Prevalence and factors associated with potentially inappropriate medications in elderly stroke patients: A comparison of Beers 2019 and 2023 criteria.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Xiaofang Tan, Xiaoqun Lv, Weigen Xiong, Yujuan Liu, Ning Zhang
{"title":"Prevalence and factors associated with potentially inappropriate medications in elderly stroke patients: A comparison of Beers 2019 and 2023 criteria.","authors":"Xiaofang Tan, Xiaoqun Lv, Weigen Xiong, Yujuan Liu, Ning Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s44446-025-00029-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polypharmacy is widespread among older adults with ischemic stroke (IS), which may increase the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). This study aimed to determine the prevalence and factors associated with PIMs in hospitalized IS patients using the 2019 and 2023 Beers criteria.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study by extracting electronic medical records of hospitalized elderly IS patients (aged ≥ 65 years) at Jinshan Hospital of Fudan University from January to December 2021. PIMs were identified based on the 2019 and 2023 Beers criteria. The coherence of the two criteria was evaluated via the kappa test. Poisson regression was performed to identify factors associated with PIM use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 559 elderly IS patients were included in the study. According to the 2023 Beers criteria, 43.29% of patients used at least one PIM, compared with 38.82% based on the 2019 Beers criteria. The three most frequently identified PIM classes in both versions were antipsychotics, diuretics, and antidepressants. The kappa value was 0.908 (P < 0.001), indicating strong coherence between the two criteria. Female sex, a higher number of prescribed medications, and longer hospital stays were significantly associated with increased PIM use. Across both sets of criteria, the number of prescribed medications was identified as the strongest factor associated with PIM use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall prevalence of PIMs was slightly higher according to the 2023 Beers criteria than the 2019 version. PIM use was more prevalent among older female IS inpatients with excessive polypharmacy and hospital stays of 21 days or longer.</p>","PeriodicalId":49257,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal","volume":"33 4","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12246315/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44446-025-00029-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Polypharmacy is widespread among older adults with ischemic stroke (IS), which may increase the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). This study aimed to determine the prevalence and factors associated with PIMs in hospitalized IS patients using the 2019 and 2023 Beers criteria.

Method: We conducted a cross-sectional study by extracting electronic medical records of hospitalized elderly IS patients (aged ≥ 65 years) at Jinshan Hospital of Fudan University from January to December 2021. PIMs were identified based on the 2019 and 2023 Beers criteria. The coherence of the two criteria was evaluated via the kappa test. Poisson regression was performed to identify factors associated with PIM use.

Results: A total of 559 elderly IS patients were included in the study. According to the 2023 Beers criteria, 43.29% of patients used at least one PIM, compared with 38.82% based on the 2019 Beers criteria. The three most frequently identified PIM classes in both versions were antipsychotics, diuretics, and antidepressants. The kappa value was 0.908 (P < 0.001), indicating strong coherence between the two criteria. Female sex, a higher number of prescribed medications, and longer hospital stays were significantly associated with increased PIM use. Across both sets of criteria, the number of prescribed medications was identified as the strongest factor associated with PIM use.

Conclusion: The overall prevalence of PIMs was slightly higher according to the 2023 Beers criteria than the 2019 version. PIM use was more prevalent among older female IS inpatients with excessive polypharmacy and hospital stays of 21 days or longer.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

老年中风患者的患病率和与潜在不适当药物相关的因素:Beers 2019和2023标准的比较
背景:多种用药在老年缺血性卒中(is)患者中很普遍,这可能会增加潜在不适当药物(pim)的患病率。本研究旨在使用2019年和2023年Beers标准确定IS住院患者中pim的患病率和相关因素。方法:提取复旦大学金山医院2021年1 - 12月住院老年IS患者(年龄≥65岁)的电子病历,进行横断面研究。pim是根据2019年和2023年比尔斯的标准确定的。两个标准的一致性通过卡帕测试进行评估。使用泊松回归来确定与PIM使用相关的因素。结果:共纳入559例老年IS患者。根据2023年比尔斯的标准,43.29%的患者至少使用一种PIM,而根据2019年比尔斯的标准,这一比例为38.82%。在两个版本中,三个最常见的PIM类别是抗精神病药、利尿剂和抗抑郁药。kappa值为0.908 (P)。结论:根据2023年Beers标准,pim的总体患病率略高于2019年版本。PIM的使用在过度使用多种药物且住院时间超过21天的老年女性IS住院患者中更为普遍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal
Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
194
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal (SPJ) is the official journal of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society (SPS) publishing high quality clinically oriented submissions which encompass the various disciplines of pharmaceutical sciences and related subjects. SPJ publishes 8 issues per year by the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, with the cooperation of the College of Pharmacy, King Saud University.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信