Submucosal saline injection and mini-probe endoscopic ultrasound to assess endoscopic resectability of colorectal subepithelial tumors.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jung-Bin Park, Ji Eun Baek, June Hwa Bae, Seung Wook Hong, Sung Wook Hwang, Sang Hyoung Park, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Dong-Hoon Yang
{"title":"Submucosal saline injection and mini-probe endoscopic ultrasound to assess endoscopic resectability of colorectal subepithelial tumors.","authors":"Jung-Bin Park, Ji Eun Baek, June Hwa Bae, Seung Wook Hong, Sung Wook Hwang, Sang Hyoung Park, Byong Duk Ye, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Dong-Hoon Yang","doi":"10.3904/kjim.2024.384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of mini-probe endoscopic ultrasound (mEUS) followed by submucosal saline injection (SSI-mEUS) for assessing the endoscopic resectability of colorectal subepithelial lesions (SELs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2020 to December 2023, the medical records of 391 SELs (364 patients) were retrospectively reviewed and categorized into no EUS, mEUS-only, and SSI-mEUS groups according to the procedure used. To compare variables between the SSI-mEUS and other groups, the no EUS and mEUS-only groups were combined into the non-SSI-mEUS group. In the SSI-mEUS group, submucosal cushion thickness was endosonographically measured after the saline injection. Treatment outcomes and histological diagnosis were retrospectively reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 210 lesions in the no EUS group, 23 in the mEUS-only group, and 125 in the SSI-mEUS group were endoscopically resected. The mean SEL size was larger in the SSI-mEUS than in the non-SSI-mEUS group (6.8 ± 2.6 mm vs. 4.9 ± 2.6 mm, p < 0.001). R0 resection was achieved in 107 of 110 neoplastic lesions (97.3%) in the SSI-mEUS group vs. 159 of 176 neoplastic lesions (90.3%) in the non-SSI-mEUS group (p = 0.046). Not using SSI-mEUS was the only factor associated with indeterminate or positive deep resection margins (odds ratio 3.45, 95% confidence interval 1.19-13.40, p = 0.021).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For colorectal SELs, including those that appear insufficiently elevated during conventional endoscopy, SSI-mEUS enables an objective assessment of the feasibility of endoscopic resection and can predict a high likelihood of achieving a safe and complete resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":48785,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"40 4","pages":"592-605"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2024.384","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of mini-probe endoscopic ultrasound (mEUS) followed by submucosal saline injection (SSI-mEUS) for assessing the endoscopic resectability of colorectal subepithelial lesions (SELs).

Methods: From January 2020 to December 2023, the medical records of 391 SELs (364 patients) were retrospectively reviewed and categorized into no EUS, mEUS-only, and SSI-mEUS groups according to the procedure used. To compare variables between the SSI-mEUS and other groups, the no EUS and mEUS-only groups were combined into the non-SSI-mEUS group. In the SSI-mEUS group, submucosal cushion thickness was endosonographically measured after the saline injection. Treatment outcomes and histological diagnosis were retrospectively reviewed.

Results: A total of 210 lesions in the no EUS group, 23 in the mEUS-only group, and 125 in the SSI-mEUS group were endoscopically resected. The mean SEL size was larger in the SSI-mEUS than in the non-SSI-mEUS group (6.8 ± 2.6 mm vs. 4.9 ± 2.6 mm, p < 0.001). R0 resection was achieved in 107 of 110 neoplastic lesions (97.3%) in the SSI-mEUS group vs. 159 of 176 neoplastic lesions (90.3%) in the non-SSI-mEUS group (p = 0.046). Not using SSI-mEUS was the only factor associated with indeterminate or positive deep resection margins (odds ratio 3.45, 95% confidence interval 1.19-13.40, p = 0.021).

Conclusion: For colorectal SELs, including those that appear insufficiently elevated during conventional endoscopy, SSI-mEUS enables an objective assessment of the feasibility of endoscopic resection and can predict a high likelihood of achieving a safe and complete resection.

粘膜下生理盐水注射和微型探针内镜超声评估结肠直肠上皮下肿瘤的内镜可切除性。
背景/目的:本研究旨在评估微型探针内镜超声(mEUS)联合粘膜下生理盐水注射(SSI-mEUS)评估结肠直肠上皮下病变(SELs)内镜可切除性的可行性和结果。方法:回顾性分析2020年1月至2023年12月391例SELs患者(364例)的医疗记录,并根据使用的方法将其分为无EUS、仅meus和SSI-mEUS组。为了比较SSI-mEUS与其他组之间的变量,将无EUS组和仅meus组合并为无SSI-mEUS组。SSI-mEUS组在生理盐水注射后通过超声测量粘膜下垫层厚度。回顾性分析治疗结果和组织学诊断。结果:无EUS组共切除病变210例,仅meus组23例,SSI-mEUS组125例。SSI-mEUS组的平均SEL大小大于非SSI-mEUS组(6.8±2.6 mm vs. 4.9±2.6 mm, p < 0.001)。SSI-mEUS组110个肿瘤病灶中有107个(97.3%)实现R0切除术,而非SSI-mEUS组176个肿瘤病灶中有159个(90.3%)实现R0切除术(p = 0.046)。未使用si - meus是导致深切边缘不确定或阳性的唯一因素(优势比3.45,95%可信区间1.19-13.40,p = 0.021)。结论:对于结直肠SELs,包括那些在常规内镜检查中出现升高不足的SELs, SSI-mEUS能够客观评估内镜切除的可行性,并可以预测实现安全和完全切除的高可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Internal Medicine
Korean Journal of Internal Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
129
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine is an international medical journal published in English by the Korean Association of Internal Medicine. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, reviews, and editorials on all aspects of medicine, including clinical investigations and basic research. Both human and experimental animal studies are welcome, as are new findings on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases. Case reports will be published only in exceptional circumstances, when they illustrate a rare occurrence of clinical importance. Letters to the editor are encouraged for specific comments on published articles and general viewpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信