"Well, You Think Rabbits, You Think Rabbit Hutch" - Public Perception of Companion Rabbit Ownership and Accommodation.

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Natalie Powdrill-Wells, Samantha Ryan, Kattie Stoneman, Fiona Cooke
{"title":"\"Well, You Think Rabbits, You Think Rabbit Hutch\" - Public Perception of Companion Rabbit Ownership and Accommodation.","authors":"Natalie Powdrill-Wells, Samantha Ryan, Kattie Stoneman, Fiona Cooke","doi":"10.1080/10888705.2025.2529456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite protection under the Animal Welfare Act 2006, rabbits in the United Kingdom are often housed in inadequate environments. In this study, semi-structured interviews were used to explore public perceptions of companion rabbit ownership and accommodation requirements. Thematic analysis revealed that participant views about keeping rabbits as companion animals varied, including their perceptions of the care they require. Seventy-one percent of the participants with previous rabbit ownership experience were unlikely to consider rabbit ownership again, mainly due to the realities of rabbit care. Tradition and the lack of visibility of good practice were cited as key influences behind perceptions of appropriate rabbit accommodation. Participants lacked awareness of the minimum space required for adequate rabbit accommodation within the Good Practice Code for the Welfare of Rabbits. Acquisition sources were considered an important avenue for advice about appropriate rabbit accommodation provision. Owner ability to suitably provide for rabbit needs was highlighted as a significant issue. Ultimately with conflict between what society can provide and rabbit welfare needs, the future of rabbits as companion animals in the United Kingdom is uncertain.</p>","PeriodicalId":56277,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2025.2529456","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite protection under the Animal Welfare Act 2006, rabbits in the United Kingdom are often housed in inadequate environments. In this study, semi-structured interviews were used to explore public perceptions of companion rabbit ownership and accommodation requirements. Thematic analysis revealed that participant views about keeping rabbits as companion animals varied, including their perceptions of the care they require. Seventy-one percent of the participants with previous rabbit ownership experience were unlikely to consider rabbit ownership again, mainly due to the realities of rabbit care. Tradition and the lack of visibility of good practice were cited as key influences behind perceptions of appropriate rabbit accommodation. Participants lacked awareness of the minimum space required for adequate rabbit accommodation within the Good Practice Code for the Welfare of Rabbits. Acquisition sources were considered an important avenue for advice about appropriate rabbit accommodation provision. Owner ability to suitably provide for rabbit needs was highlighted as a significant issue. Ultimately with conflict between what society can provide and rabbit welfare needs, the future of rabbits as companion animals in the United Kingdom is uncertain.

“好吧,你想到兔子,你就想到兔子窝”——公众对养伴兔和住宿的看法。
尽管受到《2006年动物福利法》的保护,但在英国,兔子经常被安置在不适当的环境中。在本研究中,采用半结构化访谈来探讨公众对伴侣兔所有权和住宿要求的看法。主题分析显示,参与者对养兔子作为伴侣动物的看法各不相同,包括他们对兔子需要照顾的看法。71%以前有过养兔经历的参与者不太可能再考虑养兔,主要是由于照顾兔子的现实。传统和缺乏良好做法的可见性被认为是对适当饲养兔子的看法背后的关键影响。参加者没有意识到兔子福利良好操作守则所规定的足够兔子住宿的最小空间。收购来源被认为是提供适当的兔子住宿建议的重要途径。主人适当满足兔子需求的能力被强调为一个重要问题。最终,由于社会所能提供的与兔子福利需求之间的冲突,兔子在英国作为伴侣动物的未来是不确定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science (JAAWS) publishes articles on methods of experimentation, husbandry, and care that demonstrably enhance the welfare of nonhuman animals in various settings. For administrative purposes, manuscripts are categorized into the following four content areas: welfare issues arising in laboratory, farm, companion animal, and wildlife/zoo settings. Manuscripts of up to 7,000 words are accepted that present new empirical data or a reevaluation of available data, conceptual or theoretical analysis, or demonstrations relating to some issue of animal welfare science. JAAWS also publishes brief research reports of up to 3,500 words that consist of (1) pilot studies, (2) descriptions of innovative practices, (3) studies of interest to a particular region, or (4) studies done by scholars who are new to the field or new to academic publishing. In addition, JAAWS publishes book reviews and literature reviews by invitation only.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信