The effect of 2 peg sleeve designs on test scores for the laparoscopic peg transfer task.

IF 1.1 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Emily M Austin, Boel A Fransson
{"title":"The effect of 2 peg sleeve designs on test scores for the laparoscopic peg transfer task.","authors":"Emily M Austin, Boel A Fransson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to determine how the use of 2 different peg sleeve designs would affect the scores of the peg transfer task in laparoscopic skills testing. A total of 22 participants were divided into 3 skill levels: inexperienced (DVM candidates), intermediate (ACVS residents), and expert laparoscopic surgeons (ACVS diplomates). All participants carried out the peg sleeve transfer task using 2 designs of peg sleeves on the same pegboard. The skills test was done in a laparoscopic trainer box using laparoscopic instruments. Participants were randomly assigned to the order in which the peg sleeve designs were tested. The score was based on time taken and errors made and was compared between peg transfers, while controlling for the skill level of the participant. Although no difference was detected between scores obtained using the 2 peg sleeve designs, a warm-up effect, <i>i.e.</i>, a higher score on the second run, was detected across all experience levels in this study population. It was concluded that the 2 sleeve designs appeared to have a minimal impact on the score for the task.</p>","PeriodicalId":93919,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire","volume":"89 3","pages":"100-104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12236092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine how the use of 2 different peg sleeve designs would affect the scores of the peg transfer task in laparoscopic skills testing. A total of 22 participants were divided into 3 skill levels: inexperienced (DVM candidates), intermediate (ACVS residents), and expert laparoscopic surgeons (ACVS diplomates). All participants carried out the peg sleeve transfer task using 2 designs of peg sleeves on the same pegboard. The skills test was done in a laparoscopic trainer box using laparoscopic instruments. Participants were randomly assigned to the order in which the peg sleeve designs were tested. The score was based on time taken and errors made and was compared between peg transfers, while controlling for the skill level of the participant. Although no difference was detected between scores obtained using the 2 peg sleeve designs, a warm-up effect, i.e., a higher score on the second run, was detected across all experience levels in this study population. It was concluded that the 2 sleeve designs appeared to have a minimal impact on the score for the task.

2钉套设计对腹腔镜钉转移任务测试分数的影响。
本研究的目的是确定如何使用两种不同的钉套设计将影响在腹腔镜技术测试中的钉转移任务的分数。共有22名参与者被分为3个技能水平:无经验(DVM候选人),中级(ACVS住院医师)和专家腹腔镜外科医生(ACVS文凭)。所有参与者在同一钉板上使用两种设计的钉套进行钉套转移任务。技能测试在使用腹腔镜器械的腹腔镜训练箱中完成。参与者被随机分配到测试栓套设计的顺序。分数是基于所花费的时间和所犯的错误,并在控制参与者的技能水平的同时,在peg转移之间进行比较。虽然在使用两种栓套设计获得的分数之间没有发现差异,但在本研究人群的所有经验水平中都检测到热身效应,即在第二次运行时获得更高的分数。结论是,这两种袖子的设计似乎对任务的得分影响最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信