Analysis of the current status of difficult crossmatching and the causes of blood mismatch from 2017-2021.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Li Xiong, Yu Sun
{"title":"Analysis of the current status of difficult crossmatching and the causes of blood mismatch from 2017-2021.","authors":"Li Xiong, Yu Sun","doi":"10.1177/09287329251352992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood transfusion is a critical medical intervention, and accurate cross-matching is essential to prevent adverse reactions. However, difficult cross-matching (DCM), often caused by irregular antibodies, poses significant challenges, particularly in patients with prior transfusions, pregnancies, or certain medical conditions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the incidence and causes of DCM from 2017 to 2021 and propose strategies to improve transfusion safety and compatibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 363 patients who underwent difficult cross-matching due to incompatible blood matching between January 2017 and December 2021 were selected as the study population. Pre-transfusion testing was conducted for all patients to observe patterns in difficult cross-matching, assess the causes of blood mismatch, and analyze irregular antibody detection results. Based on these findings, specific treatment measures were proposed to address the causes of incompatibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most DCM cases occurred in females (81.27%), especially under 45 years of age, with obstetrics and gynecology being the most affected departments. Positive irregular antibodies were identified in 86.50% of cases, mainly from the Rh blood group system (42.99%), followed by autoantibodies (19.43%) and other blood group antibodies. Effective strategies included selecting antigen-negative blood, warming transfusions for cold autoantibodies, and using saline for pseudoagglutination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Irregular antibodies are the main cause of DCM. Accurate identification and tailored transfusion strategies are essential to ensure safety. Greater awareness and improved screening can reduce risks and enhance clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"9287329251352992"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329251352992","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Blood transfusion is a critical medical intervention, and accurate cross-matching is essential to prevent adverse reactions. However, difficult cross-matching (DCM), often caused by irregular antibodies, poses significant challenges, particularly in patients with prior transfusions, pregnancies, or certain medical conditions.

Objective: To analyze the incidence and causes of DCM from 2017 to 2021 and propose strategies to improve transfusion safety and compatibility.

Methods: A total of 363 patients who underwent difficult cross-matching due to incompatible blood matching between January 2017 and December 2021 were selected as the study population. Pre-transfusion testing was conducted for all patients to observe patterns in difficult cross-matching, assess the causes of blood mismatch, and analyze irregular antibody detection results. Based on these findings, specific treatment measures were proposed to address the causes of incompatibility.

Results: Most DCM cases occurred in females (81.27%), especially under 45 years of age, with obstetrics and gynecology being the most affected departments. Positive irregular antibodies were identified in 86.50% of cases, mainly from the Rh blood group system (42.99%), followed by autoantibodies (19.43%) and other blood group antibodies. Effective strategies included selecting antigen-negative blood, warming transfusions for cold autoantibodies, and using saline for pseudoagglutination.

Conclusion: Irregular antibodies are the main cause of DCM. Accurate identification and tailored transfusion strategies are essential to ensure safety. Greater awareness and improved screening can reduce risks and enhance clinical outcomes.

2017-2021年血配困难现状及错配原因分析
背景:输血是一项重要的医疗干预措施,准确的交叉配型对预防不良反应至关重要。然而,通常由不规则抗体引起的困难交叉匹配(DCM)带来了重大挑战,特别是在先前输血,怀孕或某些医疗条件的患者中。目的:分析2017 - 2021年DCM的发生率及原因,提出提高输血安全与相容性的对策。方法:选取2017年1月至2021年12月间因配血不配型导致交叉配型困难的患者363例作为研究人群。对所有患者进行输血前检测,观察交叉配型困难的规律,评估错配原因,分析不规则抗体检测结果。根据这些发现,提出了具体的治疗措施,以解决不相容的原因。结果:DCM患者以女性居多(81.27%),以45岁以下人群居多,以妇产科为最常见的科室。阳性不规则抗体占86.50%,主要来自Rh血型系统(42.99%),其次为自身抗体(19.43%)和其他血型抗体。有效的策略包括选择抗原阴性的血液,加热输注冷自身抗体,使用生理盐水进行假凝集。结论:不规则抗体是导致DCM的主要原因。准确的识别和量身定制的输血策略对于确保安全至关重要。提高认识和改进筛查可以降低风险并提高临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Technology and Health Care
Technology and Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
282
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered: 1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables. 2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words. Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics. 4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors. 5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信