous pressure >15 mmHg. Surgical outcomes related to graft function were evaluated and compared between the group with SPX (n=51), the group without SPX (n=90), and the historical control group without SPX despite GSVR of ≤0.70 (from 2007 to 2018, n=33). The risk factors for early allograft dysfunction (EAD) in the modern era were also investigated.

Results: Low GSVR indicated 88.2% (45 out of 51) of SPX in the prospective cohort. The historical group (no-SPX despite GSVR ≤0.70) showed an increased incidence of EAD with post-transplant thrombocytopenia, cholestasis, coagulopathy, and massive ascites. In contrast, these adverse events decreased significantly after introducing the new selective SPX protocol, with comparable results between the SPX and no-SPX groups in the prospective cohort. The Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was the only indicator of EAD in the multivariable analysis after 2019.

Conclusions: Selective SPX centered on GSVR is a feasible and practical option in LDLT to screen out high-risk recipients and improve their graft function for EAD prevention.

以移植物与脾脏体积比为中心的选择性脾切除术是活体肝移植预防早期同种异体移植物功能障碍的一种实用选择:一项前瞻性验证研究。
背景:虽然在活体肝移植(LDLT)中,同时脾切除术(SPX)是一种保护移植物功能的选择,但移植物与脾脏体积比(GSVR)可能是SPX的一个新的决定因素。对我们自2019年开始采用的主要基于GSVR的SPX制度策略进行了前瞻性验证研究。方法:这项前瞻性研究在2019年至2024年期间招募了141名LDLT受体。SPX的适应症为GSVR≤0.70,且高危患者(abo血型不相容或供体年龄≥45岁)最终门静脉压为bb0 ~ 15mmhg。评估并比较SPX组(n=51)、未SPX组(n=90)和未SPX的历史对照组(2007 - 2018年,n=33)之间与移植物功能相关的手术结果,尽管GSVR≤0.70。对现代早期同种异体移植物功能障碍(EAD)的危险因素也进行了研究。结果:低GSVR表明在前瞻性队列中有88.2%(51人中有45人)的SPX。历史组(无spx,尽管GSVR≤0.70)显示移植后血小板减少、胆汁淤积、凝血功能障碍和大量腹水的EAD发生率增加。相比之下,在引入新的选择性SPX方案后,这些不良事件显著减少,在前瞻性队列中,SPX组和未SPX组之间的结果可比较。终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分是2019年后多变量分析中EAD的唯一指标。结论:以GSVR为中心的选择性SPX在LDLT中筛选高危受体,改善移植物功能以预防EAD是可行且实用的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信