Berg Balance Scale score is a valuable predictor of all-cause mortality among acute decompensated heart failure patients.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yu-Xuan Fan, Jing-Jing Cheng, Zhi-Qing Fan, Jing-Jin Liu, Wen-Juan Xiu, Meng-Yi Zhan, Lin Luo, Guang-He Li, Le-Min Wang, Yu-Qin Shen
{"title":"Berg Balance Scale score is a valuable predictor of all-cause mortality among acute decompensated heart failure patients.","authors":"Yu-Xuan Fan, Jing-Jing Cheng, Zhi-Qing Fan, Jing-Jin Liu, Wen-Juan Xiu, Meng-Yi Zhan, Lin Luo, Guang-He Li, Le-Min Wang, Yu-Qin Shen","doi":"10.26599/1671-5411.2025.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate possible associations between physical function assessment scales, such as Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS), with all-cause mortality in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 108 ADHF patients were analyzed from October 2020 to October 2022, and followed up to May 2023. The association between baseline clinical characteristics and all-cause mortality was analyzed by univariate Cox regression analysis, while for SPPB and BBS, univariate Cox regression analysis was followed by receiver operating characteristic curves, in which the area under the curve represented their predictive accuracy for all-cause mortality. Incremental predictive values for both physical function assessments were measured by calculating net reclassification index and integrated discrimination improvement scores. Optimal cut-off value for BBS was then identified using restricted cubic spline plots, and survival differences below and above that cut-off were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the log-rank test. The clinical utility of BBS was measured using decision curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For baseline characteristics, age, female, blood urea nitrogen, as well as statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, were predictive for all-cause mortality for ADHF patients. With respect to SPPB and BBS, higher scores were associated with lower all-cause mortality rates for both assessments; similar area under the curves were measured for both (0.774 for SPPB and 0.776 for BBS). Furthermore, BBS ≤ 36.5 was associated with significantly higher mortality, which was still applicable even adjusting for confounding factors; BBS was also found to have great clinical utility under decision curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BBS or SPPB could be used as tools to assess physical function in ageing ADHF patients, as well as prognosticate on all-cause mortality. Moreover, prioritizing the improvement of balance capabilities of ADHF patients in cardiac rehabilitation regimens could aid in lowering mortality risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":51294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Cardiology","volume":"22 6","pages":"555-562"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235013/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26599/1671-5411.2025.06.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate possible associations between physical function assessment scales, such as Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS), with all-cause mortality in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) patients.

Methods: A total of 108 ADHF patients were analyzed from October 2020 to October 2022, and followed up to May 2023. The association between baseline clinical characteristics and all-cause mortality was analyzed by univariate Cox regression analysis, while for SPPB and BBS, univariate Cox regression analysis was followed by receiver operating characteristic curves, in which the area under the curve represented their predictive accuracy for all-cause mortality. Incremental predictive values for both physical function assessments were measured by calculating net reclassification index and integrated discrimination improvement scores. Optimal cut-off value for BBS was then identified using restricted cubic spline plots, and survival differences below and above that cut-off were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the log-rank test. The clinical utility of BBS was measured using decision curve analysis.

Results: For baseline characteristics, age, female, blood urea nitrogen, as well as statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, were predictive for all-cause mortality for ADHF patients. With respect to SPPB and BBS, higher scores were associated with lower all-cause mortality rates for both assessments; similar area under the curves were measured for both (0.774 for SPPB and 0.776 for BBS). Furthermore, BBS ≤ 36.5 was associated with significantly higher mortality, which was still applicable even adjusting for confounding factors; BBS was also found to have great clinical utility under decision curve analysis.

Conclusions: BBS or SPPB could be used as tools to assess physical function in ageing ADHF patients, as well as prognosticate on all-cause mortality. Moreover, prioritizing the improvement of balance capabilities of ADHF patients in cardiac rehabilitation regimens could aid in lowering mortality risk.

伯格平衡量表评分是急性失代偿心力衰竭患者全因死亡率的一个有价值的预测指标。
目的:探讨短体能测试量表(SPPB)和Berg平衡量表(BBS)与急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)患者全因死亡率之间的关系。方法:对2020年10月至2022年10月收治的108例ADHF患者进行分析,并随访至2023年5月。基线临床特征与全因死亡率的关系采用单因素Cox回归分析,SPPB和BBS采用单因素Cox回归分析后绘制受试者工作特征曲线,曲线下面积代表其对全因死亡率的预测精度。通过计算净重分类指数和综合判别改善分数来测量两种身体功能评估的增量预测值。然后使用限制性三次样条图确定BBS的最佳临界值,并使用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和log-rank检验比较临界值以下和以上的生存差异。使用决策曲线分析来衡量BBS的临床效用。结果:对于基线特征,年龄、女性、血尿素氮以及他汀类药物、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂或血管紧张素受体-萘普利素抑制剂可预测ADHF患者的全因死亡率。就SPPB和BBS而言,得分越高,两项评估的全因死亡率越低;两者曲线下面积相近(SPPB为0.774,BBS为0.776)。此外,BBS≤36.5与死亡率显著升高相关,即使校正了混杂因素,这一结论仍然适用;决策曲线分析也发现BBS有很大的临床应用价值。结论:BBS或SPPB可作为评估老年ADHF患者身体功能以及预测全因死亡率的工具。此外,在心脏康复方案中优先提高ADHF患者的平衡能力有助于降低死亡风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geriatric Cardiology
Journal of Geriatric Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1161
期刊介绍: JGC focuses on both basic research and clinical practice to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease in the aged people, especially those with concomitant disease of other major organ-systems, such as the lungs, the kidneys, liver, central nervous system, gastrointestinal tract or endocrinology, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信