Midterm Outcomes of Graft Insertion Technique for Redo Aortic Root Surgery.

IF 1.3
Takuya Narita, Ai Ishizawa, Nobuyuki Inoue, Tetsuro Uchida, Yoshitsugu Nakamura
{"title":"Midterm Outcomes of Graft Insertion Technique for Redo Aortic Root Surgery.","authors":"Takuya Narita, Ai Ishizawa, Nobuyuki Inoue, Tetsuro Uchida, Yoshitsugu Nakamura","doi":"10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the midterm outcomes, including adverse aortic events (AAEs), of the \"graft insertion technique\" (GIT) for left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and aortic root reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From August 2014 to March 2024, 14 consecutive patients underwent GIT for LVOT and aortic root reconstruction. The indications for surgery were prosthetic valve endocarditis in 9 cases and noninfectious pseudoaneurysm in 5 cases. Among these patients, seven (50.0%) underwent aortic root surgery, while the other seven (50.0%) underwent aortic valve replacement alone or in combination with other procedures without aortic root surgery. Their mean EuroSCORE II was 28.8 ± 17.6.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean total operation time was 504 ± 87 min. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were 311 ± 41 and 240 ± 45 min, respectively. Operative mortality occurred in one case (7.1%), and five patients (35.7%) died during the first year of follow-up. No surviving patients experienced recurrent endocarditis. No patients died from cardiovascular events or infections after the second year of follow-up. Furthermore, no AAEs were observed on computed tomography during the follow-up period after hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GIT is a feasible alternative for high-risk cases of redo aortic root surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":93877,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12256150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the midterm outcomes, including adverse aortic events (AAEs), of the "graft insertion technique" (GIT) for left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and aortic root reconstruction.

Methods: From August 2014 to March 2024, 14 consecutive patients underwent GIT for LVOT and aortic root reconstruction. The indications for surgery were prosthetic valve endocarditis in 9 cases and noninfectious pseudoaneurysm in 5 cases. Among these patients, seven (50.0%) underwent aortic root surgery, while the other seven (50.0%) underwent aortic valve replacement alone or in combination with other procedures without aortic root surgery. Their mean EuroSCORE II was 28.8 ± 17.6.

Results: The mean total operation time was 504 ± 87 min. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were 311 ± 41 and 240 ± 45 min, respectively. Operative mortality occurred in one case (7.1%), and five patients (35.7%) died during the first year of follow-up. No surviving patients experienced recurrent endocarditis. No patients died from cardiovascular events or infections after the second year of follow-up. Furthermore, no AAEs were observed on computed tomography during the follow-up period after hospital discharge.

Conclusion: GIT is a feasible alternative for high-risk cases of redo aortic root surgery.

重做主动脉根部手术移植物插入技术的中期结果。
目的:本研究评估“移植物插入技术”(GIT)用于左心室流出道(LVOT)和主动脉根部重建的中期结果,包括主动脉不良事件(AAEs)。方法:2014年8月至2024年3月,连续14例患者行GIT行LVOT和主动脉根重建。手术指征为人工瓣膜心内膜炎9例,非感染性假性动脉瘤5例。在这些患者中,7例(50.0%)接受了主动脉根部手术,而另外7例(50.0%)接受了主动脉瓣置换术或联合其他手术,但没有进行主动脉根部手术。平均EuroSCORE II为28.8±17.6。结果:平均总手术时间为504±87 min,平均体外循环时间为311±41 min,主动脉交叉夹持时间为240±45 min。手术死亡1例(7.1%),5例(35.7%)患者在随访第一年死亡。存活患者无复发性心内膜炎。在随访的第二年,没有患者死于心血管事件或感染。此外,在出院后的随访期间,计算机断层扫描未观察到ae。结论:GIT是高危患者重做主动脉根部手术的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信