Maintenance of Improvements in Walking Activity in Individuals with Chronic Stroke: Follow-Up From the PROWALKS Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 3.7
Neurorehabilitation and neural repair Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-10 DOI:10.1177/15459683251352493
Elizabeth D Thompson, Kiersten M McCartney, Ryan T Pohlig, T George Hornby, Scott E Kasner, Jonathan Raser-Schramm, Christopher E Henderson, Henry Wright, Tamara Wright, Darcy S Reisman
{"title":"Maintenance of Improvements in Walking Activity in Individuals with Chronic Stroke: Follow-Up From the PROWALKS Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Elizabeth D Thompson, Kiersten M McCartney, Ryan T Pohlig, T George Hornby, Scott E Kasner, Jonathan Raser-Schramm, Christopher E Henderson, Henry Wright, Tamara Wright, Darcy S Reisman","doi":"10.1177/15459683251352493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundIndividuals with chronic stroke are less active, which is both a consequence of stroke-related impairments and a risk factor for future health complications. The PROWALKS clinical trial found significant gains in real-world walking activity (steps/day) after 12 weeks of a step activity monitoring behavioral intervention, provided either alone (SAM) or with high-intensity gait training (FAST + SAM), but not after high-intensity gait training alone (FAST). Previous research in individuals after stroke suggests that tailored behavioral counseling may lead to better long-term physical activity participation, but no previous work has focused on post-intervention maintenance of walking activity changes.ObjectiveTo investigate whether steps/day changes after training (POST) were maintained at 6 months (6MO) and 12 months (12MO) after baseline. We hypothesized that SAM and FAST + SAM groups would have better maintenance of steps/day changes than the FAST group. <b><i>Methods</i>.</b> This analysis included all participants who completed the PROWALKS intervention (n = 200, mean[SD] age: 63.27[12.41], 102 male/98 female, >6 months post-stroke). Analysis outcomes were steps/day change from POST-6MO, and from POST-12MO.ResultsAll groups significantly decreased in steps/day from POST-6MO (<i>P</i> = .001, FAST decreased by mean[SE] 160[272], SAM by 1016[270], FAST + SAM by 400[300]), and POST-12MO (<i>P</i> < .001, FAST decreased by 610[280], SAM by 1072[306], FAST + SAM by 568[313]). There were no significant differences between groups.ConclusionsAll intervention groups showed significant declines in steps/day between POST and 6MO and between POST and 12MO. These results add to a growing body of literature suggesting that a behavioral intervention to <i>initiate</i> behavior change may not be sufficient for <i>maintenance</i> of change.Registration:This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02835313.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"779-788"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12313201/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683251352493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundIndividuals with chronic stroke are less active, which is both a consequence of stroke-related impairments and a risk factor for future health complications. The PROWALKS clinical trial found significant gains in real-world walking activity (steps/day) after 12 weeks of a step activity monitoring behavioral intervention, provided either alone (SAM) or with high-intensity gait training (FAST + SAM), but not after high-intensity gait training alone (FAST). Previous research in individuals after stroke suggests that tailored behavioral counseling may lead to better long-term physical activity participation, but no previous work has focused on post-intervention maintenance of walking activity changes.ObjectiveTo investigate whether steps/day changes after training (POST) were maintained at 6 months (6MO) and 12 months (12MO) after baseline. We hypothesized that SAM and FAST + SAM groups would have better maintenance of steps/day changes than the FAST group. Methods. This analysis included all participants who completed the PROWALKS intervention (n = 200, mean[SD] age: 63.27[12.41], 102 male/98 female, >6 months post-stroke). Analysis outcomes were steps/day change from POST-6MO, and from POST-12MO.ResultsAll groups significantly decreased in steps/day from POST-6MO (P = .001, FAST decreased by mean[SE] 160[272], SAM by 1016[270], FAST + SAM by 400[300]), and POST-12MO (P < .001, FAST decreased by 610[280], SAM by 1072[306], FAST + SAM by 568[313]). There were no significant differences between groups.ConclusionsAll intervention groups showed significant declines in steps/day between POST and 6MO and between POST and 12MO. These results add to a growing body of literature suggesting that a behavioral intervention to initiate behavior change may not be sufficient for maintenance of change.Registration:This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02835313.

慢性脑卒中患者步行活动改善的维持:PROWALKS随机对照试验的随访
背景:慢性中风患者活动量较少,这既是中风相关损伤的结果,也是未来健康并发症的风险因素。PROWALKS临床试验发现,单独(SAM)或高强度步态训练(FAST + SAM)进行12周的步骤活动监测行为干预后,实际步行活动(步数/天)显著增加,但单独进行高强度步态训练(FAST)后没有显著增加。先前对中风后个体的研究表明,量身定制的行为咨询可能会导致更好的长期体育活动参与,但之前的工作没有关注干预后步行活动变化的维持。目的探讨训练后步数/日变化(POST)在基线后6个月(6MO)和12个月(12MO)是否保持。我们假设SAM和FAST + SAM组比FAST组有更好的维持步数/天变化的能力。方法。该分析包括所有完成PROWALKS干预的参与者(n = 200,平均[SD]年龄:63.27[12.41],男性102人/女性98人,卒中后6个月)。分析结果为6mo后和12mo后的步数/天变化。结果与6mo后相比,所有组的步数/天均显著减少(P =。001, FAST减少了平均值[SE] 160[272], SAM减少了1016[270],FAST + SAM减少了400[300]),而POST-12MO (P启动行为改变可能不足以维持变化。注册:本研究注册在ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02835313。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信