Evaluation of the effects of cognitive stimulation therapy on cognitive status and apathy in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ejdane Coşkun, Ayşe İnel Manav
{"title":"Evaluation of the effects of cognitive stimulation therapy on cognitive status and apathy in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Ejdane Coşkun, Ayşe İnel Manav","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2527732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of cognitive stimulation therapy on cognitive status and apathy in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. It is a randomized controlled experimental study. The research was conducted in a care center located in a province in Turkey between October 30, 2023, and December 25, 2023. A total of 62 individuals, including 31 in the intervention group and 31 in the control group, were included in the study, forming the research sample. The data for the study were collected using the \"Personal Information Form,\" the \"Standardized Mini-Mental Test (SMMSE),\" and the \" Apathy Rating Scale (ARS).\" Cognitive Stimulation Therapy was administered twice a week for a total of 14 sessions in the form of group therapy. Following the implementation of Cognitive Stimulation Therapy, a comparison between the intervention and control groups revealed significant differences in post-test outcomes. The Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE) post-test scores averaged 24.3 ± 1.3 in the intervention group, whereas the control group recorded a lower mean score of 19.6 ± 1.5. Similarly, in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ARS), the intervention group achieved a mean score of 47.5 ± 3.5, compared to 36.2 ± 3.0 in the control group. It was determined that the mean scores of individuals in the intervention group increased significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Cognitive Stimulation Therapy has been found to be effective in improving cognitive functions and reducing apathy levels in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Therefore, it is recommended that psychiatric nurses providing care for geriatric individuals implement Cognitive Stimulation Therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2527732","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of cognitive stimulation therapy on cognitive status and apathy in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. It is a randomized controlled experimental study. The research was conducted in a care center located in a province in Turkey between October 30, 2023, and December 25, 2023. A total of 62 individuals, including 31 in the intervention group and 31 in the control group, were included in the study, forming the research sample. The data for the study were collected using the "Personal Information Form," the "Standardized Mini-Mental Test (SMMSE)," and the " Apathy Rating Scale (ARS)." Cognitive Stimulation Therapy was administered twice a week for a total of 14 sessions in the form of group therapy. Following the implementation of Cognitive Stimulation Therapy, a comparison between the intervention and control groups revealed significant differences in post-test outcomes. The Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE) post-test scores averaged 24.3 ± 1.3 in the intervention group, whereas the control group recorded a lower mean score of 19.6 ± 1.5. Similarly, in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ARS), the intervention group achieved a mean score of 47.5 ± 3.5, compared to 36.2 ± 3.0 in the control group. It was determined that the mean scores of individuals in the intervention group increased significantly (p < 0.001). Cognitive Stimulation Therapy has been found to be effective in improving cognitive functions and reducing apathy levels in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Therefore, it is recommended that psychiatric nurses providing care for geriatric individuals implement Cognitive Stimulation Therapy.

评估认知刺激疗法对轻度认知障碍老年人认知状态和冷漠的影响:一项随机对照试验。
本研究旨在评估认知刺激疗法对老年轻度认知障碍患者认知状态和冷漠的影响。这是一项随机对照实验研究。该研究于2023年10月30日至2023年12月25日在土耳其一个省的一家护理中心进行。研究共纳入62人,其中干预组31人,对照组31人,构成研究样本。该研究的数据是通过“个人信息表”、“标准化迷你智力测试(SMMSE)”和“冷漠评定量表(ARS)”收集的。认知刺激疗法以小组治疗的形式进行,每周两次,共14次。在实施认知刺激疗法后,干预组和对照组之间的比较显示了测试后结果的显着差异。干预组的标准化简易精神状态检查(SMMSE)测试后平均得分为24.3±1.3分,而对照组的平均得分为19.6±1.5分。同样,在阿尔茨海默病评估量表-认知子量表(ARS)中,干预组的平均得分为47.5±3.5分,对照组为36.2±3.0分。结果表明,干预组个体的平均得分显著提高(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信