Development of a technology-enhanced patient-reported outcome evaluation system for inflammatory bowel disease: A multidimensional approach to assessing survival quality.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Qian Jiang, Ling Du
{"title":"Development of a technology-enhanced patient-reported outcome evaluation system for inflammatory bowel disease: A multidimensional approach to assessing survival quality.","authors":"Qian Jiang, Ling Du","doi":"10.1177/09287329251356943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundInflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) significantly affects patients' long-term health and survival quality. Accurate and technology-driven assessment tools are essential for monitoring disease impact and optimizing individualized treatment strategies.ObjectiveTo develop a standardized and technology-enhanced evaluation system for IBD based on patient-reported outcomes (IBDPRO), enabling a comprehensive and dynamic assessment of patients' survival quality.MethodsA multidimensional evaluation system was constructed using the three-dimensional quality structure model. The framework incorporated expert consensus through the Delphi method, semi-structured interviews, and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for weight assignment. A digital platform based on the REDCap system was used for data collection and patient follow-up. Statistical correlations were analyzed between survival quality scores and disease activity indices (PMS and HBI), as well as subjective self-assessments.ResultsHigh expert authority coefficients (0.926, 0.931) and significant agreement levels (Kendall's W = 0.226, 0.239, P < 0.01) were achieved. survival quality was strongly negatively correlated with disease activity (Spearman's r = -0.76, P < 0.001) and positively correlated with patients' self-perceived condition changes (r = 0.79, P < 0.001). The system demonstrated reliability, validity, and responsiveness across multiple dimensions.ConclusionsThe IBDPRO system provides a scientifically rigorous and technologically integrated method for evaluating the survival quality in IBD patients. This approach facilitates data-driven clinical decision-making and supports a transition toward personalized, patient-centered healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"9287329251356943"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329251356943","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundInflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) significantly affects patients' long-term health and survival quality. Accurate and technology-driven assessment tools are essential for monitoring disease impact and optimizing individualized treatment strategies.ObjectiveTo develop a standardized and technology-enhanced evaluation system for IBD based on patient-reported outcomes (IBDPRO), enabling a comprehensive and dynamic assessment of patients' survival quality.MethodsA multidimensional evaluation system was constructed using the three-dimensional quality structure model. The framework incorporated expert consensus through the Delphi method, semi-structured interviews, and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for weight assignment. A digital platform based on the REDCap system was used for data collection and patient follow-up. Statistical correlations were analyzed between survival quality scores and disease activity indices (PMS and HBI), as well as subjective self-assessments.ResultsHigh expert authority coefficients (0.926, 0.931) and significant agreement levels (Kendall's W = 0.226, 0.239, P < 0.01) were achieved. survival quality was strongly negatively correlated with disease activity (Spearman's r = -0.76, P < 0.001) and positively correlated with patients' self-perceived condition changes (r = 0.79, P < 0.001). The system demonstrated reliability, validity, and responsiveness across multiple dimensions.ConclusionsThe IBDPRO system provides a scientifically rigorous and technologically integrated method for evaluating the survival quality in IBD patients. This approach facilitates data-driven clinical decision-making and supports a transition toward personalized, patient-centered healthcare.

一种技术增强的炎症性肠病患者报告结果评估系统的开发:一种评估生存质量的多维方法。
背景:炎症性肠病(IBD)显著影响患者的长期健康和生存质量。准确和技术驱动的评估工具对于监测疾病影响和优化个性化治疗策略至关重要。目的建立标准化、技术增强的IBD患者报告预后(IBDPRO)评价体系,实现对患者生存质量的全面、动态评估。方法采用三维质量结构模型构建多维评价体系。该框架通过德尔菲法、半结构化访谈和层次分析法(AHP)纳入专家共识来分配权重。使用基于REDCap系统的数字平台进行数据收集和患者随访。分析生存质量评分与疾病活动指数(PMS和HBI)以及主观自我评价之间的统计学相关性。结果专家权威系数高(0.926,0.931),一致性显著(Kendall’s W = 0.226, 0.239, P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Technology and Health Care
Technology and Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
282
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered: 1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables. 2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words. Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics. 4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors. 5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信